Distinctive Aspects of Delay Claims and Variation Claims #Article33

Distinctive Aspects of Delay Claims and Variation Claims #Article33

1.1 Delay Claims: A delay claim constitutes a formal request initiated by one of the contractual parties within an Engineering, Procurement, and Construction (EPC) or construction contract. This request aims to secure either an extension of the originally stipulated project completion timeline or equitable compensation. These claims arise as a response to unforeseen and uncontrollable events that disrupt the project schedule, events that the contracting party asserts are beyond their reasonable control.

1.2 Variation Claims: Variation claims encompass the formal submission of a request by a contracting party participating in an EPC or construction contract. The objective of this claim is to seek adequate compensation for the additional costs incurred or modifications necessitated due to alterations in project specifications, scope, or design. These alterations are introduced and authorized by the client, architect, or other entities empowered to make such decisions within the contractual framework.

2. Causal Attributes:

2.1 Delay Claims: The genesis of delay claims can be traced to external forces that exert their influence beyond the reasonable sphere of control of the contractor. These external forces often take the form of acts of nature, force majeure events, unforeseen conditions at the project site, or actions instigated by third parties. These forces collectively impede the regular progress of the project, leading to the emergence of the delay claim.

2.2 Variation Claims: Variation claims find their roots in authorized changes that are instituted into the original project requirements. These changes are typically introduced by authorized entities such as clients or architects, leading to the introduction of new elements, modifications in design, adjustments to specifications, or changes in the initially defined scope of work within the contract.

3. Documentation and Substantiation:

3.1 Delay Claims: The successful substantiation of a delay claim hinges on the meticulous maintenance of comprehensive documentation. This documentation must intricately detail the specific event or circumstance that triggered the delay, elucidate the precise manner in which the delay impacted the project timeline, and outline the proactive mitigation measures that were undertaken to counteract the reverberations of the delay.

3.2 Variation Claims: To substantiate a variation claim, it is imperative to meticulously document the nature of the introduced changes, the deviations from the original contractual terms, and a clear breakdown of the supplementary costs that were incurred due to these alterations.

4. Responsibilities and Entitlements:

4.1 Delay Claims: Contractors who encounter project delays that are genuinely beyond their control are well within their rights to seek entitlement to both an extension of the project completion timeline and financial compensation. These entitlements are pursued in accordance with the contractual stipulations that govern such situations.

4.2 Variation Claims: Contractors are not only obligated to execute variations as directed by authorized entities but are equally entitled to claim rightful compensation for the additional costs that arise as a direct consequence of implementing these authorized changes.

5. Resolving Disputes and Quantum Assessment:

5.1 Delay Claims: The resolution of delay claims predominantly unfolds through negotiation, mediation, or other alternative dispute resolution mechanisms stipulated within the contract. The core objective of these processes is to meticulously assess the merit of the claim, accurately quantify the required extension of time, and arrive at an equitable determination of the financial compensation attributable to the extended timeline.

5.2 Variation Claims: Variation claims are effectively resolved by engaging in a structured change order process, involving negotiations between the involved contracting parties. The primary aim of these negotiations is to arrive at a consensus regarding the quantum of compensation that is justified to offset the financial implications arising from the authorized alterations to project specifications, scope, or design.

6. Expert Involvement:

6.1 Delay Claims: Instances of delay claims often necessitate the expertise of scheduling consultants or Delay analysts. These experts play a pivotal role in assessing the precise impact of the delay on the project timeline and subsequently determining the requisite adjustments needed to account for this impact using the right methodology of delay analysis.

6.2 Variation Claims: The successful resolution of variation claims may entail collaborating with quantity surveyors, engineers, or relevant experts. These experts provide invaluable insights into quantifying the tangible financial ramifications that accompany the approved changes and the subsequent requisites to address these changes.

7. Legal Implications and Mitigation:

7.1 Delay Claims: The legal implications associated with delay claims encompass disputes that revolve around issues of liability, responsibility, and the legitimacy of the claim itself. The mitigation efforts in this context involve undertaking reasonable measures to alleviate the adverse effects of the delay and adhering meticulously to the contractual procedures that pertain to promptly notifying the opposing party about the delay.

7.2 Variation Claims: Legal implications related to variation claims entail negotiations concerning the precise quantum of compensation and strict adherence to the contractual processes governing the initiation and execution of changes. To mitigate potential conflicts, diligent and timely notification of the alterations and their corresponding financial implications is essential to facilitate a harmonious resolution.

Within the intricate landscape of Engineering, Procurement, and Construction (EPC) and construction contracts, the ability to distinguish between delay claims and variation claims is of paramount importance. A profound comprehension of their distinct attributes empowers contractual parties to effectively navigate challenges, manage expenses, and facilitate the seamless progression of projects. This nuanced understanding contributes to upholding the integrity of construction contracts and ultimately culminates in the realization of successful project outcomes.

 #constructiondisputes #constructionclaims #contractdisputes #internationalcontracts #arbitration #ADR #EPC #contractmanagement #projectmanagement #contractlifecycle

For Claims and Contracts management services contact ilam@pragmaticpc.com

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

𝑩𝒐𝒐𝒌𝒔 𝒃𝒚 𝑨𝒖𝒕𝒉𝒐𝒓:

𝗖𝗼𝗻𝘀𝘁𝗿𝘂𝗰𝘁𝗶𝗼𝗻 𝗖𝗼𝗻𝘁𝗿𝗮𝗰𝘁 𝗖𝗹𝗮𝗶𝗺𝘀:

https://lnkd.in/gPYTUZ6D

𝟭𝟬𝟬 𝗙𝗔𝗤𝘀 𝗶𝗻 𝗘𝗣𝗖 / 𝗖𝗼𝗻𝘀𝘁𝗿𝘂𝗰𝘁𝗶𝗼𝗻 𝗖𝗼𝗻𝘁𝗿𝗮𝗰𝘁𝘀:

Part#1: https://lnkd.in/dAtKF4XR

Part#2: https://amzn.to/3MZAlq9

𝗣𝗿𝗼𝗰𝘂𝗿𝗲𝗺𝗲𝗻𝘁 𝗖𝗼𝗻𝘁𝗿𝗮𝗰𝘁𝘀:

https://lnkd.in/g_353Qp

#constructionclaims #delayanalysis #SCL #Constructioncontracts #contractmanagement #claimsmanagement #Delayclaims #variationclaims

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

OMER Civil Engr (PE), MCIArb, FICCP

Contracts Specialist at Surbana Jurong Group Pakistan. Top experience as Chief of Contracts for Neelum Jhelum Hydro Power Project (969 MW). Currently working on Karot HPP (720MW). Ex. GM Contracts, CM Division, NESPAK.

1y

Nice work

Like
Reply
Eng. Marco Vicent (P.E-Tz)

Site Engineer @ Webuild | Large & Complex Project Design and Construction 🇸🇦

1y

Thanks for sharing

To view or add a comment, sign in

More articles by Ilamparithi BoologaSundaraVijayan

Insights from the community

Others also viewed

Explore topics