Canada's Interest Rate Conundrum: Balancing Inflation and Economic Growth
Understanding the Economic Downturn Triggered by the Pandemic
The COVID-19 pandemic deeply disrupted the global economy, leading to severe contractions in economic activity as countries implemented lockdowns and restrictions. Supply chains were disrupted, causing shortages and inflation in various sectors. Unemployment rates soared as businesses got closed or reduced operations. Employment in Canada dropped by nearly 20%, from its peak in January 2020 to its lowest point in May 2020, resulting in the loss of approximately 3.4 million jobs. This decline was steeper compared to the United States, where employment dropped by just over 14%, equating to 22.4 million jobs lost during the same period. The impact of lockdowns was thus more pronounced in Canada's labor market than in the U.S.
Bank of Canada and Federal Government’s Stimulus Measures
At that time, the federal government and Bank of Canada (BoC) both took various initiatives to stimulate the economy. In March 2020, the BoC rapidly reduced its policy interest rate to its effective lower bound, cutting it from 1.75% to 0.25%. This was intended to lower borrowing costs and stimulate economic activity. BoC also started Quantitative Easing (#QE) under which a large-scale asset purchase program was launched, including buying government bonds and other financial assets to inject liquidity into the financial system to lower long-term interest rates and improve market functioning. Further, several emergency lending programs were introduced by BoC to support liquidity and credit, including the Standing Term Liquidity Facility (STLF) and the Provincial Bond Purchase Program (PBPP) to ensure that businesses and provinces had access to needed funds.
In addition, the Canadian government rolled out substantial direct financial assistance to individuals and businesses, including the Canada Emergency Response Benefit (CERB), wage subsidies, and loan programs for businesses to support incomes and preventing widespread bankruptcies. Further, significant increases in public spending were directed towards healthcare, social services, and infrastructure projects to support the economy and create jobs.
Economic Principles Underpinning Stimulus Measures
Governments and Central Banks use fiscal policies and monetary policies to manage economic activity, stabilize prices, and maintain employment rate.
Monetary policy refers to the actions undertaken by central banks to control the money supply and achieve macroeconomic goals such as controlling inflation, consumption, growth, and liquidity. Key components of monetary policy include setting policy rates, open market operations, setting reserve requirements, and quantitative easing. First, central banks set benchmark interest rates (such as the federal funds rate in the U.S. or the overnight rate in Canada). Second, Open Market Operations (OMO) involve the buying and selling of government securities in the open market to control money supply into the banking system and managing liquidity. Third, central banks can alter the minimum reserves required to be held by banks against deposits. Finally, Quantitative Easing is an unconventional policy to be used under exceptional circumstances like economic slowdown in COVID-19 pandemic. This involves large-scale purchases of financial assets, particularly long-term securities, to inject liquidity directly into the economy. Expansionary monetary policies are implemented to stimulate economic growth, which involve lowering interest rates, making borrowing cheaper and encouraging investment and consumption or using quantitative easing. On the other hand, central banks use contractionary monetary policies to combat inflation and cool down an overheated economy by raising the rates, making borrowing more expensive to curb the demand and spending.
Fiscal policy involves the use of government spending and taxation to influence the economy. It is managed by the government rather than a central bank. Key components include government spending on infrastructure, education, defence, healthcare, and social programs; changes in tax rates and tax laws to influence consumer and business behavior; and public debt management involving decisions about the issuance and servicing of government debt. Expansionary fiscal policies are used by governments including increasing public spending and cutting taxes to inject money into the economy, boosting demand. Increased government spending can stimulate economic growth, especially during a recession and vice versa.
Expansionary policies can lead to higher economic output and lower unemployment rates. They are particularly effective in combating recessions. However, if overused, they can lead to overheating in the labor market and economy. Labor market heating occurs when there is a significant increase in demand for labor leading to lower unemployment rates and higher wages as businesses compete for a limited supply of workers. While this can be beneficial in reducing unemployment and increasing income, it can also contribute to inflationary pressures if wage growth outpaces productivity. Whereas contractionary policies can induce a recession if implemented too aggressively. High interest rates can stifle business investment and consumer spending, leading to higher unemployment. Balancing these policies is crucial for maintaining economic stability and avoiding the adverse effects of overheating or economic stagnation. This is what central banks do. This is what governments do (re: economics).
Impacts of Post-Pandemic Expansionary Fiscal and Monetary Policies
Now that we understand expansionary and contractionary policies, let's discuss what actions did the BoC and Canadian Government employed post pandemic. The BoC and the government deployed extensive expansionary monetary and fiscal policies to deal with the economic downturn triggered by the pandemic. The combination of low interest rates and substantial fiscal support led to a rapid recovery in consumer demand once restrictions were eased in 2021. However, supply chains were still disrupted, creating mismatches between demand and supply, which pushed prices up across various sectors, i.e., the Aftermath.
Most economists underestimated both the scale and persistence of the surge in commodity prices that began in 2021. The pandemic caused significant disruptions beyond the usual shocks to food and energy prices, notably in markets for new and used vehicles. Increased liquidity and low interest rates fueled asset price inflation, particularly in the housing market. Rising housing costs contributed to broader inflationary pressures as higher rents and property prices fed into the cost of living, i.e., the Aftermath part 2.
Shifts in consumer demand from services to goods, combined with supply chain issues, led to shortages and price increases in certain sectors without corresponding decreases in others. These sectoral mismatches between demand and supply were more persistent and severe than anticipated, ultimately triggering a significant rise in inflation.
