280 McNuggets, please
Why you need to know the difference between generative AI and analytical AI
Imagine pulling up to McDonald’s drive-thru, hungry for a quick meal, only to find yourself pleading, “Stop! Stop! Stop!” as the AI ordering system keeps adding Chicken McNuggets to your order - eventually reaching 280 pieces. This isn’t science fiction; it happened at one of McDonald’s drive-thrus in 2024, leading the company to end its three-year AI experiment.
This high-profile failure wasn’t just about a malfunctioning system - it was a result of a fundamental misunderstanding of which type of AI to use for which task. While McDonald’s competitors like White Castle and Wendy’s succeeded with their AI ordering systems, McDonald’s approach failed because it relied on the wrong kind of artificial intelligence.
What went wrong? The solution was surprisingly simple: McDonald’s competitors got it right by using the right tool for the job. While McDonald’s AI system tried to engage in open-ended conversations with customers (leading to those endless McNugget orders), successful implementations at White Castle and Wendy’s used specialised AI systems designed to do one thing well: recognise specific menu items and process orders accurately.
This is where most businesses today stumble. Caught up in the ChatGPT hype, they reach for generative AI when traditional analytical AI would do the job better. It’s like using a Swiss Army knife to hammer a nail when you have a perfectly good hammer in your toolbox.
In McDonald’s case, the ideal solution was staring them in the face. Speech recognition and order processing isn’t a creative task - it’s a pattern recognition problem. Traditional analytical AI excels at exactly this: taking specific inputs (customer voice orders), matching them against known patterns (menu items), and producing consistent, accurate outputs (order details).
Know Your AIs
Understanding the differences between AI types isn’t just academic - it’s crucial for practical business success. Let’s look at what each type of AI does best, and you’ll see why using the right tool for the right job makes all the difference:
Analytical AI excels at:
Generative AI is perfect for:
Recommended by LinkedIn
Choose Your AI Wisely
Think of analytical AI as that methodical friend who always shows up on time, follows the rules to the letter, and would never dream of improvising your tax return. They’re fantastic with numbers and patterns but completely lost when reading between the lines of a complex document.
Generative AI, on the other hand, is like that friend who has read many books and is generally very smart but also experiments with illicit drugs, and you never know when. They can digest and understand thousands of documents with remarkable insight - just make sure to fact-check their conclusions.
So, how can your business avoid a McNuggets-scale mishap? Here’s a simple rule of thumb: use analytical AI if the task requires consistent, accurate decisions based on structured data. If it involves understanding context, creativity, or processing human language - consider generative AI, but with appropriate oversight.
Oh, and the most important thing to remember is that only some problems might benefit from AI-based solutions (generative or analytical). In many cases, more traditional IT solutions might be so much better. Ultimately, you wouldn’t use ChatGPT to calculate your tax return. Right? Right???
Prof. Marek Kowalkiewicz is a Professor and Chair in Digital Economy at QUT Business School. Listed among the Top 100 Global Thought Leaders in Artificial Intelligence by Thinkers360, Marek has led global innovation teams in Silicon Valley, was a Research Manager of SAP's Machine Learning lab in Singapore, a Global Research Program Lead at SAP Research, as well as a Research Fellow at Microsoft Research Asia. His newest book is called "The Economy of Algorithms: AI and the Rise of the Digital Minions".
If you liked this post from The Economy of Algorithms, please share it!
See me live:
Artist (Fine Art), Keynote Speaker, Panelist, Writer
1dWell said. I might quote this for friends who believe everything AI tells them
Digital Guide & Consultant, facilitating Digital Business Innovation & Transformation
1d"Generative AI, on the other hand, is like that friend who has read many books and is generally very smart but also experiments with illicit drugs, and you never know when." 😂 Wonderful, love that picture and agree 100%. It's precisely these (artificial) weird birds - some call them parrots 😉 - that expand the scope of what's conceivable and encourage us to push boundaries when it comes to the unknown, real visions of the future or new possibilities.
Professor of Chemistry; Information Society, Internet Governance, e-learning, e-government. Internet Hall of Fame class of 2021.
3dWhat an excellent, valuable and useful piece. Thanks for the effort of putting it together. No surprise that your book is so solid!
Teaching Faculty at UW-Madison iSchool, Co-Chair of GEE! Learning Game Awards
3dGreat write-up! I expect we'll see a lot more Nugget Situations because of the low cost (time & $) of setup for gen AI as opposed to targeted tools.
Guess there’s a balance between being an informative AI educator, commentator and wise forecaster vs a PR sensationalist there Marek. Been following your writing and read your book but I find it hard to see where your position is firmly grounded….maybe we’re all carried by the ebbs and flows of these current currents and positions remain fluid….for me the tech is changing so quickly that many anecdotes age very quickly indeed.