Zoe Scaman’s Post

Presidentsverkiezingen VS. TRUMP POTUS🏌🏻♂️🤡🇺🇸 -Democrats Need to Fundamentally Rethink Every-thing—Starting Now https://lnkd.in/eWBQZDcT The lesson from 2024 is clear: If voters don’t see you as an agent of transformational change, they will turn to someone like Trump. -It’s Happening Again https://lnkd.in/eGK_Rvr8 And until Democrats can find a way to win back some large chunk of working-class voters, Trump’s successors will be favored in the next presidential election too! -Democratic Party Elites Brought Us This Disaster https://lnkd.in/etGhfuGP The story that is about to be pushed hard is that Ka-mala Harris lost because she was too far left. It will be pushed because this is the Democratic establish-ment’s go-to explanation for all its failures. Kamala Harris faced a near-impossible task in 2024. Inflation and the cost of living were soaring, and the Biden-Harris administration had been struggling for years to show Americans how it had improved their lives. Working-class voters, in particular, wanted concrete changes they could see and feel not just promises and statistics. Trump, with his brash populism and conspiracy-laden rhetoric, was more than ready to fill that void. He framed economic hardships as proof of Democratic incompetence, tapping into the frustrations of working-class communities who increasingly felt alienated from a Democratic Party that seemed more concerned with elite agendas than their daily challenges. So yes, the hurdles for Harris were high. But this dynamic was not new. As far back as Oct. 2020, Representative Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez warned the leaders of her party that “if these people’s lives don’t actually feel different, we’re done. You know how many Trumps there are in waiting?” For many voters, the Democratic establishment’s cautious, incremental approach feels disconnected from the pressing economic and cultural pressures reshaping their lives. Ocasio-Cortez’s message was true then, and it is still true now: Without bold, transformative action, Democrats risk ceding these voters to populists who promise to dismantle a system that feels rigged and unresponsive—as they found out so calamitously on Tuesday. .

In a recent article titled "Black Vote, Black Power," Keith Boykin and Word In Black delve into the 2024 presidential election, examining the issues, the candidates, and what's at stake for Black America. The article raises several key questions about the election results, including how it happened, why it happened, and what it means for the future. The article highlights the stark contrast between the voting patterns of different demographics, with Trump's base- white men, white women, and Hispanic men- making up 77% of the electorate, while Harris's base- Black women, Black men, and Latino men- representing only 18% of the electorate. It also explores the role of cultural resentment against a changing America in Trump's success. The article also discusses the potential impact of Trump's victory on the Supreme Court, the Department of Education, and the economy. It emphasizes the importance of self-care and community support in these challenging times. What are your thoughts on the election results and their implications for the future? How do you think the political landscape will change in the coming years?

In a recent article, Keith Boykin and Word In Black delve into the 2024 presidential election, examining the issues, the candidates, and what's at stake for Black America. The results have left many questioning how it happened, why it happened, and what it means for the future. The article highlights the three strongest groups that supported Donald Trump: white men, Hispanic men, and white women. On the other hand, Kamala Harris's strongest groups were Black women, Black men, and Latino women. The exit polls show that Trump's base made up 77% of the electorate, while Harris's base was only 18%. The article argues that this isn't about policy, but rather about cultural resentment against a changing America. It also raises questions about what Harris could have done differently and how Trump's base was willing to excuse or embrace his racism, sexism, and xenophobia. The article also highlights the potential consequences of Trump's victory, including the appointment of a new attorney general who could potentially fire Special Counsel Jack Smith and dismiss the criminal charges against Trump. It also discusses the potential for Trump to appoint vaccine denier RFK Jr. to head up women's health and vaccines and the possibility of mass deportation of immigrants through executive authority. What are your thoughts on the 2024 presidential election and its implications for the future? How do you think the results will impact the political landscape in the United States? https://lnkd.in/gzQWEiEr #2024election #presidentialelection #blackamerica #trumpbase #harrisbase

