3 Components of Transformational Change
In my experience, major change requires strong, top-down guidance supported and driven by bottom-up pressure for change. It’s easy to point to the need for transformational change while picking the low-hanging fruit of incremental change. Although change initiatives abound in healthcare, most are piecemeal efforts that marginally improve existing systems. Major, transformative changes such as shifting from fee-for-service to value-based medicine require more than gradational improvements from current operations.
Drawing from my experience as a consultant and educator, I believe transformational change requires the following three commitments.
Build a Portfolio of Initiatives
First, building a portfolio of initiatives that meet short-term requirements while investing in longer-term, more transformative initiatives ensures that there is no trade-off in pursuing either incremental or transformative change. Rather, improving operations by freeing up resources supports investments in more transformative initiatives. The reason is simple: Transformative changes are rarely accretive in the short term. Thus, while incremental changes—typically aimed at improving efficiency or developing related businesses—may not in themselves drive systemic transformation, they are necessary to support longer-term transformational initiatives.
So how should organizations develop a portfolio of strategic initiatives that are both incremental and revolutionary? They need to create a portfolio of critical priorities built upon what I call “core,” “new” and “wow” tactics.
Embrace Failure
Second, be willing to experiment and thus embrace failure as a learning prerequisite to create new, transformative healthcare delivery models. The problem then becomes how much risk the organization is willing to take on.
Objectivity is too often lacking when assessing progress toward goals, and then deciding what needs to be done to make amends going forward. Typically, when an individual or team is successful, personal efforts are lauded; when things do not go so well, pressures that “no one could control” are blamed. Worse, the organizational culture unique to healthcare settings can impede change.
The lack of organizational learning from failures can be explained instead by three less obvious, even counterintuitive, reasons: an emphasis on individual vigilance in healthcare, unit efficiency concerns and empowerment. These three factors, while seemingly beneficial for nurses and patients alike, may leave nurses overwhelmed in a system bound to have breakdowns because of the need to provide individualized treatments for patients.
The key is to shift one’s culture from an accountability lens—assessing fault—to one embracing failure as the way to learn and change. After all, most transformative initiatives will not be successful. Still, without such experiments, how will the U.S. healthcare system evolve and survive?
Monitor Signals
Finally, monitor key signals for disruptive change. This means shifting from a primary concern with internal operations (e.g., improving quality) to an external focus (e.g., identifying future needs of patients and payers). While no one can predict the future, it is important for organizations to periodically engage in “what if” exercises on the implications of alternative future scenarios.
As part of your transformational change process, ask the following questions:
Recommended by LinkedIn
Transformative change is emotionally challenging, time-consuming (as it frequently requires changing cultures) and inherently risky. The movement requires strategic change that builds upon a portfolio of initiatives to improve current operations while investing in transformative future initiatives, embraces failure as a necessary part of learning and monitors the external environment to prepare for an uncertain future—no matter what that future may bring.
Jim Austin is adjunct senior professor, Executive Master of Healthcare Leadership, Brown University.
Editor’s Note: This content has been excerpted from “Strategic Healthcare Change: Balancing Change and Stability,” Journal of Healthcare Management, vol. 68, no. 1, by Jim Austin. It has been edited down for length.
The American College of Healthcare Executives (ACHE) is a network of leaders committed to excellence in healthcare and achieving their personal best.
Be sure to SUBSCRIBE to this newsletter for more relevant insights in healthcare leadership.
➡️ REGISTER TODAY for ⭐ ACHE 2025 Congress for Healthcare Leadership HERE
➡️ Discover more healthcare thought leadership on the ACHE Blog HERE
➡️ Listen to the latest Healthcare Executive Podcast HERE
➡️ Learn more about ACHE and consider joining the mission HERE
Healthcare Professional/Educator
2moGreat advice! Thank you for sharing 👍
Principal and Cofounder | Strategy Design, Systems Improvement, Leadership Growth
2moEnjoyed reading this, thank you. I'm struck by how many organizations that support continuous learning and improvement still struggle to embrace and learn from failure. As healthcare leaders, teams and organizations, it's our job to foster a culture of experimentation and improvement, including the measurement of impact over time and celebration of successes and failures along the way.
President & CEO at Hearthside Home Care Inc. dba FirstLight Home Care Guilford & FirstLight Home Care Jacksonville and Crystal Coast NC
2moVery Good. (Be Present)
Data-Driven Leader and Transformational Educator with a Passion for Positive Outcomes | KMGM
2moLove this. This is so true. I am in favor of shared governance to move transformation in a timely manner. Allowing failed attempts to drive perfection. Quality outcomes require leaders to position their teams with measureable goals and the flexibility to be innovative in their efforts to achieve.