Food for Agile Thought #387: Culture & Methods Trends 2023, The Introverted Product Manager, Spotify’s Way of Working, Users Lie to Us
Also: Devs & Brainstorming, Ugly NPS in B2B, ChatGPT Designs Workshops, ROI for Innovation

Food for Agile Thought #387: Culture & Methods Trends 2023, The Introverted Product Manager, Spotify’s Way of Working, Users Lie to Us

TL; DR: Culture & Methods Trends 2023 — Food for Agile Thought #387

Welcome to the 387th edition of the Food for Agile Thought newsletter, shared with 45,893 peers. This week, Shane Hastie introduces the Culture & Methods Trends 2023 report, from culture handbooks to LLM-supported development to scaling frameworks entering the Late Majority. Moreover, we learn from an interview with Brendan Marsh about Spotify and its way of working, the obvious question being: Is there a ‘Spotify Model?’ Also, we list three critical issues leading to less effective Retrospectives, from inconsistency to a lack of contributions to failure to follow up on action items, and point out that SAFe may not be ideal, but applying it may lead to a higher level of business agility, depending on the environment and context.

Then, Maret Kruve remembers her challenges when starting as a product manager, being an introvert, and how she coped with them. Also, we learn suggestions for encouraging engineers to involve themselves more effectively in the ideation process. In a shocking revelation, Michalina Bidzinska explains why “listening to users is less important than observing their actions,” as they all lie to us.

Finally, we reflect on issues and challenges when using NPS beyond its intended purpose as a consumer research tool and ask ChatGPT to help us with OKR design. Speaking of metrics, Tendayi Viki dissects the idea of return on investment for innovation, distinguishing two realms: the “innovation team lives in Explore, whereas the executive board lives in Exploit.” Lastly, we explore how Chinese companies “prioritize autonomy at scale, internal digital platforms, and a clear project focus.”

Did you miss the previous Food for Agile Thought’s issue 386?

🗞 Shall I notify you about articles like this one? Awesome! You can sign up here for the ‘Food for Agile Thought’ newsletter and join 45,000-plus subscribers.

🎓 Join Stefan in one of his upcoming Professional Scrum training classes!

📖 Get notified when the Scrum Anti-Patterns Guide book is available!


No alt text provided for this image

Join your peers on May 4, 2023HoA EXTRA: How Elon Musk Would Run YOUR Business with Joe Justice.


🏆 The Tip of the Week


📈 Shane Hastie (via InfoQ): Culture & Methods Trends Report March 2023

Shane Hastie introduces the latest trends in engineering, from culture handbooks to LLM-supported development to scaling frameworks entering the Late Majority.

Source: InfoQ: 📈 Culture & Methods Trends Report March 2023

Author: Shane Hastie


🍋 The Lemon of the Week


(via UX Collective): Scrum is just as bad as SAFe — adopt it at your own risk

In another round of Scrum bashing, Henrik Ståhl claims that “Scrum is just as bad as SAFe. Adopt it at your own risk,” without adding much insight to the discussion than unsubstantiated claims.

Source: UX Collective: Scrum is just as bad as SAFe — adopt it at your own risk


➿ Agile & Scrum


🎙 Brendan Marsh: What really happened at Spotify

In this podcast, Murray Robinson and Shane Gibson interview Brendan Marsh about his time at Spotify and its way of working.

Source:🎙 What really happened at Spotify

Author: Brendan Marsh


Enrico Teotti (via Agile Alliance): Why your retros don’t work and how to fix them

Enrico Teotti lists three critical issues leading to less effective Retrospectives, from inconsistency to a lack of contributions to failure to follow up on action items.

Source: Agile Alliance: Why your retros don’t work and how to fix them

Author: Enrico Teotti


📺 Mike Cottmeyer (via Leading Agile): On Managing Expectations of Methodologies & Frameworks

Mike Cottmeyer delves into SAFe’s shortcomings; however, he also points out that applying SAFe may lead to a higher level of business agility, depending on the environment and context.

Source: Leading Agile: 📺 On Managing Expectations of Methodologies & Frameworks

Author: Mike Cottmeyer


🎓 🖥 💯 🇬🇧 Professional Scrum Facilitation Skills Class — May 16, 2023

The Professional Scrum Facilitation Skills (PSFS) training by Berlin Product People is a guaranteed one-day official Scrum.org class for advanced Scrum practitioners and agile coaches, including the industry-acknowledged PSFS certification. This PSFS training class is in English.

Enjoy the benefits of an live-virtual immersive class with like-minded agile peers from 09:00–17:30 o’clock CET.

No alt text provided for this image

Learn more: 🖥 💯 🇬🇧 Professional Scrum Facilitation Skills Class — May 16, 2023.

👉 From time to time, we can offer last-minute seats for training classes at cost to individuals who do not have access to a corporate training budget. If you like to be notified about these opportunities, please register here.


🎯 Product


Maret Kruve (via Medium): How I Survived the Lifestyle of a Product Manager as an Introvert

Maret Kruve remembers her challenges when starting as a product manager, being an introvert, and how she coped with them.

Source: Medium: How I Survived the Lifestyle of a Product Manager as an Introvert

Author: Maret Kruve


Teresa Torres: Product in Practice: Getting Engineers Involved in Brainstorming

Ellen Juhlin asked Teresa Torres’ community for suggestions on encouraging engineers to involve themselves more effectively in the ideation process.

