The drama: from simple to simplistic

The drama: from simple to simplistic

Today, I wish to discuss a topic that plays a dramatic role in my life as a minimal industrial designer. The unceasing quest for minimalism and the constant need to synthesize my designs further sometimes lead to tedium or a sense of déjà vu.

Yes, because when it comes to your coffee table, opting for the finest option, such as a box crafted from phenolic ash plywood, might trigger the thought, "Perhaps a designer isn't needed for such a straightforward task." Yet, this notion is far from accurate. The mere consideration that provokes such a conclusion is sufficient to justify payment for the work.

The challenge then lies in creating something too easy to replicate. In doing so, you might discover your creation everywhere, possibly because someone else already conceived the idea. Furthermore, unethical companies might flood the market with replicas. Complicating matters, intellectual property safeguards might not apply due to the perceived simplicity of the design.

Is there a solution? Yes.

Let me clarify that this isn't a tutorial on becoming a proficient designer. Instead, it's a contemplation of potential solutions from my perspective. Imagine us sitting together on a Friday evening at a pub, engaged in a design conversation. Here's what I'd share, though my viewpoint might evolve after the second beer. I firmly believe that open discussions and considering diverse viewpoints are the way forward. If you have insights to complement or counter my reasoning, feel free to share them in the comments or through private messages.

Why do I emphasize this? Because I consider design an art, not a rigid science. There are no set rules.

So, let's embark on this journey.

Growing up as a designer under the influence of figures like Mari, Morrison, and Castiglioni, I naturally derive immense satisfaction from observing well-executed minimalistic designs. No extravagant shapes, reasonable pricing, and natural materials - these are my guiding principles.

No alt text provided for this image
The Crate - Jasper Morrison


Excellent.

These principles undoubtedly hold their ground and are relevant to various objects, especially those that design hasn't fully explored or those that are entirely novel. However, can we strictly adhere to these principles for established objects like furniture, lamps, automobiles, and tech products? The answer isn't straightforward. It often depends on the specific case, but generally, I lean towards diversifying our approach.

During my student days, some peers suggested I should transition to design engineering due to my hyper-rational approach to design. I wouldn't incorporate decorative elements or unnecessary curves unless they served a functional purpose, cost reduction, or another rational motive. This mindset echoes an engineering perspective. My inclination stemmed from a simple fact: no one had explained to me the underlying reasons driving the creation of new shapes in design.

Enrolling in a design school inherently implies engaging in novel, innovative forms from the outset. It's akin to attending culinary school with the tacit understanding that the dishes we create should not only taste good but also be nutritionally sound. However, the realm of design isn't as straightforward; we aren't culturally preconditioned to grasp the significance of shaping our surroundings for both function and emotion.

Historically, decoration or the use of sinuous forms often served to mask manufacturing imperfections. Consider the bathroom sink, for instance. Back in the '90s, it was common for sinks to be large, rounded, and bold. This design approach emerged because the ceramic basin tended to warp during the firing process, similar to a deflated sponge cake. To counter this, expansive rounded shapes were employed to minimize deformation and reduce production waste.

The pivotal moment arrived with the Acquagrande collection by designers Roberto Palomba and Giulio Cappellini for Ceramica Flaminia in 1997. They ventured into straight lines, compelling the company to innovate and engineer a new shape. This wasn't just a box; it carried meaning. It symbolized technological progress and uncharted avenues in design. While this shape is now commonplace due to its success, it was a turning point then.

No alt text provided for this image
Acquagrande - Palomba & Cappellini


Does it still warrant replication today? No. It's been done, established, and doesn't necessitate imitation devoid of added value.

Now, the crux of the issue is that we're taught to perceive this as a starting point, whereas reality dictates that mastering such simplicity requires exceptional skill.

Picasso, for instance, ventured into Cubism (technically "easier") after honing classical painting skills to a point where he needed to explore new avenues to express himself fully. The reverse approach, initiating with Cubism and then attempting to paint conventionally, is inherently flawed.

No alt text provided for this image
Early work by Pablo Picasso


Understanding why historical designs were heavily ornamented can shed light on the evolution toward minimalism. This comprehension leads to an informed choice between the two approaches (not necessarily mutually exclusive).

