Charts of the Week: Dual Tailwinds – Sectors
Market headwinds are typically pretty visible. We could probably name a bunch off the top of our heads – geopolitical risk, potential for tax changes, some increasing input costs, high earnings expectations, election cycle volatility - to name a few. The problem with each of those variables is that it’s hard to prove (via history) that there’s a consistent impact on market returns. That’s not to say the issues don’t matter – they do. But many times, the market either discounts bad news in advance or another critical variable creates a tailwind that you’re not watching (perhaps because you are too busy focusing on the very visible headwinds). To me, the latter looks to be happening as we speak. Crude and rates are both down over the last year, together by a top decile amount.
This is rare without job loss. And this has been consistently predictive for the market throughout the decades. The bigger the “stimulus” from those joint forces, the more likely the market is to be higher, with returns over the last 25 years averaging almost 20%. Why? Because these factors matter for future earnings growth. Since 1962, earnings also grew an average of 20% the year following moves like this. If you’re highly skeptical of lofty earnings expectations, the consistency of this correlation should give you pause.
The consistent impact doesn’t stop with earnings growth or the economy (ISM shows a similar pattern). The bigger the “stimulus” from rates & oil, the more likely economically sensitive sectors are to outperform the market. The relationship is quite linear, with sectors like Discretionary, Tech & Financials outperforming the market by an average of 3-5% over the following year. On the oppositive side of the ledger, defensive sectors, like Utilities, Health Care & Staples, typically underperform the market by an average of 4-8%. That is a lot of numbers to illustrate the cyclical, pro-risk impulse that typically occurs. Which sectors specifically have the most persistent trends? Real Estate on the positive side.
Recommended by LinkedIn
Utilities on the negative side. If this historical analysis is a guide, the recent defensive rotation we’ve seen might not have much staying power. And, if you’re looking for “what’s different this time” in our easing cycle – this is one of the critical datapoints. And it’s bullish.
This information is provided for educational purposes only and is not a recommendation or an offer or solicitation to buy or sell any security or for any investment advisory service. The views expressed are as of the date indicated, based on the information available at that time, and may change based on market or other conditions. Opinions discussed are those of the individual contributor, are subject to change, and do not necessarily represent the views of Fidelity. Fidelity does not assume any duty to update any of the information.
Mortgage Professional helping clients navigate innovative home financing💰solutions. Over 20 years experience, thousands of happy homeowners!😊✨🏡
5moSuper informative. Thanks for sharing! 🙂
Investment Strategy Leader | Chief Investment Officer at Move Asset Management
5moThe unsuspecting right tail. Very insightful Denise Chisholm
Nice note about the stimulative effects of lower rates and oil prices. Of course, those are down due to slower or decline in economic growth. Does the current level of stimulus counterbalance the decline in economic growth? We’ll see. Speaking of stimulus, how to factor in $1.9T of federal deficits to economic growth figures? It would normally be hard to see a recession occurring with deficits of that level.
USPS
5moThis is very clarifying and encouraging. Thanks Denise.
Senior Portfolio Manager, Senior Investment Advisor at Canaccord Genuity Wealth Management
5moThank you excellent piece