Gen Z x the 2024 US Presidential election: let’s talk about it. ⏩ Here’s what to know: -With more than 41M Gen Z voters, both Trump’s and Harris’s campaigns invested heavily in reaching Gen Z -Despite many newlines claiming Gen Z overwhelmingly backed Harris (e.g., “Harris maintains double-digit Gen Z lead over Trump in Harvard survey”) Trump actually GAINED ground with young voters this election. -Trump won the youth vote in 17 states, compared to just 7 states in 2020. -46% of young people voted for Trump, mainly young men, up from 36% in 2020. (CIRCLE) ⏩ How did he grow so much favor in youth culture? Trump focused on reaching younger MALE voters in conversational settings, visiting football games and participating in events with the NELK Boys, Theo Von and Joe Rogan. Just one example — Samir Chaudry broke down how "Conversational availability" on YouTube became a critical factor for Gen Z voters. Stats specific to podcast views on YouTube, not across RSS feeds: 🔴 Donald Trump 13 Videos, 124 million views 🔵 Kamala Harris 4 Videos, 2.4 million views ⏩ What else should we keep in mind: Overall youth voter turnout was actually down compared with 2020. Anything else? **Note: exit poll data is incomplete and may not be representative. It is important to follow updates in the coming weeks as we continue to unpack this. 📕 Read more:

First-time young voters could play a key roll in the outcome of the United States election and its been interesting to see how both parties are trying to get their support. Spent some time talking to the youths -- suddenly I'm not one of them -- to figure out what they are thinking about before casting a ballot. -- It felt like his future was at stake when 18-year-old Carter Fay cast an early ballot in the United States election. “The reality is that our democracy, I truly think, is on the line. And so do people in my generation,” said Fay, who’s from the battleground state of Georgia. “To put it straight, we are scared.” Fay is among an estimated eight million generation-Z voters who can take part in a presidential election for the very first time. There’s power behind this generation, which is angry at the current political system and worried about its future. And the race to the White House still looks to be a dead heat. Many young people were dismayed when it appeared the election would be a repeat of the 2020 matchup between President Joe Biden and former president Donald Trump. Trump had been chipping away at the Democrats’ hold on the youth vote, making inroads among young white men without college educations. He was also seeing some increasing support among young Black and Latino men. Democrats were concerned younger voters who felt apathetic about two older candidates might not even show up to the polls. There was a tumultuous turnaround after a disastrous presidential debate, and Biden removed his name from the Democrat ticket. Vice-President Kamala Harris catapulted into the candidacy boosted by a swell of memes, viral moments and the excitement of younger Americans. Polls suggest young people are overwhelmingly supportive of Harris, with a ratio of around 60-40, said the University of Pennsylvania’s Marc Trussler. But there is a significant gender divide. “Young men are much more pro-Trump,” said Trussler, director of data science for the university’s program on opinion research and election studies. “But even amongst young men, it’s probably tied between Harris and Trump, maybe a little bit pro-Harris.” Evan, who attended a recent Trump rally in Pennsylvania, said it was his first time voting for president. The 20-year-old, who didn’t give a last name, said he has been running a business since he was 12, and it’s difficult under the current administration. “Seeing the prices of stuff, inflation up-down, up-down,” Evan said. “Now, it’s like it’s finally our turn to have money in this world, do the things we want, and … (we) can’t afford nothing.” https://lnkd.in/g2qwfjXy

The latest Bloomberg News/Morning Consult poll shows an exceptionally tight race in the seven key swing states that will define this election. Here's what the map looks like according to that survey, with everything under a 1% margin listed as a toss-up. If that poll were to come to pass exactly we'd be talking about an election that wouldn't be called on election night. In several states, if it's tight enough, recount margins could even be in play. In several of these states, we're seeing early votes come in. There are a lot of tea leaves to read. Republicans are practically giddy about early vote numbers in Nevada, which as the Nevada Independent's Jon Ralston writes are outperforming in the heavily-Republican rural areas while Democrats are lagging in their traditional Las Vegas/Clark County firewall. The GOP is also happy about North Carolina's early vote, with home-state GOP Senator Thom Tillis on Bloomberg Television overnight predicting a Trump win by a similar margin as his 1 percentage point win in 2020. Republicans also put a lot of stock into predictive markets, which keep surging for Trump. In more liquid markets around the world, the so-called "Trump trade" is flowing accordingly. But as the great Lee Corso likes to say... not so fast my friend. Because there are signs of strength for Kamala Harris too. If you're the Harris campaign, what you're looking at is a pronounced gender gap among some of those early voters. Polls show a stark gap where men are backing Trump more and women going more for Harris. That would generally be the expectation, but it looks even more stark this year. There are a number of reasons for this, not least of which the Supreme Court's Dobbs decision on abortion and subsequent restrictive actions in conservative-controlled states. At the same time, there are signs that men (particularly younger men) have drifted rightward in recent years. Yet all things being equal, it's not equal. That's because men and women don't vote in equal numbers. Women vote more. Do some math with me: if you have a state where women are voting for Harris by a 10-point margin and men are voting for Trump also by 10, Harris will almost certainly win, as women traditionally out vote men 52-48 or somewhere thereabouts. If that has exacerbated to Harris winning women by 15 and Trump winning men by 15... Harris's win margin increases a little. Yet in many states in the early vote, women are voting more. For example, in Michigan, women account for a full 57% of early/absentee ballot requests. Atop all that, a giant caveat: Early votes may be momentum, but it may just be cannibalizing your election day vote. And thus, mean little in the grand scheme of things. All that is to say: there's an intense uncertainty less than two weeks from election day. You can read into the early vote any number of indicators and dream or panic accordingly. What we do know: It's very very close. And it may take days to know for sure.

