Creating Deeper, More Meaningful Conversations (Fast)
To Ponder: Creating Permission To Be Honest
A large part of my work is ‘advisory’ - i.e. having deep, useful discussions with change leaders to help them drive more valuable change. But here’s the thing - these discussions only work when there’s a sense of genuine and direct honesty between both myself and the client.
Now, I’m honest and direct for a living - and it’s something I’ve embraced into my day to day life. But I’ve noticed that, usually quite quickly (often in less than half hour of first meeting me), the people I chat to are willing to share their own fears, vulnerabilities and hopes.
In short - they and I create a collective permission to be honest and vulnerable with each other, which is to our mutual benefit.
So, as I’m prone to do, I sat back with a lovely wine late last week and reflected with my (even more lovely) wife on how this was so… What were the factors that created this collective permission for honest vulnerability? After all, establishing deeper connections is a useful skill for any change leader.
Here’s what I landed on.
The 3 Factors to create collective permission for honest vulnerability:
First, there must be established credibility. It must be clear that the relationship will be valuable to them. This creates a peer-level power dynamic. Experience, reputation, and ideas come into play here.
Second, there must be demonstration of understanding. You must be able to play-back their situation in your own terms, and have them agree that yes, you’re understanding correctly. Don’t be afraid to ask questions, and then play it back using “so, what I’m hearing is…”
Third, you must have an earnest desire to help. Not for your own ego, but for their benefit.
After those three factors are in place, you’ll find that your conversations will shift. You can provide more direct advice, stimulate more useful collaborations, and create more meaningful results.
Which of your conversations would benefit from more honest vulnerability?
How can you better establish credibility, demonstrate understanding and foster an earnest desire to help within your own change?
To Action: Bold or Guilty?
“No Guilt, No Fear, No Peer” is something that ‘Million Dollar Consultant’ Alan Weiss often repeats. It's a mantra of boldness.
No Guilt - don’t feel guilty for sharing your view, your advice or your opinion. You’re not an imposter - you’re a human being with experiences, perspectives and thoughts that others don’t have. It’s not only your role to represent and communicate your thoughts - it’s often your duty to do so to create a better result.
No Fear - speak up. It’s just a meeting. It’s just a coffee. It’s just a discussion with another person. You’ll survive.
No Peer - your uniqueness is your value.
The amalgamation of those three results in a call to action: Be Bold! I can assure you that any career-related risk in your mind is likely overblown.
But here’s the caveat.
There’s a difference between boldness and arrogance - and that’s in your ability to accept and adapt to a challenge in your own beliefs, views or opinions.
It’s an artform, and one that takes active experimentation and self-reflection.
This week, take the opportunity to tweak and improve.
If you err towards fear - then embrace a ‘no guilt, no fear, no peer’ mindset for just a day. Try it on and you may be pleasantly surprised. Calm that amygdala of yours down.
However, if you err on the other side of the spectrum. If you tend to control and dominate discussion - practice shutting up. Ask questions, be curious and explore a view that isn’t your own.
Recommended by LinkedIn
To Reflect: Your Weekly Anti-Platitude
A conversation without mutual credibility is a favour.
A conversation without understanding is frustrating.
And a conversation without an open-mind is arrogance.
From Fear To Freedom: Facing Change with Brendon Baker
I caught up with the ‘Do-Be’ team a few weeks ago to discuss “the Great Reshuffling” (it’s not a great resignation!). In the 2-part podcast, we discuss:
Brendon is representing Australia on the Change Management Review’s Panel Discussion on Simplifying Change Management
One of my mantras is embrace simplicity, not simpleness.
But here's the thing. The need for strong Change Leadership and change management isn't stopping anytime soon. Not only that, but it's just getting more complex.
This complexity is something that I am actively fighting against.
In fact, it's even embedded into one of the Valuable Change Co.'s missions:
Fight Unnecessary Complexity.
This is why I'm really excited be one of the featured experts on the Change Management Review's International Panel for Simplifying Change Management. (I'm the only Aussie!)
Link here: https://lnkd.in/gGkB8ueP
With me on the panel is a master of deciphering complexity Edwina Pike, and Erika Andersen - the bestselling author of 'Change From The Inside Out' and 'Be Bad First'. Collectively we'll be fielding questions from the editors Brian Gorman and Theresa Moulton - who are both experts in the field.
It's scheduled for a nice and early 5am ADST, (so a early morning for me in Canberra). For those that don't want to join me at 5am - it's being recorded!
This is going to be an awesome discussion - and not one to miss.
Bolster credibility. Be bold.
See you next week.
BB
There are two types of people that garner influence in any room. Those that relentlessly add value and those that connect others to useful information. If you liked this week’s content, why not do both? Add your twist, and share it on.