Farewell global health

Farewell global health

About a year ago, I started writing an article on the decline of global health. I have now posted it (4000+ words). We could all see the trend of nation-states withdrawing into more populist, authoritarian, and revanchist postures. Divided nations are ill-suited to a global agenda of working together for a common good. A flock of authoritarian governments congratulating each other today is no basis for future global cooperation. Nonetheless, if I wanted to make the case, I needed to be more explicit about the link between a fracturing the global order and global health.

As the 2024 U.S. election approached, this article—a dozen drafts in—became increasingly difficult to write. It was missing a pivotal data point. Now that data point has been colored-in and the post-inflection trajectory is clear.

We should be worried about the future of global health.

Global health is fundamentally about shared, universal values—the human rights-based framework. These values underpin the very concept of the ‘global’ of global health, distinguishing it from the technical, disease-control focus of the old “international health.” Technical solutions, while vital, are merely tools to realise the foundational rights that ensure equity and dignity in health. Without this the normative values-based approach of equity and rights, decisions about who receives care risk being driven by wealth, political alignment, or cultural affinity. It will destroy global health.

The AIDS crisis marked a pivotal shift, marking the beginning of global health. Through advocacy and international cooperation it reframed health as a universal right. Yet this hard-won progress has been in decline for the past 20 years and faces existential threats. A second Trump administration promises deeper erosion of multilateralism, international aid, and rights-based approaches. Health will become a geopolitical bargaining chip in a transactional world of nationalist posturing—its moral foundation stripped away. As authoritarianism rises and equity erodes, global health is on life support: reaffirm universal rights or surrender to a transactional, fragmented future.

Dr Susan Ceri R Diamond

Expert Social Policy Researcher and Analyst

1mo

Brilliant article Daniel. Brutal and insightful. When will we learn that rich or poor, our neighbour/hood's human rights, health and wellbeing, and our own, are interdependent.

Thanks for sharing

Like
Reply

To view or add a comment, sign in

More articles by Daniel Reidpath

  • The Real Work of Health System Reform

    The Real Work of Health System Reform

    At a time when health systems globally face unprecedented pressures, a recent paper led by Professor Sophie Witter at…

    2 Comments
  • Behind Closed Doors: Shedding Light on Gender-Based Violence in China

    Behind Closed Doors: Shedding Light on Gender-Based Violence in China

    It is estimated that nearly one in three women and girls will experience physical and/or sexual violence in their…

    2 Comments
  • Global Health's Missing Voice in Conflict

    Global Health's Missing Voice in Conflict

    As violence erupts across the world - from Ukraine to Gaza, Sudan to Myanmar - the Global/Public Health community has…

    1 Comment
  • Education is critical

    Education is critical

    Ms Fatou Baldeh, MBE On this International Women's Day, I am thrilled to share that Fatou Baldeh MBE , a 2012 graduate…

    2 Comments
  • Part-time lecturer

    Part-time lecturer

    In the Institute of Global Health & Development (IGHD) at Queen Margaret University we have a 0.5FTE, short-term…

    1 Comment
  • Policy Brief Launch

    Policy Brief Launch

    Join the launch of the policy brief: “Strengthening faith-sensitive mental health and psychosocial support for children…

  • You can't stop COVID-19 in a slum

    You can't stop COVID-19 in a slum

    In April last year, about one month after the global pandemic was announced by the World Health Organization, we…

    12 Comments
  • Research Leadership (Conflicts of Interest Part I)

    Research Leadership (Conflicts of Interest Part I)

    I have found myself reflecting on questions of research leadership more and more and have planned a series of pieces…

    3 Comments
  • The Imperative to Preserve Research Capacity

    The Imperative to Preserve Research Capacity

    An Open Letter to Donors, Funders and Research Councils The world is facing an unprecedented humanitarian crisis that…

    4 Comments

Insights from the community

Others also viewed

Explore topics