Communicating With Engineers
Most everyone knows that communications and collaborative thinking within organizations can be a challenge. One of the most critical areas where these communication and collaboration barriers need to be overcome is between engineering design teams and safety professionals.
Commonality in Cause
Luckily, safety professionals and engineers have an important thing in common – a focus on a systems approach to design. A systems approach demands that both safety professionals and engineers analyze problems in appropriate contexts and produce solutions that help prevent hazards and hazardous conditions from being averted both for the mechanical and work systems and in the environment that demands safety for the workers tasked with the system’s use, modification, maintenance, and integration into or alongside other
By looking beyond apparent problems to consider the entire system as well as the discrete system components, designers can expose root causes and avoid merely treating symptoms. They can then tackle deeper problems and be more likely to find effective solutions. Therefore, good lines of communication between engineers and safety professionals are essential, and a common environment of respect and communication be established.
Conflicting Goals
The disconnect in communication comes because those system approaches have different end goals and purposes:
Although the design thinking and priorities might appear vastly different, the concept that is trying to be achieved by both safety professionals and engineers is – “when in doubt, design it out.”
Engineers look at the world differently from non-engineers. They are usually extremely logical, pragmatic, and direct, while safety professionals have many of these same qualities, there tends to be emotional and aspirational components to designing out hazards. After all, saving lives is a highly emotional pursuit and one that safety professionals hold as a primary goal of their employment. Unfortunately, when working together, these different perspectives present unique communication challenges that can slow work, deliver sub-optimal results, and weaken company culture if not addressed.
Prevention through Design
Prevention through Design (PtD) is the primary way that engineers and safety professionals can come together to do the most that they can as a team to identify, investigate, mitigate, or design out hazards before they become a problem during operations. PtD can help formulate an operational risk management system, such as 30-60-90 percent design reviews that focus on collaboration and input from all stakeholders (including safety and engineering) and ensuring that these stakeholders are engaged with each other throughout the project on critical design features and changes throughout the project.
Collaborating effectively with an engineer, or any other team member for that matter, means learning to communicate with a common language of respect and inclusion. Observing group dynamics, identifying individual priorities or concerns, and adapting your communication style when working with engineers and others is critical to overall hazard identification, risk management, and hazard mitigation success.
Recommended by LinkedIn
Successful Collaboration and Communication Tips
Here are a few basics for collaborating and communicating productively with engineers and other varied stakeholders.
Conclusion
The workplace today is increasingly diverse. It is important to understand not just differences in professional expertise but also the professional cultures and languages that influence communication, interaction, and thinking modalities. To effectively communicate with your stakeholders, especially engineers, safety professionals do not need to learn a litany of other languages, but it is helpful to speak the same language on a similar level.
Need help establishing and implementing an advanced safety management system within your organization?
Mariner Gulf & Consulting and Services has extensive experience in establishing safety management systems that are intended to maximize the overall safety and health of the workplace for organizations in every industry. We can assist with the programmatic components of evaluating potential high-hazard producing processes and assist your efforts in ensuring that each and every worker is able to come home safe at the end of the day.
James Junkin, CSP, MSP, SMS, ASP, CSHO is the Chief Executive Officer for Mariner-Gulf Consulting & Services, Chair of the Veriforce Strategic Advisory Board, master trainer, and keynote speaker.
Contact Information:
James A. Junkin, CSP, MSP, SMS, CSHO
james@marinergulf.com
504-373-0678
Principal Consultant
1yGood article. It is important to note that many safety professionals are in fact engineers. The other factor to consider is educating engineers in our colleges and universities in safety engineering principles and practices. This would enhance these educated individuals in the goal of safety and health to protect employees, customers, and the public in the need for reducing risk and controlling hazards. It is not complicated, it requires engineering schools to include safety, risk and safety systems management in the curriculum. I have been fortunate to be able to teach Intro to Safety Engineering at the University of Pittsburgh Swanson School of Engineering with my colleague and friend Joel Haight. The course is offered in a certificate program but the past two semesters have included seniors in engineering and graduate level students. Engineers are great fun. I am blessed to be able to teach this course and influence safety and health through these excellent young folks. Thanks Professor Haight and the University.Hail to Pitt.
We always appreciate you sharing your wisdom with us, James!