Source: Product in Practice: Getting Engineers Involved in Brainstorming

Author: Teresa Torres


Michalina Bidzinska (via uxdesign.cc): Everybody Lies. Your Users Too.

Michalina Bidzinska explains why “listening to users is less important than observing their actions.”

Source: uxdesign.cc: Everybody Lies. Your Users Too.

Author: Michalina Bidzinska


📯 Workshop Design with ChatGPT

The following article explores whether we can use ChatGPT-4 to create workshops for agile practitioners; for example, Scrum Masters. While Liberating Structures have simplified the task, workshop design with ChatGPT may provide an alternative.

As you will learn, and despite being prone to lapse into project management speak, ChatGPT is remarkably capable of doing so, provided we feed it suitable prompts. Whether this requirement gives ChatGPT an edge over manually creating workshops remains to be seen.

No alt text provided for this image

👉 Learn moreWorkshop Design with ChatGPT.


🛠 Concepts, Tools & Measuring


(via Mind The Product): The 9 ugliest truths about NPS in B2B

Paula Stürmer reflects on issues and challenges when using NPS beyond its intended purpose as a consumer research tool.

Source: Mind The Product: The 9 ugliest truths about NPS in B2B


Tim Herbig: I asked ChatGPT to write your OKRs

Tim Herbig shows “the impact that context through strategy can have on OKR design using a mechanical sparring partner.”

Source: I asked ChatGPT to write your OKRs

Author: Tim Herbig


🎶 Encore


Tendayi Viki (via Strategyzer): ROI for innovation

Tendayi Viki dissects the idea of return on investment for innovation, distinguishing two realms: the “innovation team lives in Explore, whereas the executive board lives in Exploit.”

Source: Strategyzer: ROI for innovation

Author: Tendayi Viki


(via Harvard Business Review): How Chinese Companies Are Reinventing Management

Mark J. Greeven, Katherine Xin, and George S. Yip explore how Chinese companies “prioritize autonomy at scale, internal digital platforms, and a clear project focus.”

Source: Harvard Business Review: How Chinese Companies Are Reinventing Management


📅 Training Classes, Meetups & Events 2023

Upcoming classes and events:

👉 See all upcoming classes here

🗞️ Last Week’s Food for Agile Thought Edition

Read more: Food for Agile Thought 386: Scrum Police, Marty Cagan on Transformations, Agile Bureaucracy, Trust In Product Management?

📺 Join 4,000-plus Agile Peers on Youtube

Now available on the Age-of-Product Youtube channel:

✋ Do Not Miss Out: Join the 12,000-plus Strong ‘Hands-on Agile’ Slack Community

I invite you to join the “Hands-on Agile” Slack Community and enjoy the benefits of a fast-growing, vibrant community of agile practitioners from around the world.

No alt text provided for this image

If you like to join all you have to do now is provide your credentials via this Google form, and I will sign you up. By the way, it’s free.

🎓 Do You Want to Read more like this?

Well, then:

Food for Agile Thought 387: Culture & Methods Trends 2023, The Introverted Product Manager, Spotify’s Way of Working, Users Lie to Us was first published on Age-of-Product.com.

Paula Stürmer

Product Manager & Product Coach | B2B SaaS Specialist | Driving Product Success from Inception to Market

1y

What a pleasure to be mentioned in the same newsletter as Tim Herbig. Thank you, Stefan Wolpers, for highlighting my article on Mind the Product

Philip Ledgerwood

I take the risk out of your software development projects and make them valuable, efficient, and predictable.

1y

Referring to the Lemon, I'm not sure there's value for the author to contrast the Scrum Guide with the Agile Manifesto. This is a rookie mistake - assuming Scrum is a "way to become agile" just like other ways to become agile. Scrum is an approach to developing product that allows the product to be adapted in response to complex environments. The words "agile" or "agility" don't even occur in the Scrum guide. It's an approach to developing products in a particular market environment. It's not an approach to agile software development, at least not in the sense the Manifesto is describing. There's definitely some overlap, but the critiques only make sense if Scrum is a generic way to become agile. It isn't. It's actually not a good fit for a decent chunk of software development endeavors. Convincing the market that Scrum was the same as agile software development is the greatest trick the Devil ever pulled.

Brett Maytom

Subscribe to weekly newsletter for articles ✦ Coddiwompler

1y

Yep, I saw that lemon and it’s classic misunderstanding of Scrum. I read it as a big article that says “I have no idea what I am doing”. Its like saying “hammers are the worst tools ever, because they cannot cut metal. Don’t buy or use hammers. ”

Michael Küsters

Thought Provoker / COO - AI / Edge Computing

1y

I'm not so sure that your Lemon is such a lemon. It has valid impulses. Here's one statement that should make people think, if they're doing it: "Raise your hand if you believe eight-hour meetings are effective." Yes, if you do Scrum the way the Guide says, you might have 3-hour, 4-hour and 8-hour meetings. Or, "events." Po-tay-to. Point is, there are tons of ineffective and even failing teams doing very well on executing the mechanics of Scrum. Is it okay based on the Scrum Guide to split Sprint Planning over multiple days? Yes. But it's often considered ineffective. So why provide people guidance that is a red herring, when the thing people truly need is something simple to understand that won't have quirky side effects when done as instructed.

To view or add a comment, sign in

Insights from the community

Others also viewed

Explore topics