Is Envy the Most Contagious Disease of Our Time?
(Image created by the author with Microsoft Designer)

Is Envy the Most Contagious Disease of Our Time?

In an era of viral TikToks and "reality" media, our perception of wealth and inequality has become increasingly warped.

But here's a provocative question:

Is our perception of inequality growing faster than inequality itself? And has social media, perhaps even more than income inequality, occasioned a pandemic of envy?

Let's explore this idea...

Historically, the poor were only vaguely aware of the ultra-wealthy, their experience largely limited to those in their immediate vicinity. A medieval peasant might only see wealth in the local lord's castle, if at all. A 19th-century factory worker might glimpse the owner's mansion from afar.

Even in the mid-20th century, the lifestyles of the rich seemed comically alien to average Americans, as evidenced by the popularity of shows like "The Beverly Hillbillies" and "Green Acres," which portrayed wealthy characters as fish out of water among "regular" folk.

Later, Robin Leach's "Lifestyles of the Rich and Famous" offered tantalizing glimpses into celebrity opulence, but these remained distant, almost fantastical images for most viewers.

This disconnect persisted into the early 2000s with shows like "The Simple Life," featuring Paris Hilton and Nicole Richie – wealthy socialites comically struggling with everyday tasks and jobs. These portrayals, while entertaining, still maintained a clear separation between the wealthy elite and the average viewer. They were less about envy and alienation, more about how out of touch the wealthy were with "real life."

Today, however, we're all inundated with global displays of opulence. A teenager in small town USA can watch YouTube videos of Dubai's gold-plated cars or scroll through Instagram photos of celebrities' private island vacations. A minimum-wage worker can use TikTok to tour multimillion-dollar Beverly Hills mansions or travel along on a super-yacht.

This dramatic increase in our exposure to wealth from around the world brings new challenges. We're learning how to distinguish between different levels of economic challenges and outsized aspiration. After all, there's a world of difference between struggling to survive...and driving a perfectly serviceable Honda while coveting a Maybach.

Make no mistake: Extreme poverty remains a dire situation requiring urgent action. That said, encouragingly, global extreme poverty actually has decreased significantly in recent decades.

This positive global trend coexists with a troubling reality in many developed nations: younger generations are less likely to surpass their parents economically. This generational decline in prospects underlies much of the current discourse on inequality.

Perhaps what we're witnessing could be described as a "pandemic of envy." Many people in developed countries whose basic needs are more than being met are nonetheless unhappy, constantly comparing themselves to those who have "more" – a phenomenon amplified by social media's aforementioned relentless, curated displays of luxury.

The actual "numbers" tell an intriguing story that highlights the disconnect between economic reality and our perception of it. The Gini coefficient, a measure of income inequality where 0 represents perfect equality and 1 represents maximum inequality, has slightly decreased globally in recent years.

Nonetheless, in the U.S., the income share of the top 1% has doubled since 1980. As they say, "the rich are getting richer."

Meanwhile, social media usage has exploded to more than 4.5 billion users worldwide. This suggests that while global inequality may be improving slightly, our exposure to extreme wealth through social media is growing exponentially, potentially amplifying our perception of economic disparities.

This disconnect — between gradual economic shifts and rapidly changing media landscapes — is reshaping our understanding of our societal position. The constant exposure to aspirational content is distorting our perception of economic reality more than reflecting it.

Nonetheless, a recent personal experience gave me hope. Sitting at my coffee shop, watching onlookers laugh at an ostentatious Tesla Cybertruck, rather than admire it, suggested a growing skepticism towards flashy displays of wealth. Perhaps we need more of this – more laughing at the excesses of the uber-rich rather than celebrating or envying them.

Navigating these issues isn't easy, but keeping perspective is key. We can't ignore real poverty, nor can we dismiss the psychological toll of feeling left behind in a world of apparent abundance.

At the same time, we need to challenge our obsession with material success and break free from the cycle of constant comparison to the ultra-wealthy. Maybe it's time we shifted our focus – away from chasing opulence and towards pursuing genuine fulfillment and meaning.