Dear White Women: Please resist the urge. Resist the urge to deflect responsibility on white men, who “also voted for Trump.” Resist the urge to argue facts with feelings, insisting that the results are about present-day inflation rather than historical precedent. Resist the urge to consider that this result is about low Democratic voter turnout. I want you to ESPECIALLY resist to urge to analyze campaign strategy and marketing failures. Relevant overall, not relevant right now. We are talking to YOU. And this is going to hurt some feelings, but blaming white men to deflect from your own personal responsibility, as if we don’t already know what most of them are made of, is PRECISELY the example of how even the most well-meaning of you continue to outsource your internal power to white men. To be clear, none of this means that the behavior of white men and other groups vying for safety-by-proximity to whiteness isn’t relevant. The point is that white women have the closest proximity, the most access and the most renewable source of influence on white men. In many cases, even more than other white men. 💡 White men are raised by white women. 💡 White men need white women in order to have families, build legacies, and preserve whiteness. 💡 White men are incentivized and empowered, by and large, by white women. …I could go on. I would be much more interested in seeing the percentage of white women voting for Harris whose husbands—HUSBANDS—voted for Trump stacked against the percentage of white men voting for Harris whose wives voted for Trump. Until then, the valid criticism (and responsibility) of white women to stand on business EVERY day, not just when their lives are at stake, stands. This is not a moment to deflect. This is a moment to pick yourself up, retire your useless p**** hat, gather what’s left of your $#!%, and start working NOW for a better result in 2028. Respectfully (for now).

**The Harris-Walz Choice: Strategic and Progressive Partnership** Kamala Harris’s selection of Tim Walz as her vice-presidential candidate provides a stark contrast to J.D. Vance’s campaign approach. Harris's decision reflects a commitment to progressive values and a strategic electoral strategy. Here’s why this choice matters for business owners and professionals: 1. **Policy Alignment**: Tim Walz’s focus on healthcare reforms and climate change initiatives aligns perfectly with Harris’s progressive values. 2. **Experience in Governance**: Walz’s extensive governance experience complements Harris’s background, offering a solid base for effective leadership. 3. **Electoral Strategy**: Walz's popularity in Minnesota, a critical battleground state, can be pivotal in swinging the election in Harris’s favor. 4. **Inclusive Leadership**: Both Harris and Walz advocate for inclusive policies, promoting equity and justice, critical for galvanizing progressive support. 5. **Public Service Commitment**: Their combined years of public service emphasize a dedication to governance and community engagement. **Contrasting Vance’s Strategy** Understanding Vance’s differing strategy offers insight into the 2024 political landscape: 1. **Populist Appeal**: Vance leans into populist rhetoric, aiming to attract voters discontent with the establishment. 2. **Running Mate Selection**: Unlike Harris, Vance’s choice focuses on consolidating a specific voter base. 3. **Economic Positioning**: Vance promotes economic nationalism and industrial revitalization, diverging from Harris’s broader progressive agenda. 4. **Electoral Dynamics**: Vance targets states with strong populist sentiments, contrasting with Harris’s focus on progressive turnout. 5. **Contrast in Vision**: This highlights the starkly different futures the electorate might choose between progressive and populist pathways. **Implications for Business Owners** 1. **Uniting the Democratic Base**: Harris’s choice aims to unify the Democratic Party, which could impact regulatory and economic environments. 2. **Appealing to Swing Voters**: Walz’s moderate appeal might attract undecided voters, potentially stabilizing policy changes. 3. **Policy Synergy**: Their combined expertise offers a robust agenda, likely influencing sectors like healthcare, climate change, and economic reform. 4. **Strategic Geographic Focus**: Their strategy focuses on pivotal states, which could shift electoral results and subsequent business climates. 5. **Differing Visions**: The election’s outcome could substantially impact business strategies and economic policies in the years to come. **Next steps**: Maximize your financial health by understanding tax-saving strategies. Reach out to Together CFO for expert advice. Set up a call using this **[link](https://lnkd.in/gAa4dwUG.

