Downsizing Gracefully: If, When & How To Lean Out
Is it existential? Or is it just stressful?
Downsizing, pivoting, “going in a different direction” - these are not rash decisions to make when it comes to your business.
This storm of high-profile layoffs we are weathering, in tech and beyond, might seem impulsive, careless, random…and some might very well be.
For others it’s hard to say without inside intel, and even with transparency often the din of upset and resentment is louder than any strategy behind the scenes.
But a slew of factors - the economy as a whole, for one - mold an organization’s need to pivot: present or forecasted, acute or holistic, and existential or temporary.
Understanding them in your own business can save you a lot of grief.
The sequence of triaging when entertaining options for (seemingly) apocalyptic circumstances are:
If to, when to, and how to “lean out.”
I’ve had to do it before, I’m assessing it now, and surely I’ll face the music again.
Here’s a guide for “if, when and how to lean out” of operations in your business:
Being thorough and thoughtful are the underpinnings when it comes to this perceived “worst-case-scenario.” Making decisions and moving too fast is enticing, it feels on brand, it fits with the hustle culture -but it can directly cause the anguish you fear the most.
It’s not the end of the world, actually, and even if you must downsize…there’s a right way to do it.
1. Audit Your Business
Downsizing a business can be reactive, or proactive. Reactive is generally accompanied by a sense of panic, rash decisions, resentment, collateral damage and other fallout.
Proactive is more strategic (though collateral damage might be inevitable, planning can soften the blow).
Downsizing can help overcome:
Whatever the case may be, you must GET A GRIP. When things are uncertain, emotions are zinging. You need to get a grip on your nerves, but also…
A grip on what’s actually happening.
Get A Grip
In the heat of a perceived existential problem, the general sentiment is ANXIETY. It’s easy to jump the gun, start pulling levers, plugs and (no) punches. To reduce overhead by:
But none of these decisions will guarantee coming out stronger on the other side, especially if you are hasty. In these times, the risk of misunderstanding, misattributing, and throwing the baby out with the bathwater is lofty.
You must take a beat.
Resist the impulse to be rash, and truly investigate the factors at play - meaning, audit your business. Inform yourself before you decide to fix them, do damage control, or take the L.
All Hands On Deck
Downsizing CAN be an effective way to save money. It CAN be a clean slate to restructure and refocus based on changing needs. But it also can royally screw the whole operation and everyone involved.
The central mandate when in crisis mode is to scrutinize your business and find the root problems, or the slack. This is an all-hands mission.
All departments, all contractors and teams should be involved to discover the facts of the weak or broken systems, without blame or judgment. This is a team project with a very hard deadline.
First find the WHAT, and then swiftly move into the WHY. Threatening holistic issues can include:
Only then can you assess HOW to handle them, and WHERE to focus. Once information is gathered, ask yourself these questions:
Are you operating outside of your financial capability?
Would continuing at your current pace be the reason you close your doors for good?
OR…
Are there alternatives?
Is it existential, or is it stressful?
2. Trust Or Bust: Evaluating Red Flags
They say downsizing and layoffs aren’t personal. Companies point to the economy, the industry, demand, and viability-threatening financial instability…
The general sentiment is that it’s in “the company’s best interest,” not the fault of employees. Yes, the typical - or at least public reasons - for downsizing are in fact, not personal.
But as a business owner facing these hard decisions right now…I disagree. Sometimes, it is personal.
I do not mean to attack anyone, or be insensitive to those who find this all-too-relevant topic close to home. I’m just here to suggest that sometimes, a reason to “lean out” is none of those above…
It’s employees that break trust.
Hindsight is 20/20
This is one of those hindsight issues. It could have been prevented - but it’s too late now. Trust is really hard to regain. And those individuals are the last people you’d trust to fix your business in a do-or-die, existential scenario, because they were part and parcel of the problem to begin with.
Inherently, they aren’t the solution. But let’s step back to the could have been part. This is where the “accountability” actually traces back to YOU, and to the hiring process.
So when I said before that it can be personal - I meant the burden is technically also on YOU.
The 20/20 experience - at least for me - started with realizing I was approaching the screening process all wrong. I didn’t vet people adequately. What can I say, I like to move fast! I meet one stellar candidate I’m excited about, and wanna get groovin’.
But my naive process led to employees that:
I realize now that a higher level of scrutiny would have avoided the later existential problem. I’m not talking about experience, accolades, or even skills. I’m talking about markers of trust: if they’re coachable, they listen, and if they actually CARE.
Shifting Strategy: The Trust Matrix
My new, more strategic approach to screening for a role involves asking them granular questions about:
…And then, interviewing 5 more candidates - even if I like what I hear.
