The Environmental Impact of AI: Unveiling the Water Footprint
Graphic Design written AI Water Footprint - A Hidden Environment Cost

The Environmental Impact of AI: Unveiling the Water Footprint


Keypoints

Environmental Impact of AI: Highlighting AI's water and carbon footprints.

Model Training: Significant water use for energy and cooling, with GPT-3 using ~700,000 liters.

Global Water Crisis: By 2027, AI could use 4.2-6.6 billion cubic meters of water annually.

Measuring Water Use: Focus on operational and embedded water footprints.

Corporate Responsibility: Companies aim to be "water positive" by 2030 but need detailed reporting.

Sustainable Solutions: Greener data centers, smart task scheduling, and water restoration support.

Sustainable Future: Balancing AI innovation with responsible resource use.


A Thirsty AI

We have heard a lot about the carbon footprint of artificial intelligence (AI). But there's another crucial aspect that's been flying under the radar: the water footprint. Let's take a closer look at how AI impacts our water resources, what this means for corporate sustainability, and how we can make AI more environmentally friendly in the future.

I recently wrote an article about the environmental costs of AI development and a potential economic bubble related to these costs. Now, I want to share some insights from a review by Pengfei et al. (2023) titled "Making AI Less 'Thirsty': Uncovering and Addressing the Secret Water Footprint of AI Models." This review highlights how AI's water consumption affects not only the environment and freshwater availability but also the advancement of this groundbreaking technology as it pushes the limits of natural resource use.

The Hidden Water Cost of AI Models

You might be surprised to learn just how much water goes into developing and training large-scale AI models like GPT-3. These models are typically trained in data centers that need massive amounts of water for energy generation and cooling their servers. To put it in perspective, training GPT-3 alone can directly evaporate about 700,000 liters of water (Pengfei et al., 2023). That's enough to fill a small lake!

Balancing Carbon and Water Footprints

We often hear about making AI more carbon-efficient, but water efficiency is a whole different ball game. Here's the tricky part: sometimes, efforts to reduce carbon emissions can actually increase water usage. This happens because the energy mix used and local weather conditions play a big role in water consumption. For example, cooling towers use a lot more water when it's hot outside (Pengfei et al., 2023). So, we can't just focus on carbon – we need to look at the bigger picture.

A Global Water Crisis in the Making?

The scale of AI's water consumption is staggering when you zoom out to a global level. By 2027, the world's AI systems could be using something between 4.2 to 6.6 billion cubic meters of water annually (Pengfei et al., 2023). That's more than some countries use in a year. This is especially concerning given that many parts of the world are already facing water scarcity and dealing with aging water infrastructure.

How Do We Measure AI's Thirst?

To get a handle on this problem, we need to accurately measure AI's water footprint. This involves looking at two main areas:

  1. Operational Water Footprint: This includes water used directly at the data center (on-site) and water used to generate the energy powering the center (off-site). The amount varies based on factors like temperature, humidity, and the types of energy sources used (Pengfei et al., 2023).
  2. Embedded Water Footprint: This accounts for the water used to manufacture the AI servers themselves. We spread this amount over the expected lifespan of the server to get a more accurate picture (Pengfei et al., 2023).

Corporate Responsibility and Transparency

Many big tech companies like Google, Microsoft, and Meta have sustainability programs aimed at reducing their environmental impact. Some have even pledged to become "water positive" by 2030, meaning they'll replenish more water than they use (Google, 2023; Microsoft, 2023; Meta, 2023).

However, there's still a lack of detailed information about water usage in many corporate sustainability reports. This makes it hard to drive real innovation in water conservation. We need more standardized and comprehensive reporting on water usage to push for meaningful change (Pengfei et al., 2023).

Building a More Sustainable AI Future

So, how can we make AI more water-friendly? Here are a few ideas:

  1. Greener Data Centers: We can design servers and data centers that rely less on water-intensive cooling systems. For example, using air economizers or systems that can use non-potable water (Masanet et al., 2020).
  2. Smart Scheduling: By optimizing when and where AI tasks are processed, we can take advantage of times and locations with better water efficiency.
  3. Water Restoration Projects: While not a direct solution, supporting projects that restore local water sources can help offset AI's water usage (Pengfei et al., 2023).

Big tech companies are in a unique position to lead the charge on this issue. By adopting renewable energy and participating in water conservation programs, they can set an example for responsible AI development.

Wrapping Up

As we continue to push the boundaries of what AI can do, we need to be mindful of its impact on our planet's resources. The water footprint of AI deserves just as much attention as its carbon emissions. By being more transparent about water usage, investing in green technologies, and promoting responsible development practices, we can ensure that AI's advancements don't come at the cost of our precious water resources.

Remember, this is a complex issue with no easy solutions. But by starting these conversations and pushing for more sustainable practices, we can work towards a future where AI helps solve environmental problems rather than contributing to them.

References

This is such a crucial conversation; tech and sustainability must go hand in hand.

Like
Reply

To view or add a comment, sign in

More articles by Francisco Schubert

Insights from the community

Others also viewed

Explore topics