From Atoms To Words #4: Multiscale Simulations From DNA to Electrification
Welcome to From Atoms to Words, where this month we ride on a summer breeze, from DNA to electrification. After a sunny detour into the impressive abilities of large language models
🤯 Did you know that if you took all the DNA from a single human cell and stretched it out, it would be a whopping 1,80 meters long? In fact, there is enough DNA in an average human to stretch it from the sun to pluto and back. About 11 times.
😳 Now, how do you simulate that? More specifically, how do you simulate the DNA
The study of DNA is like the ultimate melting pot of biology, physics, and chemistry. And theoretical methods
So, simulating DNA is challenging. Why?
📏 Imagine this: Although with DNA you can travel the solar system, the distance between individual base pairs is in the minuscule angstrom range. Some changes to DNA occur over the course of years, while others, like chromatin reorganization during the cell cycle, take place within a single day. Meanwhile, the local movements of nucleobases happen in mere milliseconds, while electronic rearrangements take place in a mind-bending sub-femtosecond time-scale.
And that’s why simulating DNA is a challenge of epic proportions: because of the wide range of time and spatial scales involved in its processes. For this reason, multiscale simulations of DNA are needed, from quantum chemistry
Curious yet?
In my article 🔷 Multiscale simulations of DNA: From Quantum Effects to Mesoscopic Processes 🔷 you will read about:
🧪 Quantum chemistry to investigate base pairs
🧪 QM/MM and ab initio molecular dynamics for DNA reactivity and dynamics
🧪 Classical molecular dynamics - because of course, force fields rock
🧪 And if that is not enough, a glimpse on the world of coarse graining for mega DNA structures
⚛️ Read further: ➡️ Multiscale Simulations of DNA: From Quantum Effects to Mesoscopic Processes | #FromAtomsToWords
🙀 Will large language models ever become better chemists than us humans?
Whether you are computational chemist, an experimental researcher, or someone who wouldn’t know a pipette from a pineapple, chances are you’ve heard whispers of the mystical beings known as large language models.
Oh, but of course you have! You certainly encountered, used, loved, or perhaps hated, chatGPT.
We’re talking about language models that can answer questions, summarize texts, convert files, and do all sorts of phenomenal stuff.
You just need to ask nicely.
🎸 ChatGPT and its cohorts are like the rock stars of natural language processing, using cutting-edge machine learning to generate text that’s so darn good, it’s hard to tell it apart from human writing.
Hello there, Mr. Turing!
From a scientific standpoint, the implications are nothing short of revolutionary.
These language models can whip up abstracts for scientific articles with a flick of their digital wrists. They can craft lines of code tailored to specific programming tasks like a virtuoso on a twelve-string. And that’s not all—they can even take on challenges they were never explicitly trained for, like some kind of machine-learning sorcerer. 🎱
It’s as if they possess an innate adaptability, an insatiable hunger for tackling fresh obstacles. A chilling thought, if you think about it.
Now, if these large language models can handle tasks they weren’t initially designed for, could they also hold the answers to the scientific questions that have plagued us for centuries?
Take chemistry, for example. Just imagine being able to ask these language models questions like:
📌 If I swap the metal in my metal-organic framework, will it be moisture-stable?
📌 What’s the free energy landscape of that DNA transition?
Recommended by LinkedIn
📌 What is the role of hydrogen bonding in that biological process?
Effortlessly, these language models may present the answers to our burning questions in the blink of an eye, leaving us mortals to wonder:
🧐 Are these responses to be trusted? Is this the beginning of a new era for chemistry?
🔭 Discover it all in ➡️ Large Language Models for Chemistry: Is the Beginning of a New Era? | #FromAtomsToWords
😄 If you told my younger self that I’d end up working on simulations for next-generation battery design, he would have laughed at you.
🧬 I mean, come on, I was all about DNAs and proteins – the little heroes that keep our bodies ticking against almighty entropy.
But here’s the thing: life is full of surprises. And today, alongside my colleagues at Quantistry , we’re collaborating with some of the world’s largest players to push the boundaries of next-generation battery design and create a brighter, more sustainable future.
🤔 So, what can atomistic simulations
In my article 🔷 Computer-Aided Next-Generation Battery Design 🔷 you will read about:
📌 Why should you care about batteries?
📌 Next-gen battery design: why is that a combinatorial minefield?
📌 What R&D challenges can you solve with atomistic simulations?
🎁 Plus, you will discover 3 success stories of computer-aided battery design.
Curious to learn more?
📚 Visit ➡️ Computer-Aided Next-Generation Battery Design: From Edisonian Trial-and-Error to Atomistic Simulations | #FromAtomsToWords
+3 Bonus Stories
➡️ 7 Noncovalent Interactions in Proteins: The Hidden Architects of Structures and Functions [Read more]
➡️ Let’s Fight Climate Change with the Computational Design of Metal-Organic Frameworks [Read more]
➡️ Quantum Nanoreactor Simulations of the Early Universe: The Dawn of Interstellar Chemistry [Read more]
Did you find this newsletter helpful or insightful?
Subscribe to #FromAtomsToWords to receive future stories about quantum chemistry and the world around it. Let me know your comments or suggestions below, and thank you for reading!
#QuantistryLab #researchanddevelopment #ComputationalChemistry #QuantumChemistry #AtomisticSimulations #MolecularDynamics #DNA #NextGenBattery #EnergyStorage #AI #LargeLanguageModels #MachineLearning #NaturalLanguageProcessing #ChatGPT #InverseDesign #QMMM #CarParrinelloMolecularDynamics #CoarseGraining #ForceField #epigenetics #Nucleosome #HydrogenBonding
🌱Impact Optimist |🔍Research-driven VC |🌍Climate & Healthcare Innovations🧬
1yZoe Peden
Senior Operations Manager at Diamond Light Source
1yHi Roberto, in your cisplatin picture, I take you mean in the model from the classical field the bases would be further away from the Platin atom. Are those 4 models frames in a time series? More questions 🙄 : how do you account for electron delocalisation along the DNA strand when modelling DNA fragments?