Parte 1: The Discrepancy Between Discourse and Practice in Safety Leadership

Andreza Araújo

On an autumn afternoon, the CEO of a large construction company took the stage to speak at the annual safety conference. With eloquent words, he spoke about the company's unwavering commitment to the safety of its employees. The audience applauded, inspired by the apparent dedication of the leader to the cause. However, on the company's construction sites, the reality was quite different.

This fictional scenario, unfortunately, echoes painful truths in today's corporate world. Leaders often deliver inspiring speeches about the importance of workplace safety, promising a proactive safety culture. However, a deeper analysis often reveals a troubling contrast between the words spoken and the actions taken.

In this article, we will explore the discrepancy between discourse and practice in safety leadership. Using real cases and expert insights, we will discuss the possible causes and consequences of this phenomenon, aiming to shed light on a problem that affects not only worker safety but also the integrity and sustainability of organizations.

Problem Contextualization

The discrepancy between discourse and practice in safety leadership is not a new problem, but it has become increasingly evident in various industries. Leaders from sectors such as construction, manufacturing, mining, and energy are often seen promoting the importance of safe practices and a robust safety culture in their public statements and internal communications.

However, when we look beyond the rhetoric, the reality on the factory floor often tells a different story. Post-incident investigations, employee reports, and independent audits have revealed that, in many cases, the promises made in speeches do not translate into effective actions to ensure worker safety.

This discrepancy not only puts lives at risk but also undermines employees' trust in leadership and compromises the reputation of companies. It is a systemic problem that requires careful analysis and urgent corrective actions.

Cause Analysis

To understand the origin of this discrepancy, it is necessary to examine the factors that contribute to leaders' failure to translate their words into concrete actions. Some of the main reasons include:

• Pressure for Results: In an increasingly competitive corporate environment, leaders face constant pressure to deliver immediate financial results. This relentless pursuit of profits can lead to the neglect of safety initiatives, which may be seen as additional costs or obstacles to productivity.
• Lack of Knowledge and Skills: Many leaders, despite their managerial skills, lack specific knowledge about occupational safety and risk management. Without a deep understanding of safety principles and practices, they may struggle to translate their statements into effective actions.
• Deficient Organizational Culture: An organizational culture that does not genuinely prioritize safety can contribute to the discrepancy between discourse and practice. If safety is viewed merely as a compliance issue and not as a fundamental value, leaders may be less likely to act in accordance with their words.
• Ineffective Communication: The lack of clear and consistent communication between leadership and operational levels can create a disconnect between established guidelines and actual workplace practices. If safety messages are not reinforced and supported through actions and accountability, the discrepancy can perpetuate.

Consequences of the Discrepancy

The consequences of the discrepancy between discourse and practice in safety leadership are significant and far-reaching. Some of the main implications include:

• Increased Risk of Accidents: When leaders' words do not translate into concrete actions, the risks of workplace accidents and injuries increase. Without genuine leadership commitment, safety measures may be neglected, exposing workers to unnecessary dangers.
• Impact on Employee Morale and Engagement: The discrepancy between what is said and what is done can undermine employees' trust in leadership. When they perceive that safety promises are not kept, workers may feel undervalued and demotivated, negatively affecting their engagement and productivity.
• Damage to Reputation and Legal Liabilities: Accidents and injuries resulting from leadership failures in safety can significantly impact a company's reputation. Additionally, organizations may face legal and financial liabilities, including lawsuits, fines, and increased insurance costs.
• Compromise of Business Sustainability: In the long term, the discrepancy between discourse and practice in safety leadership can compromise business sustainability. A poor safety culture can lead to high employee turnover, loss of contracts, and difficulties in attracting new talent and investments.

Conclusion

The discrepancy between discourse and practice in safety leadership is a critical issue that requires immediate attention. Leaders must recognize the importance of aligning their words with concrete and consistent actions in favor of worker safety. To address this challenge, organizations should adopt a comprehensive approach that includes developing safety leadership skills, promoting an authentic safety culture, and implementing effective accountability systems. Only when safety becomes a truly ingrained value at all organizational levels can the discrepancy between discourse and practice be overcome.

In the next article in the series, we will explore practical strategies and tools to empower leaders to transform their words into meaningful actions, creating a safer and healthier work environment for all.

If you are interested in my content, don't miss out on purchasing my books published on Amazon in English.

80 Ways to Expand Risk Perception: https://amzn.to/3VbWlAV

Safety Culture: https://bit.ly/3x8IDXm

Safety Culture Diagnosis: https://amzn.to/3XfnBkt