Agile Leadership And Mission Command

As I met with John, a new Agile leader, it was evident that he felt frustrated and overwhelmed. "I'm not sure if I'm cut out for this," he confessed, running a hand through his hair. "Leading an Agile team is harder than I expected."

Curious to understand his situation better, I encouraged John to share more. He explained that his previous leadership style was more traditional, involving clear instructions and unquestioning adherence from his team. However, as an Agile leader, he struggled to let go of control and empower his team to make their own decisions. Effective communication and keeping track of tasks also posed challenges for him.

John's struggles echoed common mistakes made by new Agile leaders. He treated his team as if they were still part of a traditional, hierarchical structure instead of empowering them to take ownership of their work. Additionally, he faced communication obstacles, which are crucial in an Agile environment.

To help John overcome these challenges, I suggested solutions based on the principles of good Agile leadership and mission command.

First, building trust with his team would be essential. Trust forms the foundation of an Agile team, enabling open sharing of ideas and concerns. John could foster trust by being transparent, sharing information, actively listening to feedback, and collaborating with his team to solve problems.

Second, implementing Agile practices could improve communication and task management. Participating in daily Scrums or stand-up meetings would facilitate updates and discussions on obstacles. Visual management tools like Kanban boards or burndown charts would help monitor progress and ensure alignment towards shared goals. Utilising OKRs (Objectives and Key Results) could provide a framework for sharing purposes, outcomes, and the team's role in achieving them.

Lastly, I reminded John that as an Agile leader, his role is to provide a clear intent rather than micromanaging the team's work. Communicating the purpose and desired outcome of projects or missions is vital, trusting the team to utilise their expertise and judgment in achieving those goals.

By the end of our conversation, I noticed John's increased confidence and enthusiasm to implement these strategies. "Thank you," he said. "I now have a better understanding of what I need to do. It won't be easy, but I'm excited to give it my best."

The Pitfalls of Command and Control

Many leaders are taught to direct their teams using a Command and Control approach. However, this style hinders quick decision-making and often results in micro-management to ensure compliance. Ideally, leaders desire self-organising teams that can navigate their own path to success, stepping in only when challenges arise. Command and Control Management can prevent teams from becoming self-organising in several ways:

1. Lack of autonomy: Team members are expected to follow strict orders and adhere to predefined procedures. This leaves little room for them to exercise judgment or creativity, hindering their development of essential skills for self-organization.
2. Limited communication: Typically there is one-way communication, with leaders giving orders and team members following them. This culture discourages team members from sharing their ideas or feedback, hampering effective collaboration and the development of trust and shared understanding required for autonomous teams.
3. Slow decision-making: Decision-making is often centralised, with leaders making all important decisions. This can result in slow decision-making and an inability to respond promptly to changing circumstances, inhibiting effective team adaptation and independence.

Command and Control Management features a hierarchical organisational structure where decision-making power is centralised at the top, with leaders giving specific instructions and closely monitoring individuals' performance.

This management style also significantly impacts the leaders using it. Potential impacts of a command and control management style on the leader include:

1. Increased stress: Leaders may feel responsible for making all decisions and ensuring teams follow instructions, leading to high-stress levels and pressure.
2. Limited creativity: A command and control management style stifles creativity and innovation among teams or individuals, as they may not feel empowered to suggest new ideas or take risks.
3. Limited development of individuals: This management style restricts team members' development opportunities as they may not be given chances to enhance their skills or take on new challenges.
4. Limited collaboration: Command and control management discourages collaboration among team members, as they may be discouraged from working together or sharing ideas.
5. Reduced trust and respect: The use of this management style can erode trust and respect between the leader and the team, as individuals may feel micromanaged or undervalued.

Agile Leadership and Mission Command

In contrast, Agile leadership, with its mission command principles, encourages individuals to become self-organising. It grants autonomy, establishes communication channels, and delegates decision-making power, enabling effective collaboration and adaptation. This approach empowers teams to be creative, responsive, and capable of driving success.

Mission Command is a leadership philosophy that emphasises empowering teams to make decisions and take initiative to achieve a shared goal. Although commonly associated with military operations, Mission Command has also been adopted in various other contexts, including business and government.

In the military, Mission Command is characterised by a commander's intent, providing guidance and a clear understanding of the desired outcome, while allowing teams to adapt to changing circumstances and exercise initiative. Empowering team members to make decisions enables agility and responsiveness in rapidly changing situations.

Agile leadership shares similarities with Mission Command. Both approaches emphasise empowerment in decision-making. However, agile leadership is typically associated with dynamic and fast-paced environments such as software development, where rapid iterations and responsiveness to customer feedback are critical.

Agile leadership focuses on collaboration, experimentation, and continuous improvement. Similar to Mission Command, agile leadership emphasises setting a clear vision and providing guidance, while enabling teams or individuals to exercise autonomy and adapt to changing circumstances. Both Mission Command and agile leadership prioritise flexibility and adaptability over rigid control and micromanagement.

