Article 1: Demystifying ISO 26262 – A Journey Through Its Structured Process

ISO 26262 is more than just a standard—it’s a structured roadmap that guides the development of safety-critical systems in automotive engineering. By breaking down its process into well-defined phases, it ensures safety is not an afterthought but an integral part of the lifecycle. In this article, we’ll explore how ISO 26262 achieves this, detailing the safety management process, concept phase, system phase, hardware phase, software phase, and supporting processes.

The Core of ISO 26262: A Lifecycle Approach

ISO 26262 emphasizes safety throughout the entire product lifecycle, ensuring every phase contributes to a cohesive and reliable safety framework. Let’s walk through the key phases.

1. Safety Management Process

Purpose: The safety management process ensures functional safety is planned, monitored, and maintained across all development phases.

Key Activities:

• Establishing a safety culture to promote awareness and accountability among all stakeholders.
• Defining roles and responsibilities, such as appointing functional safety managers.
• Creating a safety plan that documents all safety activities, including milestones and deliverables.
• Managing changes systematically to ensure modifications align with the safety framework.

Deliverables:

• Safety Plan: Documents the planned safety activities and their timelines.
• Safety Case: Compiles evidence to demonstrate compliance with safety requirements.
• Confirmation Reviews: Verify that processes and activities follow the planned safety framework.

2. Concept Phase

Purpose: The concept phase identifies potential safety risks and establishes safety goals to mitigate them.

Key Activities:

• Item Definition: Clearly define the system or component under analysis.Describe its functionality, boundaries, and interfaces.Outline the operating environment and any assumptions made during the design.
• Hazard Analysis and Risk Assessment (HARA): Identify potential hazards in the system.Assess risks based on severity, exposure, and controllability.Assign an Automotive Safety Integrity Level (ASIL) to each identified hazard.
• Functional Safety Concept: Define high-level safety measures that will mitigate the identified hazards.

Deliverables:

• Detailed item definition, including boundaries and assumptions.
• HARA documentation with ASIL assignments.
• A functional safety concept outlining safety strategies.

3. System Phase

Purpose: The system phase translates high-level safety goals into technical requirements and designs the system architecture to support them.

Key Activities:

• Technical Safety Requirements: Derive specific safety requirements from the functional safety goals.Ensure requirements are traceable to hazards identified in the concept phase.
• System Design: Develop a high-level architecture that includes safety mechanisms such as redundancy and diagnostics.Incorporate fault-tolerant design principles.
• Interface Definition: Define clear communication and interactions between hardware and software components.

Deliverables:

• A list of technical safety requirements derived from safety goals.
• A high-level system architecture that integrates safety mechanisms.
• Interface specifications detailing hardware-software interactions.

4. Hardware Development Phase

Purpose: The hardware phase ensures that electronic and electrical components meet the defined safety requirements.

Key Activities:

• Hardware Design: Design hardware components like sensors, circuits, and controllers to implement safety measures.
• Failure Mode and Effect Analysis (FMEA): Identify potential failure modes for each hardware component.Assess the impact of these failures on system safety.Propose measures to mitigate or tolerate these failures.
• Fault Tolerance Verification: Test and validate the fault-detection and fault-handling mechanisms.

Deliverables:

• Hardware safety requirements tailored to the system architecture.
• FMEA results highlighting potential failure modes and mitigation strategies.
• Hardware test reports validating compliance with safety requirements.

5. Software Development Phase

Purpose: The software phase ensures the system’s codebase is designed, developed, and tested to meet safety requirements.

Key Activities:

• Software Architecture Design: Define the structure of the software, ensuring safety-critical components are isolated.
• Coding Standards: Adhere to strict coding guidelines, such as MISRA, to minimize errors.
• Software Testing: Perform unit testing to validate individual software modules.Conduct integration testing to ensure seamless interaction between components.Execute system-level testing to validate overall functionality and compliance.

Deliverables:

• Software safety requirements specifying safety needs at the code level.
• A detailed software architecture incorporating isolation and fault tolerance.
• Comprehensive test reports confirming software compliance.

6. Supporting Processes

Purpose: Supporting processes ensure consistency and quality across the development lifecycle.

Key Activities:

• Configuration Management: Track and manage changes to ensure consistency across all product versions.
• Verification and Validation (V&V): Conduct reviews and testing to confirm the system meets all safety requirements.
• Tool Qualification: Validate tools used in development, such as compilers and analyzers, to ensure they don’t introduce risks.

Deliverables:

• Configuration records documenting all changes.
• Validation plans and reports verifying system compliance.
• Tool qualification reports confirming the suitability of development tools.

Connecting the Phases

ISO 26262 isn’t just a collection of isolated activities. Each phase builds upon the previous:

• The concept phase identifies hazards, forming the foundation for technical safety requirements in the system phase.
• The hardware and software phases implement these requirements, ensuring the system is fault-tolerant.
• Supporting processes provide a consistent framework that ensures quality and safety throughout the lifecycle.

This interconnected approach ensures that safety is integrated into every step of development, from concept to decommissioning.

Key Takeaways

1. ISO 26262 emphasizes a lifecycle approach, embedding safety in every phase of development.
2. Each phase has well-defined activities and deliverables that ensure a systematic approach to safety.
3. Supporting processes ensure consistency, traceability, and compliance across all phases of the lifecycle.

In the next article, we’ll explore how this structured process applies to a real-world example: a Level 4 Autonomous Emergency Braking System (AEBS). Starting with the item definition, we’ll demonstrate how each phase contributes to a safe and reliable product.

Stay tuned as we take a step closer to unraveling the practical application of ISO 26262!

#FunctionalSafety #ISO26262 #AutomotiveSafety #LifecycleApproach