The Declaration of Interdependence: Looking Back from 2030, How a World in Crisis Transformed Effectively for a New Digital Age
I wrote a similar article for CoinDesk's #Internet2030 series, where I imagined what the world could look like in 2030 if we all got our act together. The article was featured earlier this week and can be read here.
The year is 2030. Looking back, the Covid-19 pandemic of 2020-2022 took more than 5 million lives and devastated the global economy. It also revealed with searing clarity a weakness not just in our political leaders, governments and society, but in our systems for everything from supply chains to data, data and public health.
The second era of the digital revolution had started to come of age with powerful new technologies like blockchain, AI, machine learning, robots, and the internet of things showing how the traditional systems, supply chains, health data, and many of our institutions were outmoded. These technologies also created transparency that further revealed deep problems in society. Technology also caused problems and exacerbated the pandemic, for example fragmenting public discourse that enabled as shucksters to challenge basic science and prevent an effective response. Unscrupulous and political leaders who responded ineffectively were exposed before their populations.
It was one of those dramatic turning points in global history.
The effects of all this were felt most strongly in the United States, when President Donald Trump denied science and through his policies, personal example and divisive actions disarmed the nation from responding effectively to the pandemic. We all remember how he lost the election in November 2020, and refused to leave office, mobilizing armed militias and rank-and-file military personnel against their leadership to crush the mass demonstrations wanting to defend democracy. Fortunately, tens of millions of young people mobilized, and a general strike forced him to resign and hand over power.
The upshot was that this crisis revealed all the weaknesses of our underlying social contract in society as we fully transition to the digital age and unleashed a new set of forces for profound change. The weaknesses were formidable:
Systemic inequality and Racial Injustice. The increased transparency enabled by the Internet spotlighted the fragilities of our public health systems, with a disproportionate percentage of COVID-19 deaths in black, brown, and indigenous communities. The same was true for our financial system: in America, for example, nearly half of black households were unbanked or underbanked, and black entrepreneurs were twice as likely to be rejected for credit. Without access to banking services, how could they survive this economic meltdown? And mass incarceration, a symptom of criminal injustice, only concentrated these risks. In the summer and fall of 2020 citizens around the world rose up to demand fair and equal treatment under the law for people of color. Trust in politicians and the legitimacy of our governments was at an all-time low.
Elusive prosperity. Thirty-five years ago, I had hoped the Internet would create new industries and jobs. For a while, it did. But today technology is wiping out industrial business models like big box retail and media distribution and transportation. The pandemic hobbled others such as airlines, hospitality, tourism, and even commercial real estate. Many small businesses closed for good. Underemployment and the threat of structural employment fueled unrest. Today, 90 percent of the jobs in trucking, for example, is automated. In the 1990s digitized networks enabled outsourcing, offshoring, and the globalization of labor. Within the second era of the digital age — one centered on machine learning, artificial intelligence, robotics, the Internet of Things and blockchain technologies— many core functions of knowledge work were eliminated. Yes, there was a new wave of entrepreneurism, but many regulations were designed for the industrial economy, and so they hampered digital innovation. For example securities regulation was designed to protect an old failing financial system. With national borders becoming porous, the old ways of protecting domestic industries and taxing foreign companies just didn’t don’t work.
Commandeering of our data. Decades ago, when I wrote the Digital Economy, I had hoped the Internet would support our rights to life, liberty, and the pursuit of happiness in the process. Instead, the digital economy created a system of what I called “digital feudalism,” wherein a tiny few appropriated the largesse of this new era of prosperity. Data, the oil of the twenty-first century, was not owned by those who create it. Rather, it was controlled by an increasingly centralized group of “digital landlords” who collect, aggregate, and profit from the data that collectively constitutes our digital identities. By exploiting our personal data, they achieved unprecedented wealth, undermining our privacy and revenue potential in the process.
Fragmented public discourse. I hoped the Internet would bring us together as societies and improve our democracies. Instead, various factions on the Internet have stoked fear through fake news, rousing xenophobes and scapegoating minority groups. Fewer people sought to understand those who disagree with them or have different life experiences from theirs. The story that exploded before us is one of unacceptable conditions and the old establishment that created them. Amid death and economic destruction, people everywhere were “mad as hell and not going to take it anymore.”
The destruction of our biosphere. The fragmentation of public discourse enabled the short-term beneficiaries of climate change to deny basic science and sow confusion in the population. The Climate Fires of the West Coast of the United States continued to spread and the consequences were unthinkable.
There were many more problems.
