BLOODING THE WORLD

The bad decisions in dealing with the conflict with Russia in the Ukraine by NATO, left us as a result an inflation caused by the same sanctions that were expected to be bad for Russia.

But the Technical Team of the Russian Central Bank led by Elvira Nabiullina, who won awards all over the world with her awards for the best banker in the world and in Europe, after perfectly weathering the storm of similar sanctions in the Crimean conflict.

No one noticed from the West that the Russian movement contemplated sanctions against them and had ways to respond to more of them?

The sanctions only hit the countries that depend on their resources and directly attack the Western financial market that economically supports the rises in commodities that they do not have.

Russia lowers its interest rates by 14% and its economy is going through 18% year-on-year inflation, while Argentina in the American continent, far from the crisis and with the production of everything that Europe requires at its feet, is going through a scandalous +60% and a 90 % of the index to the producer (which is financed to produce with interest tied to the dollar).

FALSE PROMISES

The United States promises to offset Europe's move away from dependence on Russia, by shipping EXISTING? Gas reserves via LNG transportation.

The same LNG that had been removed from the list of renewables, as it is considered fossil energy.

REALITY

A methane tanker starts at 100,000 m3 to 266,000 m3, which is the maximum size that architecture based on maritime safety supports.

The "average" 74% of vessels are up to 180,000 m3 in size and the remaining 26% up to 266,000 m3.

If we put an average of 180,000 m3 per 600 methane tankers that exist in the world, the figure gives us 108,000,000 m3 of transport power.

If we know that the compression of the product is 600 times when returning its state of consumption, we would have to multiply 108 million m3 by 600, which gives us 64,800,000,000 m3 (although there are considerable atmospheric losses as in oil).

60 billion m3 is the annual consumption of Mexico.

Germany alone consumes 96 billion m3 of gas.

Apart from the fact that 11% of the ships are available and unloaded on western soil (the rest with contracts).

In other words, there are 7 billion m3 available.

CONSUMPTION

The European Community (countries included) consumes 490 billion m3 annually.

LOGISTICS

The price of moving 50 empty ships from Asia and taking them to the United States to load can increase the value between 16% and 19%.

Then you have to lower it in a regasification unit (which there are 4%) or in storage storage by 13% (which do not exist in those dimensions of need) because Germany and the West itself removed gas from the list of renewables for proceeding of fossils.

 In 2022, it was included again and the coal that was reused "we pretend to ignore what happens."

So it is a lie that they talk about the environment and that they will dispense with Russian energy, if they continue to buy it and in rubles.

Then we find Shell that generates profits 3 times more than its own annual projections and believes that by dividing among the few shareholders with profits the liquidation of dividends that gives them the profits of the war.

Wouldn't it be better if the companies that finance the war by buying from Russia compensate for the losses due to the rise in average international inflation? Or that they invest in the energy transition betting on projects that are waiting for a tangible investment.

Meanwhile, "They are bleeding the world dry for their ambitions".