מחלקת הבקרה: The IDF's Devil's Advocate Unit and Law Firm Risk Management

מחלקת הבקרה: The IDF's Devil's Advocate Unit and Law Firm Risk Management

The practice of law, inherently fraught with complexity and uncertainties, presents an array of risks that law firms must navigate. Risk management is essential in legal practice, but conventional approaches often fall short. This is where a lesson from the Israeli Defense Force's (IDF) מחלקת הבקרה (Makhleket HaBakara) or the 'Devil's Advocate Unit' provides valuable perspective.

What is Makhleket HaBakara?

Created in 1974 in response to intelligence failures of the Yom Kippur War, the Makhleket HaBakara is an IDF unit tasked with challenging prevailing groupthink assumptions and strategies. It examines tactical and strategic plans, not just to find weaknesses but to proactively suggest alternative strategies - looking left when everyone else is looking right.

In the military context, this rigorous approach can mean the difference between victory and defeat, life and death.

Adopting the Devil's Advocate Approach in Law Firms

Law firms are confronted with a myriad of risks: business challenges, malpractice and other lawsuits, cyber breaches, ethical dilemmas, and client dissatisfaction, to name a few. Conventional risk management often involves compliance checks and standard operating procedures but lacks the probing rigor that can uncover hidden pitfalls.

1. Institutionalizing Contrarian Views

Just as the Devil's Advocate Unit is an institution, so should the contrarian viewpoint be established within your law firm. While this could take many forms, an Office of the General Counsel consisting of a dedicated and experienced risk management team responsible for analyzing the robustness of the firm's legal strategies, internal policies, and client management techniques is invaluable.

2. Embracing Cognitive Diversity

Law firms must actively seek cognitive diversity when forming their devil's advocate GC teams. Such teams should consist of legal experts with different specializations and incorporating non-legal professionals to provide unique perspectives. Vendors can be especially effective team members.

3. Challenging the Status Quo

By design, a devil's advocate unit should have the autonomy to question high-stakes decisions or deeply rooted practices without the fear of reprisal. This function isn't merely a formality but a necessary mechanism to foster a culture of continuous improvement and risk mitigation.

4. Expanding the Scope

While the immediate application of this approach may seem most relevant to case strategies, its potential extends further. It can be applied to business development, ethical considerations, and even in determining the firm's overall direction and mission.

Practical Steps for Implementation

1. Setting Up the Unit

Create a team and empower them with the resources they need to critically evaluate strategies and decisions. This should not be a side job; it demands dedicated time and effort. Compensate the work.

2. Define the Mandate Clearly

The unit's role must be clearly defined. Is it limited to examining ongoing cases or does their purview include internal policies, business strategies, and ethical considerations? Create checks and balances to prevent mission creep.

3. Ongoing Training

This team should be provided with training not just in legal aspects but also in critical thinking, emotional intelligence, and even war-gaming techniques to model different scenarios.

4. Formalized Feedback Loop

There should be a structured mechanism for the devil's advocate unit to present their findings, and equally importantly, a requirement for the decision-makers to respond substantively to the critique.

5. Periodic Review

A system for periodic review of the unit's efficacy should be in place, making adjustments as needed to the scope, process, or personnel involved.

Conclusion

Law firms can learn a lot from the IDF’s Makhleket HaBakara in approaching risk management.

This model brings rigor, diversifies viewpoints, and offers a formalized approach to identifying and mitigating risks. It moves beyond mere compliance to a proactive strategy for anticipating issues and challenges.

By integrating a devil’s advocate approach into your risk management protocols, you can protect their interests more robustly. This not only safeguards your firm but also enhances client trust and lays the groundwork for ethical, well-considered legal practice.

In our ever-complex world, this might just be the strategy law firms never knew you needed, but should not go without.

Let's chat about better practice, less stress.

Eric Smith

J.D., Chairman & CEO at Decision Technologies Corporation

1y

This is a truly great idea and may likely the one of the best ways to find and eliminate "blind spots" dangerous to both clients and the firm. If a firm is large enough to have a dedicated "Chief Risk Officer" or "GC," they should definitely set this up and likely Chair it. For smaller firms, mitigating risk is (or should be) an inherent part of the Managing Partner's or sole proprietor's role . . . a part too often overlooked in the day-to-day challenges of running the firm's business. It would be wise to be cognizant of this and dedicate at least some time to it. Thanks, Jeff, for highlighting this . . . Eric

To view or add a comment, sign in

Insights from the community

Others also viewed

Explore topics