Selecting high-performers is not the endgame - even high-performing people need to be focused. They need to listen to you, as their leader, on how to leverage and hone their time without distractions.
Without trust in that, performance doesn’t matter.
There’s a performance-to-trust matrix I think of here:
This graphic shows this matrix visually:
The whole top right quadrant = bueno
The entirety of the two bottom quadrants = no bueno
And the top left quadrant varies.
Takeaway: it’s better to have medium performance and positive trust than high performance and negative trust.
The hiring process is ineffably consequential. It is where you build trust, and find trust. No matter if you are profitable, a company built on pseudo-trust, or naive trust, is a house of cards.
You need to be able to trust your team because inevitably, you’ll face crises, and whether they’re existential or just stressful, you won’t make it if you can’t.
3. Alternative Actions to Downsizing
You were about to jump the gun, make the rash decision to downsize. You panicked, understandably - it feels existential even when it isn’t sometimes.
But, you’ve thoroughly audited your business, from all angles. You have your arms around the state of your company and sussed out potential red flags.
Some of it might have been brutal, or at least sensitive - especially when it comes to assessing your employees, and your hiring process choices. But after all, it could turn out that it’s not your worst case scenario.
It could have been blown out of proportion, but you wouldn’t have known it without your deep inspection. After all, you might just need to make some other, non-layoff adjustments.
If this is your perception, it doesn’t mean things can stay the same. The situation still begs for action, and change, or you very well might eventually collapse anyways.
Alternative actions can be taken to save the good you have going on.
Is it just a matter of:
You’ll know the answer, but I implore you to ask yourself one overarching question and get real about it. Reflect harder on your workforce analysis:
Do you have the necessary trust in your employees to make these changes, fix these issues?
If the answer is no, then none of those alternative actions will succeed. I’ll say it again: trusting your employees is paramount to maintaining or salvaging a business.
For the sake of this topic, let’s assume your answer is “no.” How do you proceed, now that you know you have to downsize?
4. ID What’s Salvageable
If downsizing is necessary, decide what is worth saving. Some examples may be:
Consider how what you salvage could impact your clients - can it be done without impacting current levels of service? Current levels of value to stakeholders? To the employees you DO trust, and want to keep?
You have to audit and triage another round with this lens. This is a core part of having a plan.
5. Plug Pulling Execution
Knowing exactly what you’re trimming is part one. Executing and rollout is part two.
Internal rollout comes first. Delicate, sensitive communication is vital to a successful and peaceful lean-out. When it comes to layoffs, don’t drag it out - it will only hurt morale more and spike anxiety levels of everyone (including those you want to keep). People can see the signs - so act swiftly and respectfully.
Next comes external rollout. Depending on your public profile, you may or may not need to prepare a plan. If you run a company that’s high-profile, you certainly need it.
You also need to have a gameplan for what and who’s left.
You don’t want to wait until you crash and burn to start your recovery plan. You have to balance being strategic with timely - and that comes from your thorough understanding of the problems.
6. Pick Yourself Back Up - Back To Square One
After you execute your downsize - whatever capacity that looks like - you get to rebuild. You get to take what you preserved (a hopefully solid framework), and build upon it. But only once you have stabilized it.
Your rebuild starts with revamping your hiring process: the likely root of your problems. You need to reexamine, study even, how you will vet new hires, and what criteria you’ll hold them to. Your level of scrutiny needs refinement, but also the logistics.
I highly advise companies at this stage to seek consulting from and Industrial Organizational Psychologist - the scientists behind HR.
They’ll help you thoroughly reconstruct your entire hiring funnel:
Employee Retention
This is a good start, but measuring an effective hire doesn’t stop there. Maintaining them is equally important.
Follow I/O principles for sustaining motivation, measuring results, and providing constructive feedback - and not just quarterly. Have the infrastructure in place for consistency in all of these realms. Open the space for trust by providing support on an open-door basis.
Overall, there’s a lot of logistics, thought and energy here. But the bottom line of it all is that your new processes reflect what you’ve learned, from hiring to promoting.
Round Up
Downsizing isn’t a cozy process. Even if it isn’t for existential reasons, it’s stressful, it’s sensitive, and how you go about will be consequential to the future of your company.
Knowing what’s actually going on, knowing what the critical camel-back-breaking straws are, how to approach salvaging, how to pull the plug and how to pick yourself up by your bootstraps and move forward is the only way to approach it - not being rash. Not making assumptions. Not seeing through rose colored glasses or being naive.
If you are thoughtful and considerate of these circumstances, you’ll come out of it for the better. Just know, it’s not the end of the world!
#hiring #downsizing