BoC had successfully maintained inflation within its target range of 2% to 3% for the past 30 years. Given the labor market heating occurred due to BoC and the government’s measures, inflation surged to its highest levels in Canada in in 2021 (3.40%) and 2022 (6.80%), since 1992, exceeding the BoC's long-standing target range.
2022 – Addressing Labor Market Overheating and Inflation
To curb the rising demand and control the overheated labor markets, both BoC and the Canadian Government tightened their policies. Starting in early 2022, BoC increased the rate from its pandemic low of 0.25% to 5% by mid-2023 in a series of policy decisions. These rate hikes aimed to make borrowing more expensive, thereby reducing consumer spending and business investment, which in turn would help cool down the economy and labor market. The BoC concluded its quantitative easing program and adjusted its forward guidance to signal a tighter monetary policy stance, indicating that further rate increases were likely until inflation showed sustained signs of returning to the 2% target. This helped manage expectations and influence economic behavior accordingly.
While the BoC focused on monetary tightening, the Canadian government took steps towards fiscal restraint to complement these efforts by scaling back some of the pandemic-era support programs that had significantly increased public spending and contributed to higher demand in the economy. The government redirected public spending towards areas that could enhance productivity and long-term economic growth, only.
Recommended by LinkedIn
2023 – Impact of Tightened Monetary and Fiscal Policies
One of the primary goals of the contractionary policies was to bring down inflation, and these measures showed results in late-2023. Inflation rates began to decline from their peak levels in 2022, moving closer to the BoC's target range of 2% to 3%.
The increase in interest rates had a pronounced impact on the housing market. Mortgage rates rose, leading to decreased affordability for homebuyers and a subsequent decline in housing sales and prices. This slowdown in the housing market had a broader impact on related industries, such as construction and real estate services. Consequently, high interest rates limited economic activity by curbing consumer demand and the economy struggled to grow. In 2023, Canadian economy nearly avoided a recession amid economic slowdown as real GDP only grew by 1.8% (against 2022: 3.8%) driven by growing population and decline in per capita output and high interest rates.
The slowdown in economic activity led to a slight increase in unemployment rates. As businesses adjusted to higher interest rates and reduced consumer demand, some sectors experienced layoffs and hiring freezes. However, the unemployment rate remained relatively low compared to historical averages, indicating a still-tight labor market.
2024 – Current Economic Landscape
The economy of Canada rebounded in the start of the current year from a prolonged period of stagnation; however, the GDP growth rate was lower than expected amid the high interest rate landscape. The GDP report was issued by StatsCan on May 31st. According to the report, after posting no change in the last quarter of 2023, the real GDP grew at an annualized rate of 1.7% in the first quarter of 2024, which was lower as compared to the market expectations (Analysts: 2.2%, Bank of Canada Estimate: 2.8%). According to StatsCan, the economy expanded by 0.3% in April on a month-on-month basis after stagnating in March. The GDP growth forecast for the fourth quarter has been revised down from 1.0% to 0.1%. This significant revision indicates a slowdown in the economy, suggesting weaker economic activity than initially estimated.
BOC is gradually approaching its target inflation rate of 2.0%, reverting from an all-time high of 8.0% (monthly) in the last quarter of 2022. The year-on-year CPI was 2.7% in June, down from 2.9% in April. This deceleration mainly came from food prices, services, and durable goods.
With the tremendous progress towards the target inflation rate and a lower-than-expected economic growth in the first quarter of the current year, the BoC has cut the interest rate by 25 basis points in June 2024, bringing it down to 4.75%. This makes Canada the first G7 country to lower rates following the global cycle of rate hikes. However, the economy is still struggling, the unemployment rate increased to 6.4% in June from 6.2% in May, primarily due to a significant population growth (as we mentioned in this post: click here to read).
2024 – Going Forward
Next policy decision of BoC is coming out tomorrow and a vast majority of economists is expecting a 25 basis points reduction in policy rate bringing it down to 4.50%. This is not high time for the BoC to manage the adverse impacts of high interest rates while inflation is has relatively cooled down and unemployment rates are edging higher, with the economy still struggling to grow. This move may aim to balance the risks of too-high interest rates with the stringent need to avoid reigniting inflation. A rate cut now could provide the necessary boost for economic recovery while managing the challenges posed by the current economic condition.
Sources
ACCA Finalist
5moGreat work ♥️
Ex-Fixed Income trader |MBA Candidate- Schulich School of Business, York University
5moThe difference between the way the central bank and the government control/influence the economy is well put. The current scenario of unemployment and lower growth is the expected outcome of the contractionary policies. I believe the economy may have underperformed than expected due to unorganised migration policies.Going forward , the steps taken by both the central bank and the government will be crucial in ensuring the expected bounce back of the economy. Another thing to look at is the limit and risk of divergence between the BoC and the Fed. Great work Schulich Finance Association!
Strategic Financial Analyst | Project Development & Transaction Advisory | Corporate Finance & Public Sector Expert
5moGood Work Miss Ayesha Malik
Lead Finance Analyst at Tawzea (IWDC) | Ex Grant Thornton | Strategy & Transactions | ACCA | Nationwide Distinction Holder in "Business Analysis" | CFA Level 2 Candidate
5moSuper insightful
Accounting & Finance l M&A | Corporate Finance
5mo"Excellent analysis! Insights on the economic factors at play are spot on. Particularly appreciate explaining the role of monetory and fiscal policies and relating it to Canada’s economic journey so far since Covid. To achieve the sustainable level of interest rates, it could go till 2026. However, we will be able to see the improving economy going onwards.