Agile: You get what you wish for!
With Agile adoption, organizations usually get what they wish for.
But, do they get something meaningful and useful?
Not always. Usually, only to an extent.
Adopting #Agile in a meaningful and useful manner is difficult but definitely achievable. And, it requires the organization to have the right #focus and the #commitment to put in decent amount of effort, over a long period of time.
The right Focus is the starting point!
For example, here is the success criteria many leaders focus on while adopting Agile at the team level:
It often feels like 'Checkbox' Agile - Agile is being adopted to fulfill a compliance requirement or to make some senior leader happy. Team members usually continue to work in silos and most of the decision making it driven by the Scrum Master (aka The Manager).
Some leaders learn to go a little further and focus on process maturity:
Recommended by LinkedIn
Defintely an improvement over the first case, but it is still a medium maturity behavour at best as the focus is more on the process than the outcomes.
High maturity leaders understand that #process and #practices must subordinate to #outcomes and focus on:
1. #Value driven development and delivery
2. #Visibility and #predictability of the flow of work
3. Collaborative and Self-Organizing Team Culture
With the right focus on Outcomes, choosing the right practices itself becomes an empirical process. It matters less if we use #Scrum, #Kanban, #SAFe, or a combination of practices from different frameworks.
As I mentioned before, it is difficult but definitely achievable.
And, once you stay on course long enough, it becomes a rewarding and enriching journey!
Strategic delivery | Agile practitioner-coach | Product engineering | High-performing teams
2yWell said! Reminded me of every time I've seen teams that score 100% on agile maturity checklists, yet struggle so much to release stuff. That's also been the bane here in Australia. People equate agile with Jira, PI planning, stand-ups, frameworks and coaches.
Scrum Master - NAB
2yWhilst their is truth and value in what you say, there is quite often value in the check box approach. Where a large organisation has a multitude of practices that are producing completely inconsistent results you need to start by introducing a consistency so you can measure the performance of the Organisation. This potentially provides transparency on the systemic issues in the Organisation. Sometimes working to become a cohesive and aligned Organisation is more important than being Agile. As the Organisation becomes consistent you start to see the Organisational bottlenecks. Fixing these then allows you to focus on agility. That consistency is especially important when you have 20+ years of technical debt to address.
Subscribe to weekly newsletter for articles ✦ Coddiwompler
2yYour message is spot on. I however have a slightly different take but same intent. In order to become agile you have to change direction and cannot stay on the same path.
"Driving Product Capability | Customer-First & business-aligned Approach | Transforming Product Strategies into Operational Excellence and Measurable Impact"
2yWow 🤩 after a very long time Sanjay Kumar sirji