J.D. Vance’s Impacts on Trump’s 2024 Campaign: Advantages and Considerations The selection of J.D. Vance as Donald Trump’s running mate for the 2024 presidential election will bring both strategic benefits and challenges. Here’s a detailed examination: Advantages: Sophisticated Communication: Vance’s academic background and experience in media offer a unique ability to articulate complex policy positions. His nuanced approach could help clarify Trump’s platform to a broader electorate, enhancing the campaign’s communication strategy. Resonance with Working-Class Voters: Vance’s focus on economic revitalization and his alignment with Trump’s populist themes could bolster support in key battleground regions. His insight into socio-economic issues can reinforce the campaign’s appeal to working-class voters who feel left behind by traditional politics. Balanced Rhetoric: While Trump’s style is often direct and confrontational, Vance’s more measured tone could temper divisive rhetoric. This can potentially attract undecided and moderate voters seeking a more balanced ticket. Policy Expertise: Vance’s experience with economic and social policy issues could complement Trump’s platform, adding depth to discussions on key issues like job creation and economic reform. This alignment can enhance the campaign’s credibility on substantive policy matters. Challenges and Remedies: Limited High-Level Political Experience: Vance’s relative inexperience in high-stakes political roles might raise concerns about his readiness for the vice presidency. To address this, the campaign could emphasize Vance’s policy acumen and successful collaborations with key stakeholders, showcasing his readiness to contribute effectively. Past Controversies: Vance’s memoir, “Hillbilly Elegy,” and some previous statements might alienate certain voter segments. Mitigation strategies could include focusing on Vance’s current positions and accomplishments, while addressing past controversies transparently to highlight his evolution and commitment to current campaign values. Potential Partisan Reinforcement: Vance’s alignment with Trump could reinforce partisan divisions. The campaign should emphasize Vance’s commitment to bridging partisan gaps and promoting unity, showcasing his efforts to engage with a diverse range of voters. By leveraging Vance’s strengths and addressing these potential challenges thoughtfully, the Trump-Vance ticket could enhance its strategic positioning and appeal to a wider voter base. #JDVance #DonaldTrump #2024Election #CampaignStrategy #Populism #PoliticalCommunication #EconomicPolicy #ModerateTone #Election2024 #RunningMate #PoliticalLeadership #PolicyExpertise #CampaignStrength #VoterAppeal #PoliticalStrategy #PublicPolicy #ElectionCampaign #ModerateVoice #PopulistAgenda #TrumpVance #CampaignAdvantages #Leadership #VoterEngagement #CampaignEffectiveness #PoliticalChallenges

Kamala Harris has several strengths that could position her favorably in the next U.S. election against Donald Trump. Firstly, she brings a diverse background and experience as both a senator and the current vice president. This experience not only adds credibility but also allows her to connect with a wide range of voters, especially those who value representation and inclusivity in government. Her unique perspective as a woman of color can resonate with many Americans seeking change and progress. Secondly, Harris has a strong focus on key issues that matter to voters. Her commitment to social justice, healthcare reform, and climate change aligns with the growing concerns of the electorate. By addressing these critical topics with clear policies, she can appeal to a broad spectrum of voters who prioritize these issues. In contrast, Trump's previous administration faced criticism over its handling of various social and environmental challenges, which may sway voters toward Harris's vision for the future. Moreover, Harris has demonstrated an ability to build coalitions and foster unity within the Democratic Party. Her efforts to engage with different groups, including progressives and moderates, can enhance her campaign's reach. By promoting a message of collaboration and inclusivity, she may attract independent voters who are looking for a candidate capable of bringing people together. Additionally, public sentiment can play a significant role in elections. If economic recovery, equality, and public health remain central concerns, voters may gravitate toward a candidate who emphasizes comprehensive solutions to these challenges. Harris's policies on job creation and economic equity can resonate with those who feel left behind, offering a compelling alternative to Trump's approach. In conclusion, Kamala Harris's diverse background, focus on pressing issues, coalition-building efforts, and responsiveness to public sentiment offer her a strong chance of winning the next U.S. election against Donald Trump. By effectively communicating her vision and connecting with voters, she can create a momentum that propels her campaign forward, making her a formidable candidate in the race.