Design is not just a business; it's steeped in culture. Hence, it's imperative to respect and apply it judiciously to prevent mediocrity.

Thomas Heatherwick, an eminent designer-turned-architect, presents a captivating video titled The Case for Radically Human Buildings.


[This is a pertinent resource, though I apologize for frequently relying on architectural examples; unfortunately, designers rarely delve into such discussions online.]

Embracing minimalism in a superficial manner stands as our contemporary crisis, as Heatherwick points out, lacking a pivotal element: emotion, the ability of structures to resonate with us. Applying minimalism simplistically yields designs devoid of meaning in our era. Everything appears homogeneous, and the design community may commend a skillfully rendered cylindrical vase, but consumer interest remains low.

Minimalism, when wielded appropriately, possesses profound significance and can be a potent tool. Otherwise, it succumbs to tedium.

Could the Acquagrande have sported faceted facets instead of a plain façade? Not likely. It represented progress and exploration, necessitating simplicity to convey its message powerfully. Multiple surfaces would have diluted its impact.

Thus, simple forms must possess meaning; otherwise, they are simply simplistic. This isn't just about manufacturing efficiency; it can also encompass emotions without a tangible production rationale. A case in point is Nendo's Deepsea for Glass Italia. Comprising multiple layers of glass, it imparts the illusion of darkening, though it's merely an optical effect.

No alt text provided for this image
Deepsea - Nendo


No curves, just plain rectangular surfaces. Why? The focus is on color, not form. This exemplifies meaningful minimalism with uncomplicated shapes. There's a tangible concept behind it, and expressing this concept in such a straightforward manner is a testament to sensitivity and the capacity to convey ideas without distraction.

I view minimalism as a destination, attainable once one comprehends function, decoration, and emotion. This is why I share my musings here - to refine my thoughts and chart a creative trajectory.

This is my perspective, and I'm eager to hear yours. Please, share your thoughts!

In my next piece, I'll delve into pioneering design firms that dare to take risks.

Theo Williams

Theo Williams is a multidisciplinary designer and creative director, known for his innovative approach and leadership across various sectors of the design-led industry.

1y

👏👏👏👏bravo. I really enjoy reading your thoughts. Bravo bravo.

To view or add a comment, sign in

More articles by Mario Alessiani

  • Why I left the big city

    Why I left the big city

    Living in a small city has drastically boosted my creativity. It was a choice I made when I was younger, and I don’t…

    4 Comments
  • Don’t Confuse Universal With Boring

    Don’t Confuse Universal With Boring

    The phrase "Less is more" has become somewhat of a cliché over the years—not because the concept itself is flawed, but…

    5 Comments
  • Reimagining Icons: What Industrial Design Can Learn from Music Covers

    Reimagining Icons: What Industrial Design Can Learn from Music Covers

    Have you ever thought about the similarities between good music and good design? There was a time when I was quite…

    6 Comments
  • Communicate, Communicate, Communicate

    Communicate, Communicate, Communicate

    The typical phrase "It’s not what you do, it’s how you do it" has a hidden meaning: it doesn’t matter how good you are;…

  • If you want to upgrade, make it transparent.

    If you want to upgrade, make it transparent.

    Transparency as a finish is kind of trendy these days, but I think that it is like that for a number of reasons…

    2 Comments
  • Objectivity in beauty

    Objectivity in beauty

    As a designer, the recurring question in my mind is: what is beautiful? Are there any factors that can serve as proof…

    3 Comments
  • Design for the Five Senses

    Design for the Five Senses

    It's not exactly a title; it's more of advice. Let's explore how this can influence the way our ideas are perceived and…

    5 Comments
  • Why I Don’t Accept Briefs Anymore

    Why I Don’t Accept Briefs Anymore

    It’s a clear provocation; the brief is a fundamental aspect of the relationship between designers and companies…

    14 Comments
  • Understanding the SuperNormal

    Understanding the SuperNormal

    Is Simplicity Truly Minimal? If you're reading this, you're probably entrenched in the world of design. If not, that's…

  • Breaking the Habits

    Breaking the Habits

    Never take an action for granted as a design tool Have you ever noticed that when someone evaluates your design, they…

    4 Comments

Insights from the community

Others also viewed

Explore topics