A Call for CEOs and Officials to Step Up and Take On Health Inequalities
It’s a fact many Americans may be shocked to hear: We live shorter, sicker lives than people in other developed countries, despite the fact that we spend a lot more: nearly 17.5 percent of our gross domestic product in 2014. Not only that, there are there are steep health gaps within our borders – by income, education, race and ethnicity, geography, sexual identity and disability status, just for starters.
A landmark report released today by the National Academies of Sciences, Engineering and Medicine says these health inequities are costing us big time, from lost lives to squandered resources. And, perhaps most important, the report stresses that this is not a problem that doctors and patients alone can solve: Leaders from across sectors – education, transportation, housing, planning, business, and others – have critical, interwoven roles to play; ensuring that everyone has the opportunity to reach their full health potential is crucial for the nation’s economic and growth prospects, for its national security and for its communities’ well-being and vibrancy.
So, where to start? Health officials have known for a long time that social factors – the ways that our social and physical environment affect us – matter a lot more to our health than genetics or medical care. This new report reinforces that wisdom, and points to clear steps for businesses and other institutions with key roles in communities, like universities and hospitals.
First, these local institutions should make expanding opportunity in their communities a strategic priority, not just the responsibility of the community relations department. That means joining the mulitsector partnerships critical to positive change, the report notes. In Louisville, for example, local businesses – including the utility company and a major law firm – joined government agencies, community organizations, churches and educational partners to form a program to add 55,000 postsecondary degrees to the area by the year 2020. Those businesses recognize that a better-educated workforce is good for everyone.
In Camden, NJ, longtime corporate resident Campbell’s Soup committed to investing $1 million a year for ten years to cut childhood obesity and hunger by 50%. Local hospitals have stepped up, too, partnering with the Camden Coalition of Healthcare Providers, which uses real-time data to connect residents cycling in and out of emergency rooms with personal help to address their complex needs. The results of this “hotspotting” effort – with much of the important work happening outside the hospital – are healthier, happier people, and much lower costs.
Local policymakers play an important part, too. The report calls on them to work with the community to examine every potential project for unintended consequences that might increase inequities, starting with housing, land use, and transportation. It highlights efforts in Boston, where a committee of the Dudley Street Neighborhood Initiative reviews housing, open space, economic development and environmental proposals with just that lens.
And in Minneapolis, residents and community groups are collaborating with the police to prevent youth violence, while local health officials have partnered with 40 organizations on an obesity and tobacco prevention initiative that includes smoke-free housing units, corner stores stocked with produce, and a renowned infrastructure and culture of biking and walking.
These examples, and others highlighted in the Academies’ report, show just how important it is for all of a community to come together, and they give us a good model for getting started.
When Congress and President Lincoln created the National Academy of Sciences in 1863, they never could have imagined the America we live in now – but they were wise enough to know we’d always need the nation’s best scientific minds studying critical issues and guiding us on the best way forward.
More than a century and a half later, we would do well to heed their urgent call for health equity – from exam room to board room to City Hall – and to work together to make it happen.
Matroz
8yspeakin in right terms the situation is more complicate than.... a simpist fixture a nearby ..The.problem must be uber watched into.. space ...a bit doomed context..
Public/Population Health Nurse
8yThis is a nice document, but of which we need more community leaders to read, be empowered and act in a collaborative manner to focus on the determinants. There is even less emphasis in these areas given the changing atmosphere and in rural areas, the resistance to considering interventions at a community preventive level with community readiness level being less than at a zero stage.
Clinical Review Operations Specialist UnitedHealthcare Clinical Services – Population Health Management
8ySo, where to start? Health officials have known for a long time that social factors – the ways that our social and physical environment affect us – matter a lot more to our health than genetics or medical care. Addressing where we are and where we need to be regarding social determinants is the place to start and "start" means now. When we accept the 'fact' that social determinants contribute more to wellness than the existing model of look for disease, diagnose disease and prescribe medication, we will begin to generate completely different outcomes.
Basic Health Access
8yThe timing is excellent for several major works. We have the chance to grasp the incredible costs of designs in health, education, economics, and other areas that worsen disparities. We now understand that 300 million to advance disruptive change over 10 years has had minimal impact. We are beginning to understand that tens of billions more each year added to health care costs for medical error/quality measurement/digitalization focus are moving us in the opposite direction from value. As of Jan 10, 2017 we now have a good indication from Annals of Internal Medicine that Pay for Performance has been a costly and disruptive experimentation. This review of dozens of articles is important as the authors and journals have tended to write and publish those supportive of Pay for Performance. Clearly we have heard little else other than positive promotions. In one other area, we need to embrace the evidence - the area of lack of evidence for board certification activities. It could be a new era in health care, with transformations consistent with the evidence. Clearly we can move away from disruption and toward collaboration. The transformations that must occur are 1. An incredibly important return to the support of the team members that deliver the care rather than continued disruption and "us vs them" divisions made worse with Pay for Performance. 2. A greater understanding of the true determinants of health as shaped in people long before health care encounters, during encounters, and after encounters. 3. A return to collaborative care across facilities, practices, communities. administration, and those who deliver care. 4. A resolve never to embrace disruptive change involving human subjects or human populations without substantial evidence of beneficent intent, without protection of vulnerable populations, and without informed consent or reasonable understanding regarding the benefits and consequences. We must invest in people to improve health outcomes. We must invest in the people who most invest in people to improve outcomes. We must not spend so much upon clinical interventions and digital clinical interventions that we fail to invest in people.
Digital Product Manager Lead at Carelon
8yDoes this include the CEOs of insurance companies?