Featured Article: How methodology affects US technology index performance

Featured Article: How methodology affects US technology index performance

How can you identify the optimal US technology sector investment? Identifying the best investment in the US technology sector requires a multifaceted approach. Increasingly, investors are recognising the crucial role of index methodology in this process.

  • Impact of Index Methodology: The way an index is constructed can significantly influence its performance, especially in concentrated sectors like U.S. tech.
  • Performance Comparison: Over the past year, the Russell 1000 Technology RIC 22.5/45 Capped Index outperformed the Technology Select Sector Index by 7%.

It is a common misperception that two indexes covering the same market segment must be, essentially, interchangeable. But a better constructed US technology index can enable you to meet your investment objectives with greater precision. How an index is constructed and maintained may sound theoretical—but the potential impact on performance is real.

The concentration conundrum 

The technology industry continues to be top of mind as market participants monitor the ups, downs, and changing prospects of big-name firms. As several powerhouse companies have grown into mega-cap territory, their dominance in popular indexes has come under scrutiny.

Investors are increasingly tuned in to the need to manage the concentration risk presented by traditional cap-weighted indexes. Some are seeking strategic diversification while others must also consider limits designed to ensure diversification and protect fund investors. For example, Regulated Investment Company (RIC) capping rules for US-registered funds require that the aggregate share of companies with weights greater than 5% be limited to 50% (known as the 5/50 limit), and that no individual company have a weight greater than 25% of the fund.

Capping leads to differences in holdings and performance

We see a notable difference in the largest holdings of RIYWC versus S&P’s Technology Select Sector Index, which uses a different capping methodology. The Technology Select Sector Index, Apple was weighted at less than 5% as of August 30, 2024. In RIYWC, Apple’s weight was more than 16%. Other differences in holdings—such as Alphabet and Meta Platforms—are due to underlying industry classifications.

Read the full article

Related content: How and when do we cap indexes?


Featured Research

The forgotten stimulus – uncovering the revival of Europe’s peripheral markets

The tables have turned. Known as the “locomotive of Europe” and the “growth engine of Europe”, the German economy has recently been described again as the “sick man of Europe”. ̶By contrast, Spain, once an economy beset by high debt, inflation and unemployment, is now set to power ahead in 2024-2025, with a far higher growth expectation of 1.9% in 2024, and 2.1% in 2025, than Germany’s GDP growth estimates of 0.2% in 2024 and 1.3% in 2025, and the Euro area’s 0.8% and 1.2%.

Helped by robust consumption, tourism and a sizeable share of the EU’s Recovery and Resilience Facility (RRF) funding, under the aegis of the Next Generation EU (NGEU), Spain’s economic reversal in fortunes is becoming increasingly apparent in financial markets, but it is not alone.

Our research provides valuable and unique insights into the structural differences and investment opportunities within European markets. It underscores the differentiated opportunities and risks within the Eurozone, shaped by the interplay of fiscal stimulus, market composition, and economic growth dynamics. An overview of what it means:

•            Focus on peripheral markets with tailwinds from RRF Funding: Spain and Italy

•            Germany presents challenges amid economic weakness

•            Risks from public finance strains: Italy’s public finances remain under pressure

•            Divergent Growth Dynamics in 2024–25: Spain is expected to lead Eurozone growth in the coming years

•            Sector-specific strategies may outperform

•            Ex-Financials in Spain have better valuations compared to Italy

Read the full research


Featured Video

New world, new playbook?

In this episode of Macro Microscope, Indrani De, CFA, PRM, Head of Global Investment Research at FTSE Russell explores the stark shift in behaviours of financial markets across countries. She dives deep into the southern peripheral economies of the Eurozone, analysing fixed income and equities, and how their performance has changed relative to the traditionally strong northern European countries.  She then focuses on the APAC region, examining the relationship between Chinese and Japanese yields. With Japan seemingly overcoming its decade-long battle against deflation, she raises a critical question: Is China now facing a similar challenge?

Next, John Dioufas, Director, Datastream and Macroeconomics at LSEG, analyses the implications of potential deflation in China, particularly how it influences the pricing of future interest rates. He then flips the narrative to the United States, where the yield curve suggests a different story. The market anticipates higher future interest rates, driven by the belief that inflation will be more persistent in the US than many expect. What do these different scenarios mean?

Watch the video


Index Idea

Using (US) ETFs for tax loss harvesting

Discover the benefits of using ETFs for tax loss harvesting with insights from Daniel Prince, US Head of iShares Product Consulting. This strategy involves selling stocks or funds at a loss to offset gains and up to $3,000 in income, while staying invested through ETFs, adhering to IRS wash sale rules.

Tax loss harvesting isn't about exiting the market but finding opportunities. Staying invested allows participation in potential market gains, as seen in 2023 when US equities surged by 14% in the last two months. Daniel explains that you can avoid missing out by sticking to your plan and considering ETFs like IWF (iShares Russell 1000 Growth ETF) for exposure to growth-oriented stocks or funds, or IWD (iShares Russell 1000 Value ETF) for value stocks or funds.

Watch the video

Please note ***iShares ETFs are not sponsored, endorsed, issued, sold or promoted by FTSE Russell or LSEG. Nor do FTSE Russell or LSEG make any representation regarding the advisability of investing in any of the products. iShares is not affiliated to FTSE Russell or LSEG.***


FTSE Russell Insights

Subscribe to FTSE Russell Research to stay updated with our latest research insights.

FTSE Russell

With over $18 trillion in reported fund assets under management benchmarked to our indices, FTSE Russell is a leading global index provider across asset classes and investment styles.

To view or add a comment, sign in

More articles by FTSE Russell, An LSEG Business

Explore topics