Comparing SIW Resonator Types And Their Impact to RF Performance

Comparing SIW Resonator Types And Their Impact to RF Performance

SynMatrix will soon release support for substrate-integrated waveguide (SIW) filter structures using automatic 3D geometry workflows in Ansys HFSS. The research and development process to prepare this capability has been thorough - yet enlightening - as we complete the final touches on the interface.

Part of the R&D engineering process to develop a comprehensive library of tools and guidelines for SIW structures has yielded a comparison analysis of different types of SIW resonator shapes, some of which we would like to share publicly (Fig1).

No alt text provided for this image
Figure 1.

There were two types we compared: A perimeter resonator design and the commonly-used open loop resonator (Fig2)

No alt text provided for this image
FIgure 2.


Each of these resonator types have different size and performance characteristics as summarized in the following table (Fig3):

No alt text provided for this image
Figure 3.

This can be further elaborated when we evaluate the S-Parameter curve for each of these resonator types noting the unloaded Q and how this relates to the form factor of each resonator type (see Fig4):

No alt text provided for this image
Figure 4.

Each scenario was evaluated at a central frequency of 30GHz with 10% BW, return loss of 20dB, and one transmission zero located at the higher side. Considering the wideband application with the I/O loading effect, the loaded Q will be 80% of the unloaded Q. The overall RF performance is shown above marked with center and band edge insertion loss values; under conservative considerations, 0.1-0.2 dB loss may also be added due to the I/O connection.

Readers can clearly see the impact of each of the different resonator types, particularly the impact to Q and insertion loss. 

A fantastic work from our great team.

Like
Reply

To view or add a comment, sign in

Insights from the community

Others also viewed

Explore topics