In Consideration of the Role of Data
“People don’t know what they want until you show it to them. That’s why I never rely on market research. Our task is to read things that are not yet on the page.” — Steve Jobs
I will come back to this comment from Steve Jobs, but I want to take an idea for a short walkabout that leads back to this concept as it relates to the role of data.
Let's start with the notion of data
Last week I had a conversation with my new friend over at Huge, the brilliant Emily Wengert. Her new role over at Huge, is as the Managing Director, Global ECD, Experiential. (Follow her - I believe you will like what she is doing.)
One of the discussion points we had, was around the subject of 'data'. I came to the conversation having just listened to her interview with José Manuel Simián.
"My palette has become data, which is really different than... than maybe before when it was boxes and arrows, maybe when I first started, and then it became kind of gradients and fonts, and different things, and the materialism of design. But now I think its data, and so data is my new pixel. I'm really thinking about, and I have to know and understand that. And so, a lot of what we do is (I'm going to come back to it), is - story telling to each other. What do we want this data to be doing for people, and how many stories we can tell, and then turning that into systems of logic, and systems and guardrails, and thinking about it in terms of where does intelligence belong in this experience. Which is another really important question. Which is that, AI shouldn't be everywhere. It doesn't need to be in all steps, or the kind of AI you use, isn't always generative." - Emily Wengert
So this is the balancing act. While data is immensely valuable for providing insights and guiding strategies, it’s not always straightforward. There’s an art to interpreting data beyond its face value. As I shared of Emily's comment regarding her own personal transformation in her approach to design, emphasizing data’s pivotal role in crafting user experiences. Her insights offer a compelling starting point for rethinking how we integrate data into our creative and strategic processes, but I believe that data that is accurately gauged is important, but it must be constantly measured to show accuracy.
My thoughts around data, is that it tells us what is (up to a point), not what it could be. It’s often retrospective, analyzing past behaviors and trends. Innovation, on the other hand, often requires looking beyond current trends and anticipating what users will want before they know it themselves.
How has over-reliance on data hindered innovation in the past?
My first thought is of Swatch Watches from when I was in middle school - and how as a TREND, this was a permanent run for the rubber-band brand was set for life, but the trend died as fast as it came. Same for Fidget Spinners, Cabbage Patch Dolls and Tickle Me Elmo.
Here are a few relevant market study examples:
1 • Kodak’s Missed Digital Opportunity:
2 • Blockbuster Ignoring Streaming Trends:
3 • New Coke’s Market Research Failure:
4 • Nokia’s Smartphone Hesitation:
Recommended by LinkedIn
5 • BlackBerry’s Decline:
6 • Swatch Watches and Fad Products:
7 • Sears’ E-commerce Neglect:
8 • The Music Industry’s Digital Resistance:
Key Insights:
Data as the new Pixel?
Emily's approach, treating data as a “new pixel,” suggests a sophisticated and nuanced use of data, integrating it deeply into the design and decision-making process but not letting it dictate every step. Her focus on storytelling and systems of logic to guide the application of data in experience design is particularly insightful. It emphasizes using data to enhance human experiences rather than letting it dominate them. The trick - is the balance.
The idea that “AI shouldn’t be everywhere” and that its use needs to be thoughtful and selective is another critical point. This approach prevents over-reliance on generative AI systems and ensures that human creativity and insight remain at the forefront of branding and marketing strategies.
In the recent ages experienced of the Web 1.0 and 2.0, every measurable was used to gauge the decision making process and evaluate the effectiveness of activities based on vanity metrics (views, likes, comments, shares) rather than actual sales and user engagement with products and services. The thing with having measurable insight (ie - data) is it gives the marketer a sense that they have insight on the blind spots that John Wanamaker spoke about:
“Half the money I spend on advertising is wasted; the trouble is I don't know which half.” - John Wanamaker, American marketer
Insight from data though, is past looking.
The challenge then, let me state it again, is to strike the right balance: leveraging data to inform decisions without stifling innovation and creativity. This means continuously questioning and validating the data, ensuring it serves the vision rather than confining it.
This brings us back to Steve Jobs’ insightful observation: ‘People don’t know what they want until you show it to them…’ Like Jobs, we must recognize that while data illuminates the path already traveled, innovation requires us to venture into uncharted territory. It’s about reading ‘things that are not yet on the page,’ about anticipating needs and desires that data alone cannot reveal.
In a world dominated with data, let’s remember 2 key things: numbers tell only part of the story and the human element—our creativity, intuition, and vision—is what transforms data into meaningful innovation. It’s about seeing not just what is, but what could be. Use data as a compass, not a map—as a tool to inform our journey, not dictate it.
It’s time to transcend the numbers and embrace the art of possibility. Let’s challenge ourselves to envision and create what doesn’t yet exist, meeting needs people haven’t even realized they have. As we leverage data in our strategies, let it serve as a foundation upon which we build—not a box that confines us. The most remarkable advancements emerge when we dare to imagine the unseen and bring it to life. After all, the most groundbreaking innovations arise not from data alone, but from a profound understanding of the human experience.
Brian Sykes - Emily Wengert wrote: ""My palette has become data, which is really different than... before when it was boxes and arrows gradients and fonts, and the materialism of design." Brian - thanks for the post -- what do you think she means by "data?" I mean when you get an electric bill or get a text from a candidate, that's data in the bigger sense. Our brains process lots of data all the time. What data is she talking about? I think when you mention guardrails, it reflects your hope that there will be room for overruling the conclusions that the models are coming to. I suspect also that the data types will challenge any skill we humans claim as being exclusively our domain. Pointing to when data failed in the past will not stop the modelers from assuring you that won't happen in the future. They are still claiming amazing predictive powers. And to tell the truth we are not that good at predicting ourselves. I love Steve Job's blank page. But it looks like a lot of money is being spent to give that blamk page to "data."
How can I help?
2moMost decisions aren’t data driven. If they were—the would would be a MUCH different place.
I Teach Creative Pros to UNDERSTAND / INTEGRATE AI while Retaining the Human Element | AI Consultant + AI Educator for Creative Professionals | Keynote Speaker
2moWhen data drives decision-making, it's essential to scrutinize the criteria measured and assess the human impact. A human-centric approach ensures we balance hard data with ethical and cultural considerations, creating solutions that are not only effective but also empathetic and inclusive. Committee think often acts as a bottleneck to innovation, as groups tend to prioritize known-safe options and hesitate to venture beyond the familiar. This risk-averse mindset can stifle forward-thinking and limit the potential for breakthrough ideas.