Breaking: South Korea in Crisis as President Declares Martial Law
In a shocking development that has sent shockwaves through the Korean Peninsula, South Korean President Yoon Suk Yeol declared martial law on December 3, 2024. This extraordinary measure, not seen since South Korea's fraught journey toward democracy, has plunged the nation into an unprecedented constitutional crisis.
Yoon justified the move as necessary to "protect liberal democracy from anti-state forces," but critics argue it is a transparent power grab to undermine his political opponents. Struggling against an opposition-controlled parliament, the president has weaponized martial law in a perilous bid to consolidate his waning authority.
The martial law declaration includes sweeping and alarming provisions:
Recommended by LinkedIn
More troubling, the decree also permits arrests and detentions without warrants, evoking memories of South Korea's authoritarian past.
Despite Yoon's efforts to tighten his grip on power, the opposition in parliament retains a crucial constitutional countermeasure. Under Article 77 of South Korea's Constitution, a majority vote by the National Assembly can nullify martial law. In defiance of presidential attempts to block access to the chamber, the Assembly mustered 190 votes (including 18 from Yoon's ruling People Power Party) to lift martial law. This surpasses the required majority of the Assembly's 300 members, legally compelling the president to revoke the declaration.
Nevertheless, public protests continue to surge across the country, with citizens voicing their outrage against what they see as a blatant overreach by the executive branch. The days ahead will test the resilience of South Korea's democratic institutions and their ability to uphold democratic principles in the face of this authoritarian challenge.
X: solange_
Health Policy | Governor | Biosecurity
2wIts also important to note South Korean President Yoon Suk Yeol has always been seen as a controversial character since his presidential election campaign for the following reasons that come to mind (without going into detail at all): 1) he wrote the word 'king' on his palm during his election, which is a common practice in China and Korea before an exam/job interview to get 'good luck' but its more related to shamanism and people reaaally didn't like mixing beliefs with politics (South Koreans don't like shamanism mixing with politics because the first female president was controlled by a shaman/cult leader at the time when she was in power which ended up horribly - long story) , 2) when he was elected he moved out of the blue house costing tax papers an enormous sum, 3) a lot of people thought he was being 'controlled' by his wife, which added fuel to fire , a lot of conservatives didn't like that 4) he won by 0.8 percent, not a major difference, 5) turns out his wife lied on her resume, she falsified more than 20 work experiences&she didn't apologise which people really didn't like+threatened a journalist+accepted luxury goods+financial misconduct and people thought he was protecting his wife all the time