The perfect storm and resulting unprecedented social unrest was leading to an inevitable civil war. But fortunately a miracle of sorts occurred: driven by fear and also a deep hope for a brighter future people everywhere began to undertake a new process, to reimagine our social contract — the basic expectations between business, government, and civil society for a new digital age. They called THE DECLARATION OF INTERDEPENDENCE.
In hindsight, this was not some kind of academic process but rather the result of mass mobilizations and it had real teeth and consequences. For example, we began to rethink many basic assumptions about the division of labor in society and who does what? Old government leaders were swept away and a new generation began to rethink how public resources should be allocated, putting money behind some fresh new thinking. Corporate leaders began to understand that business can’t succeed in a world that is failing.
Historically the digital age demanded that this rethinking had to occur. The crisis only accelerated the process.
Going back centuries, when we evolved from an agrarian economy to an industrial one, we developed a new social contract for the times — public education, a social safety net, and laws about civil rights, pollution, workplace safety, and financial markets to name a few. Countless nongovernmental civil society organizations arose to help solve problems. It is time to update these agreements, create new institutions, and renew the expectations and responsibilities that citizens should have about society.
In countries around the world new peoples’ congresses assembled around some new principles:
“Inclusive models of global problem-solving. The next era of the digital economy could bring epoch prosperity, if we rely on multi-stakeholder approaches to effect change. By that, I mean groups of independent parties who organize around the big problems we need to solve — not just health, education, and justice but social safety and environmental stability — the right to clean air, safe water, sustainable food sources, and ecologically sound homelands in perpetuity. People from government, the private sector, and civil society could forge and agree on new structures, new action plans and budgets.
“Rethinking democracy for citizen engagement. Networks enable citizens to participate fully in their own governance. Let’s rethink how we achieve public safety, perhaps shifting from top-down surveillance and enforcement to grassroots prevention and intervention. We can now move to a new era of democracy based on a culture of public deliberation and active citizenship. Mandatory voting encourages active, engaged, and responsible citizens, but only if voters can cast their ballots easily, securely, and without intimidation. Technologies such as blockchain, for example, enable us to embed electoral promises into smart contracts and to secure other forms of direct democracy through the mobile platforms citizens use every day.
“A New commitment to justice. Black lives matter, just like all lives should matter. Racism, class oppression and subjugation of all peoples must be swept into the dust bin of history, along with those who perpetrate these vile relics of the past. Enough!
“New models of work and education. Our expectations of employment are shifting. People no longer anticipate doing the same job in the same company in the same field their whole career. To support transitions, we need a universal basic income that supports entrepreneurialism and investing in the potential of individuals. Workers must prepare for unprecedented lifelong learning, with the knowledge that technology will likely force them to reimagine their role in the workforce. We need to transform how we educate young people in all zip codes for this future.
“New models of identity. Let’s move away from the industrial-age system of stamps, seals, and signatures we depend on to this day. We need to protect the security of personhood and end the systems of economic exclusion and digital feudalism. Individuals should own and profit from the data they create from the moment of their birth.
“A deep commitment to sustainability. It’s also time for business executives to participate responsibly — for their own long-term survival and the health of the economy and the planet overall. Even — or especially — in a time of exploding information online, we need scientists, researchers, and journalists to seek the truth, examine options, and inform the ongoing public conversation. We need to price carbon into everything and reduce carbon emissions my 90 percent by the year 2050. To do this billions of people can be mobilized to fight climate change. The planet has been mobilized before during world wars, but we were on different sides. Today we need everyone active, not just governments and corporations but parents, commuters, vacationers, employees, kids at school, consumers – everyone – from every walk of life if we are to turn the tide on global warming.
These goals were not utopian. Rather it turns out that they could only be achieved bottom up through struggle, as vested interests fought at the top fought against change.
Victor Hugo said there is nothing so powerful as an idea who’s time has come. In our case there was nothing so powerful as an idea that had become a necessity.
The status quo was indefensible to anyone with a conscience. Enlighted business leaders became involved too, understanding that busines cannot succeed in a world that’s failing.
And those dark and painful days called forth a new generation of leaders who united in collaboration to bring everyone into the digital age.
I hope you enjoy this edition of the Digital Economy Weekly!
Don
News from the Blockchain Research Institute
Join us for Blockchain Revolution Global 2020 at the World's First Global Blockchain Week
Join us on October 26th-30th for the inaugural Global Blockchain Week, a virtual experience featuring the Blockchain Revolution Global conference. Blockchain Revolution Global is the premier virtual event featuring the world’s foremost minds in technology and business, from government leaders and world-renowned economists, to pioneering technologists and Fortune 500 executives. Register today.
