Electroslag Welding vs. Submerged Arc Welding (ESW vs. SAW)

While both Electroslag Welding (ESW) and Submerged Arc Welding (SAW) techniques serve similar purposes, they have distinct differences that make them suitable for specific applications. In this article, we delve into the intricacies of both techniques to understand their strengths and weaknesses.

Electroslag Welding (ESW):

Electroslag Welding is a welding process that involves the production of an electric arc between the filler metal and the base metal, creating the molten slag required for welding. The primary characteristic of ESW is its ability to weld thick base metals in a vertical position, making it ideal for joining heavy plates and sections, such as in shipbuilding, tank erection, and bridge construction.

The process begins with a consumable electrode being fed into the joint, initiating the electric arc, used only to start the process. As the arc heats up, the flux in the joint [which has very low resistivity] becomes molten, creating a pool of slag. This pool acts as a conductor, by the Joule Effect, and once the process is stabilized the arc is extinguished [arc-less process]. The filler metal gets fused and deposited through the melting pool, leading to a solid weld joint.

Advantages of Electroslag Welding:

• Efficiency: ESW excels at creating welds in single pass on vertical-up position, making it highly efficient for thick materials.
• High Deposition Rate: The process allows for a high deposition rate, reducing welding time and increasing productivity.
• Minimal Operator Skill Required: Due to its automatic nature, ESW requires less operator skill compared to some other welding methods.

Disadvantages of Electroslag Welding:

• Limitation in Weld Positions: ESW is primarily designed for vertical-up welding, which can be a limitation for certain projects.
• Complex Setup: The setup and preparation for Electroslag Welding can be more complicated compared to some other welding methods.

Submerged Arc Welding (SAW):

Submerged Arc Welding is a widely used welding process wherein an arc is generated between a continuously fed electrode and the workpiece. However, unlike Electroslag Welding, SAW operates with an electric arc beneath a layer of granular flux, which blankets the welding area. The flux serves multiple purposes, including shielding the arc, promoting metal transfer, and creating a protective slag layer over the weld bead.

SAW is commonly employed in the fabrication of pipes, pressure vessels, structural steel, and other applications where long, continuous high responsibility welds are required.

Advantages of Submerged Arc Welding:

• High Weld Quality: SAW consistently delivers high-quality welds due to the continuous nature of the process and the protection provided by the flux.
• Versatility: SAW can be used for various joint configurations and base metals grades.
• High Deposition Efficiency: This method has a high deposition rate, resulting in less welding time and high productivity.

Disadvantages of Submerged Arc Welding:

• Limited Thickness Capability: SAW may not be as suitable for extremely thick materials compared to Electroslag Welding.

• Welding position: Due to its high deposition rate, the process is limited to horizontal, fillet and flat positions, even though more flexible than (ESW).

In summary, both Electroslag Welding (ESW) and Submerged Arc Welding (SAW) are valuable tools. Electroslag Welding is ideal for thick materials and vertical-up welding, while Submerged Arc Welding excels in producing high-quality continuous welds with greater responsibility and better mechanical properties. The choice between the two methods depends on project requirements, material thickness, and welding position.

Want more welding tips like these?

Join us at ESAB University