Agile leadership revolves around empowering teams and individuals to work autonomously, providing the necessary resources and support to achieve their goals. Agile leaders cultivate an environment of trust, respect, and open communication, where everyone contributes ideas and works collaboratively towards a shared vision.

Key characteristics of Agile leadership include:

1. Flexibility and Adaptability: Agile leaders respond quickly to changes in the business environment, adjusting strategies and plans accordingly.
2. Empowerment: Agile leaders trust their team members to make decisions and take ownership of their work, providing autonomy and resources for success.
3. Continuous Improvement: Agile leaders focus on continuous learning and improvement, encouraging experimentation and feedback to drive innovation.
4. Collaboration: Agile leaders value collaboration and teamwork, recognising that diverse perspectives and ideas lead to better outcomes.
5. Customer-Centricity: Agile leaders prioritise customer needs, seeking to understand preferences and behaviours to deliver products and services that meet those needs.

Overall, Agile leadership is a management style that values adaptability, collaboration, and continuous improvement, empowering teams and individuals to reach their full potential while driving innovation and growth.

Mission Command Mistakes

Leaders new to Mission Command may make several mistakes as they strive to implement this leadership philosophy.

1. Unclear communication of intent: Failing to communicate the commander's intent clearly can result in confusion and misalignment among teams or individuals.
2. Micromanagement: Leaders new to Mission Command may struggle to let go of control, leading to micromanagement. This undermines autonomy and decision-making, which are central tenets of Mission Command.
3. Inadequate delegation: Failing to delegate responsibility effectively can lead to a lack of initiative and accountability among individuals.
4. Insufficient training and support: Providing inadequate training and support to teams can leave them feeling overwhelmed and unsure of how to proceed.
5. Resistance to change: Leaders new to Mission Command may struggle to adjust plans and decisions when unexpected situations arise, resulting in missed opportunities or costly mistakes.

Leaders new to Mission Command must be mindful of these potential mistakes and work to overcome them through effective communication, delegation, training, and adaptation.

Agile Leadership Mistakes

Agile leadership, despite its effectiveness, can still be prone to common mistakes. Here are some examples of mistakes that agile leaders may make:

1. Overemphasis on short-term goals: Agile leaders may prioritise immediate results at the expense of long-term objectives.
2. Lack of clear expectations: Agile leadership's flexibility can sometimes lead to a lack of clarity regarding expectations and accountability.
3. Ineffective communication: Agile leadership relies heavily on communication and collaboration. Leaders who struggle with effective communication may find it challenging to maintain alignment among team members.
4. Neglecting individual needs: Focusing solely on the team as a whole can lead to overlooking individual needs and development, resulting in burnout, turnover, and decreased motivation.
5. Resistance to change: Agile leaders must be open to change and continuously improve their approach. Leaders resistant to change may become stagnant and lose their competitive edge.
6. Taking on too much at once: Agile leaders' bias for action may lead them to tackle too many tasks simultaneously, resulting in burnout, missed deadlines, and a lack of focus on critical priorities.

To succeed as an agile leader, one must be aware of these potential mistakes and work to mitigate them through effective communication, clear expectations, prioritisation of individual needs, embracing change, and maintaining a focus on critical priorities.

Overcoming Nervousness in Agile Leadership

It is common for leaders to feel nervous when adopting a new leadership approach. Here are strategies agile leaders can employ to overcome nervousness related to agile leadership:

1. Educate yourself: Learn as much as possible about agile leadership and its principles. This will help you understand the benefits of the approach and give you the confidence to apply it effectively. Also, familiarise yourself with various Agile Frameworks to understand how teams operate in an Agile environment.
2. Build a support network: Seek out other agile leaders or mentors who can provide guidance and support. They can serve as a sounding board for ideas and help you navigate any challenges that arise.
3. Start small: Begin with a small team or pilot project to test the waters and build confidence in your skills before scaling up.
4. Communicate transparently: Effective communication is key in agile leadership. To build trust, be transparent with your team about goals, expectations, and progress.
5. Embrace failure: Agile leadership encourages experimentation and learning from failure. Understand that not everything will go as planned, and be ready to adjust your approach based on what you learn.
6. Stay flexible: Agility requires flexibility and adaptability. Be prepared to adjust plans as new information becomes available or circumstances change.

By adopting these strategies, agile leaders can build confidence and overcome nervousness related to agile leadership. Remember that successful leaders are often those willing to take risks and try new approaches. Be bold and embrace the benefits that agile leadership can bring to your organisation.

Looking to upskill and boost your career prospects in the world of agile methodology? Look no further than Fractal Systems’ Agile Training!

Looking for more valuable insights? Join our Fractal Systems mailing list and receive exclusive weekly content on all things Agile.