Bring Back the Suggestion Box!
With all the on-line surveys being conducted, you would think that companies would crave more employee and customer feedback, but the truth is that for the vast majority of companies the only kind of feedback they really want is the kind that can be quickly processed in an automated fashion. They want the kind of feedback you can get from those who agree to “take a brief survey after this call.”
Time and again, I find little faults with company products and services, and yet there’s nowhere to point these faults out to the company, just in case they might be interested in improving their product or correcting a mistake.
A recent experience with HP is a great case in point. The company has a whole host of printer models, and I’ve been a loyal printer customer of HP’s for years. But in their Officejet 4730 series, they made what amounts to a nearly comical error in how they provide instructions for printing out and using the “print alignment” page. For this particular home printer, every time you change ink cartridges you need to print out an alignment page, put it on the flatbed and allow the printer to align the ink cartridges again. If you have an HP inkjet home printer, you’re probably familiar with the process.
So I’ve printed alignment pages out for years, model after model, and I get the page out of the printer and I look carefully at the diagram to be sure that I place it on the flatbed with the correct orientation required to complete the alignment.
But here’s the way HP’s print alignment page for the 4730 series prints out:
Look at it carefully. Notice anything peculiar?
Two squares are at the bottom of the page, underneath the editorial and explanatory diagram, while three squares are at the top of the page. But now look at the instructions for placing the page on your flatbed, and you’ll see that in the illustration, the two squares are at the top of the page while the three squares are at the bottom. So which is it? Which is the correct way to align the page? Editorial at the bottom or two squares at the bottom?
The illustration of the page conflicts with the page itself, making the instructions self-contradictory, and I've aligned the page incorrectly more than once.
I tried my best to find some way to notify HP of this discrepancy, but apparently the company doesn’t really want to hear from its customers – or if they do, they really only want to hear from customers who are willing to sign up for more stuff (monthly ink delivery plans, promotional fru-fru and the like).
I googled “HP suggestions” and the only way to communicate this discrepancy to them seemed to be to do it through one of the HP community forums. So I went to one of the forums and tried to put up a new post, but you can't contribute until you log in. I was invited to log in via LinkedIn, but HP’s app didn’t take the correct login and password from my LinkedIn account. Then I tried Google+ and again, the correct Google+ email and password details were rejected by HP. At this point I gave up. I’m only willing to go so far to help a company monitor its own competence.
Sadly, I’m afraid this kind of experience is not unique to me. Or to HP. Lots of companies say they want to hear from their customers, but what they really mean is they want to hear from you as long as no human labor is required. Absolutely no human labor.
The remedy, folks, is to loosen the restraints. Make it easier for your customers to contact you. Let them contact you anonymously, even – yes, I actually said that! What do you have to lose? You certainly don’t have to make anonymous customer comments public, but wouldn’t you want to at least hear every customer suggestion? And if you could get a higher number of suggestions, or even complaints, by making it easier, then you’d be that much closer to improving your product and service.
So Hewlett Packard, if there’s anyone home at your company, anyone at all who’s monitoring the social media, here’s your chance to fix a small but annoying flaw in one of your products. No charge for my advice.
Suggestions? Feel free to email me: dpeppers@cxspeakers.com. I won’t make you complete a survey, and I won’t try to sell you anything.
Specializing in Packaging Design Execution, Comprehensive Artwork Development, and End-to-End Print Production Management. Contact me at: jruiz5@mac.com or direct message me on LinkedIn.
8yI'm with you on this, Don. Almost impossible to find anyone to give a suggestion to these days. I would think that an anonymous suggestion box (whether digital or physical) would be the cheapest way to get some immediate feedback on your product or service. Of course, you're going to have some pranksters and such, but there are many products and services that have some very real problems and there doesn't seem to be anyone to talk to about it.
Solvay Composite Materials "Retired" Training and Development
8yBack in the 80's & 90's Northrop Grumman gave you a percentage of the total cost savings on whatever you as an employee came up with to save the company money. It could be a tool that reduced manufacturing time or a change in the process. My first month (6/1985) at NG handed me a check for $896.00 for a small tool to drill out multiple F18 Tank Hangers all at once. This just made me look for more cost savings ideas.....
Customer Service & Logistics
8yAnother company I worked for implemented a Suggestion Box that one could earn $25 if they came up with a worthwhile cost-saving idea. In larger companies, many ideas get buried or ignored. I've always been a fan!
Author of "The Journey to WOW," helping companies around the world create outstanding customer experiences and leaders create outstanding teams.
8yDon - this is right on the money. We want quantifiable survey metrics, but please, please don't give customers our contact information. We don't actually want to TALK with anyone. God forbid! Thanks Shaun
Supporting ethical organisations | Providing safe, secure digital environments | Discovering & sharing best practice
8yI am constantly amazed by how difficult it is to provide feedback to most organisations. This increases the frustration level and results in negative feedback online which escalates the whole issue out of perspective. The Customer Experience is changing so quickly with technology it is difficult to keep pace. The concepts are the same, but measuring the Customer Experience is becoming more difficult with the proliferation of online review sites which dilute the brand profile and provide hundreds of places which must be monitored to protect the brand reputation.