BANT is Popular for a Reason - it Works, but is BANT Enough?
In B2B Lead generation, choosing the right method of qualifying lead makes the difference between acquiring and losing a lead. BANT is typically associated with BOTF leads who are at the precipice of conversion and need that one final push to the door. It is a lead qualifying method that came out of the labs of IBM as a response to better understanding the needs of prospects and giving them a quick solution by putting them in a square whose 4 corners stand for Budget, Authority, Need, and Timeline. However, with the revolutionization of newly launched technological systems, many consider the BANT framework insufficient for quality leads.
By evaluating the four key factors of Budget, Authority, Need, and Time frame, BANT aims to identify leads who are most likely to convert into paying customers, allowing salespeople to prioritize their efforts and resources efficiently. Pretty straightforward – but is the BANT sales methodology effective?
While it might seem logical to put the prospect into a frame, the BANT framework can go wrong when dealt with incorrectly. A lead generation executive's endeavor to get the “boxes ticked” may result in an interrogative style of questions with no space for out-of-syllabus answers. So rather than working to understand the prospect’s situation, goals, and needs, lead gen reps simply use the framework as a checklist, asking one question for each dimension, for example: “What is your budget? Are you the person who’ll be signing off on this purchase?”
However, when executed effectively, BANT can serve as an internal compass, ensuring that all essential information is gathered to progress in the sales process. Each facet of the BANT methodology may encompass numerous questions that naturally arise during the course of conversation.
For instance, during a prospect conversation, the focus may shift to the Authority dimension. During this phase of the discussion, questions related to Authority should include:
The alluring simplicity of BANT:
BANT is like casting a net right where the fish drop into the ocean from the stream. It's quick, easy to set up, and focuses on bottom-of-the-funnel leads – those ready to buy, with wallets open and decisions primed. By asking pointed questions about their budget, decision-making authority, specific needs, and timeframe, you quickly identify the big, ready-to-convert fish. But this very attribute can be a shortcoming of BANT as we will find out next.
Recommended by LinkedIn
Shortcomings of BANT:
Using BANT, we may miss out on the prospects floating at the surface of the funnel. For that, we can perhaps use the support of an inbound process such as the waterfall method to cater to various stages of lead generation and lead nurturing. It leverages data gathered throughout the buyer's journey to create a multi-layered net. You cast content across all stages, attracting leads at various awareness levels. Then, analyze the data from each catch – which content attracted whom, what their needs were, and where they dropped off.
Thinking beyond BANT
Despite the technological advances today in which the buyer has most of the control, BANT can still be a very effective lead qualification tool.
These frameworks offer more contextual and nuanced approaches.
So is BANT enough? You already guessed It
While BANT provides a starting point, modern sales, especially those involving millennials in the decision-making process, require a more comprehensive and empathetic understanding of buyers' needs and journeys. Adapting or augmenting your approach with the suggestions above can lead to stronger relationships, better-qualified leads, and ultimately, increased sales success.