After all, isn't a life rich in purpose more valuable than a garage full of luxury cars?

Lindsay S.

MHS Candidate at Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health | Public Health Advocate | Exploring Social Media, Mental Health & Youth Well-Being

2mo

This article is extremely relevant! From a public mental health standpoint, elements of digital culture are increasingly weaving into real life. Many individuals are drawn to the notoriety and seemingly easy ways of generating income through building an online presence, with envy becoming a driving force behind efforts to emulate influencers and celebrities. While the long-term cost of this shift remains to be seen, I predict a growing tendency for people to distance themselves from the 'average class.' If this trend evolves, it becomes crucial to reemphasize the importance of empathy and social cohesion.

Benjamin Garbe

CMO | Creative Director | Film Producer | Semi-Retired Rapper

2mo

Envy, not greed? Feels like greed has been endemic since Gordon Gekko made it “good” in the '80s. We're just living through the fallout. Turns out, nothing trickled down, and greed wasn’t good. You nailed it though. Social media fuels the fire from both ends. Braggers flex for likes/$, doom scrollers drown in envy of lives they'll never have...it’s a vicious cycle. And we blew past French Revolution wealth-gap levels a few exits ago. The real fix? A thriving middle class. When people can build families, own homes, and live meaningful lives in their prime, envy loses some of its grip. (I hope...🫠) Until then, marketers should remember everyone else, too. One of my favorite research projects came post-2016 election for a major TV network. Viewership had cratered among lower-income audiences, who couldn’t connect with TV families— even the supposedly “struggling” ones—living in oversized homes with lifestyles out of reach of many viewers around the country. When the research confirmed it, the network pivoted, rolling out shows for lower-income viewers. The first show greenlit was a massive hit with that lower net worth demo and it's still going strong nearly a decade later.

Like
Reply
Mathew Torosian

Materials expert with over 35 years of experience in supporting customers with materials that meet their materials requirements and securing a supply chain to deliver those solutions at scale.

2mo

Nice article Scott! Note that just because someone's life on social media or driving their flashy, expensive car is not representative of their reality. It's just the glossy surface we see. There could be many problems underlying that glossy exterior. Likewise, many in the lower quartile of the socioeconomic scale are very happy and fulfilled. We must stop assuming anything about anybody. The person on social media is typically not as happy as they appear and just because someone doesn't have financial wealth, does not mean they are not happy. Count your blessings not those not yet fulfilled and the glass will always be more that half full!

Interesting as always, Scott, and interesting enough for a Saturday I suppose. Just have to point out a couple of points because I spent a long time studying. This is part of my research at Accenture. It ultimately led to a book called Mass Affluence. While global Gini curve has improved somewhat for the better, and the super rich are taking more, really interesting economics has been the growing class of mildly rich. At the time of the book in 2001 we put them in the range of $100-$300,000 annual income. This segment of earners has grown enormously since 1973. The result has been that in 2001 the top 1/3 of earners took home 2/3 of total. So marketing to and selling to Mass Affluents became a critical component of all selling. Part of this democratization of wealth has come from knowledge work. What most people don’t realize is the change in relative incomes of young and old. In 1965, an 18 to 25 year old earned 80% of what a 65-year-old earned. Today a 55 to 65 year old on on average over 3.2 times what an average 18 to 25-year-old earns. Kids are still at home because home is on average much nicer than anything they can afford. All this is just to say envy has changed in part because affluence has become more pervasive.

Bullseye. This phenomenon is an existential threat to a civilized society. At some point, the have-nots get sick of it and show up at the haves with pitchforks. But that might not even be the worst of it. Envy is reordering the labor market. The PE industry is the best example of this. College students, particularly men, disproportionately want to pusue a career in private equity (with investment banking as a close second). There is no other explanation for this beyond money. These are not intrinsically interesting jobs, particularly junior roles. It is an unrelenting grind with the only payoff being money. Our best and brightest are turning away from academics, medicine, politics and a host of other industries. We need for this to change. As a society we need to place a higher value on things beyond maximizing our earnings.

To view or add a comment, sign in

Insights from the community

Others also viewed

Explore topics