Climate Change Gets Personal
The climate change conference in Paris wrapped up on Saturday. Over the previous two weeks there had been an array of commitments by governments around the World, including the UK’s, to tackle the climate change phenomenon and reduce the emissions that contribute to it. But what action are we all going to take as individuals?
My family and I gave up eating meat for four weeks in the lead-up to and during the conference. We went from being heavy meat eaters to being pescatarian (i.e. eating fish but not meat), a term I had not previously come across. This was part of a climate challenge across the UK’s diplomatic network in Canada. Our Consul General in Vancouver did likewise, whilst others walked to work.
You might ask why give up eating meat? A recent study by Chatham House, a UK think tank, put livestock’s contribution to global emissions at 15%, higher than the 14% contributed by all forms of transport. This might sound surprising until you realise we are farming 60 billion animals per year to produce meat, milk and eggs. Livestock emissions contain methane, nitrous dioxide and carbon dioxide. But not all livestock has an equal impact. According to the UN’s Food and Agriculture Organisation (FAO), cattle are responsible for 65% of all livestock emissions, in large part because of the methane they produce. By contrast pigs and chickens are responsible for 9% and 8% respectively.
These cows at the Ellinbank Dairy Research Centre in Victoria, Australia, wear backpacks that measure their methane output. (Photo: Agriculture Victoria)
I estimate that my family of four’s commitment has saved about 275 kg of CO2, or roughly enough for the family to fly half-way back to London from Montreal. There have been challenges. Try explaining to a two-year old that he can’t have sausages because he has to reduce his carbon footprint. Nurseries tend not to provide vegetarian menus. If you’re attending formal dinners, you generally have to order a vegetarian option in advance. And booking a restaurant in Montreal with a decent range of non-meat options proved harder than expected. But there have also been significant positives. Our grocery bill has definitely gone down and we feel healthier for eating less meat.
World Economic Forum @wef Can eating less meat really tackle #climatechange? http://wef.ch/1N9aIwp #environment #COP21
This is no coincidence. Excessive meat consumption contributes to obesity, cancer and type 2 diabetes. The latter is a personal concern, given that it runs in my family. A high meat diet is classified as consuming over 100g per day. People in the US consume over 250g per day on average or four times the recommended amount, with Europe not far behind. Global meat consumption is also rising rapidly, at a rate of 75% with the number of livestock animals set to double by 2050. Yet there seems to be very little awareness of the impact that this will have.
There is a role for governments to address this and to help shift attitudes towards eating less meat. We’ve had commitments on cleaner transport: both the UK and Québec have joined the Zero Emission Vehicle (ZEV) Alliance, with the UK committing to almost all cars and vans being zero emission by 2050. A next step could be a strong commitment on cleaner diets.
Scientists can play an invaluable role too. Sir Paul Nurse, former President of the Royal Society and Nobel Prize winner, was in Montreal earlier this week extolling the virtue of science in collecting a large body of objective data. Scientists have already established a body of evidence to show that climate change is happening and it is induced by human activity. The more evidence that eating less meat is both healthier and more environmentally friendly, the better.
Now that Paris has finished and with it our challenge, will my family continue cutting out meat from our diet? Not entirely. But we will try to eat less, particularly red meat. I’m encouraged by the government commitments made in Paris, and the engagement by civil society, the media and business to tackle climate change. But what action are we all going to take as individuals? Reducing our meat consumption is a good place to start, not only to improve the planet’s health, but our own. And whilst we’re at it we might all save a bit of cash to support our longer, healthier lives.
Bridging the Language Gap within Organizations Through Customized Online Language Programs | Serving Companies Worldwide 🌏 Helping People Communicate Better Internally and with Their Clients
9yThere are so many varieties of proteins available to us (meat, fish and vegetables). Cutting out red meat is a simple sacrifice, and so much better for our health, pocketbooks and peace of mind.
Founder/Principal at Achieve Sustainability Inc. | I help SMEs embed sustainability to boost their competitive advantage| Community Climate Literacy Funder| Connector |GSD| Heat Pump Fan
9yI think it's great that more people are writing and talking about the environmental impacts of eating meat, especially beef. Eating less or no beef is certainly a simple thing that most people can do to lower their carbon footprint. It's also better for our health and pocketbooks.
🔶 Critical friend 🔶 Strategic advisor 🔶Trusted leader
9yYou highlight neatly how imperative personal acts and choices are Nick, well done. Governments and industries and institutions will all make choices to enable the decarbonised world which we need. Consumers, shoppers, citizens, fellow human beings - all need to make choices to reduce their impacts also. Check out the growing body of lifestyle information about flexitarian approaches to eating.
Helping business leaders transform, innovate, get aligned and create impact.
9yGreat commitment nick - so inspiring to see.
Advisor - Planned Giving CHUM Foundation
9yMerci pour cet article bien articulé. Bravo pour votre initiative familiale.