Blockchain and Pandemics: Read the Freely-Accessible Report
Our report exploring the challenges, opportunities, and recommendations for blockchain technology during the COVID-19 crisis is free to access. Read our report here.
Blockchain Online Courses in Partnership with INSEAD and COURSERA
Discover how blockchain is transforming business, government, and society with our suite of online courses. Anyone can enrol in our Blockchain Revolution Specialization, which includes four courses taught by Alex Tapscott and I. Produced in partnership with INSEAD Business School, the Blockchain Revolution Specialization covers everything you need to know about the disruption, opportunities, and implications of blockchain across industries and business sectors. Register here!
Blockchain Revolution Book Series
Starting with our book Blockchain Revolution: How the Technology Behind Bitcoin Is Changing Money, Business, and the World back in 2016, Alex Tapscott and I have since authored a number of books on the topic of blockchain, and its disruptive impact on sectors like supply chains, and the financial services. These critically acclaimed books have been used by global leaders to help them survive and thrive in this era of economic and technological disruption. The books are available on Amazon below, and are best bought in bulk!
- Blockchain Revolution: How the Technology Behind Bitcoin Is Changing Money, Business, and the World
- Supply Chain Revolution: How Blockchain Technology Is Transforming the Global Flow of Assets
- Financial Services Revolution: How Blockchain Is Transforming Money, Markets, and Banking
News from the Digital Economy
- Avalanche, a fintech platform backed by Andreessen Horowitz, just launched their full mainnet on September 21st. Ava Labs plans to roll out an open-source platform for launching DeFi applications, with the goal of solving scalability issues on the Ethereum network.
- On October 22nd, the Brightline Initiative, a member of BRI, will be hosting a virtual conference called Strategy@Work, to discuss topics related to “Unlocking the Truth about Transformation." I am pleased to announce that I will be speaking at the event. Stay tuned!
- Accenture has become the latest sponsor for the Baseline Protocol, an Ethereum open source initiative formed by EY, Consensys and Microsoft. The protocol is designed to streamline enterprise adoption of permissionless blockchain networks like Ethereum.
- Standard Chartered Bank along with Ant Group and two additional fintech firms have joined forces to launch a blockchain-enabled global remittance service. This service aims to serve Bangladeshi and Malaysian customers.
- Mastercard confirmed the launch of a platform catering toward Central Bank Digital Currencies, providing a simulation environment to facilitate the testing of digital coins for central banks around the world.
- The Bahamas plans to launch a central bank issued digital ‘Sand Dollar’ sometime in October
- The State of Utah revealed a blockchain solution for medical record sharing
- The Facebook-backed Libra project, looking to develop a borderless digital currency, welcomed Blockchain Capital as new member
- The central bank of the Philippines appears to be embracing the promise of digital tokens
FINANCE ACCOUNTANT. /GENERAL ANTONIO PORTA Y DE SOLANS/COUNT PALATINO GENERALISSIMO RAIMUNDO IGNACIO PORTA Y DE SOLANS
4yGreetings. Some presidents or Political leaderships have adopted suffocating policies, which instead of alleviating the economic effects, go in a rather critical direction. Example, Costa Rica: Regrettable and worrying. Of course, the perception of the President is not that of an economist President committed to his people. It does not have a defined north. His management has not been the best, nor the most precise to face the economic and social deterioration of Costa Rica. He does not know how the economy is governed, he does not know anything about politics and business development, or about social problems. All the tax proposals stifle the economy, stagnate production, the market, create inequalities, increase unemployment, poverty, social discontent, and increase the country's indebtedness. In truth, there has been no political commitment to reduce state spending. Rather, it seems that they live off the sacrifice of many Costa Ricans. They do not set the example of moderation and rather propose multi-million dollar projects that suffocate and impoverish the country. The government's saying is to improve the quality of life. Whose is it????? Obviously it is not that of the people, but of the great hierarchs of the state.
Improving organizations! Paying it forward! Collaborative ◇ Synthesizer ◇ Simplifier
4yAwesome work Don Tapscott
A.I. and Emerging Technologies Educator, Entrepreneur, Author, Speaker and Advisor. M. Ed. Peace Ambassador. Founder of A.I. for All Inc. Let’s talk about Peacebuilding using AI and emerging technologies! 🤖✨
4yThank You Don! I’m with You!
Gen AI & Blockchain Technologist | Data Analyst
4yVery thorough article! It is sad our government's (US) policies and structures haven't evolved, leading to crisis and threats all around.