From Big Bang to Black Holes: The Empirical and Metaphysical Boundaries of the Universe

Comment.

Q: What are the boundaries between physics and metaphysics (posing as theoretical physics)?

A: You can’t, in principle, do direct experiments in those non-experimentally supported cases. Whilst indirect experiments can support a variety of unfalsifiable interpretations, they are, at best, “plausible” metaphysical alternatives. And there may be an infinite number of such!

*****

Title: From Big Bang to Black Holes: The Empirical and Metaphysical Boundaries of the Universe

Abstract:

The observable universe is marked by its finite nature, having a clear beginning with the Big Bang and potentially a defined end. In contrast, black holes present an intriguing cosmic boundary through their event horizons, beyond which lies a singularity characterized by theoretical infinity. This paper explores the finite aspects of the observable universe, its possible endings, and the implications of potential universes beyond our observational capacity. Additionally, it compares these features to the unobservable nature of black holes, emphasizing the speculative nature of discussing interiors and horizons without empirical evidence. The paper concludes with reflections on the metaphysical nature of such cosmic constructs when they fall outside the realm of direct observation and measurement.

1. Introduction

As understood through modern cosmology, the universe is finite in its observable extent and has a defined beginning known as the Big Bang. Yet, while we can observe much of the universe, significant aspects remain beyond our reach, both in time and space. Similarly, black holes introduce the concept of event horizons and singularities that challenge physical understanding and observation boundaries. This paper aims to dissect these two cosmic phenomena and explore the metaphysical implications of discussing what lies beyond our observational limits.

2. The Finite Nature of the Observable Universe

The observable universe is finite, constrained by the light that has travelled to us since the Big Bang approximately 13.8 billion years ago [1]. The edge of this visible boundary defines what we can empirically observe and study. Several theories suggest how the universe might eventually end, each influenced by the interplay between dark energy, gravity, and cosmic expansion:

• 2.1 Heat Death (Big Freeze): If the universe continues expanding indefinitely, it will result in a gradual cooling and eventual thermodynamic equilibrium where no significant processes occur [2].

• 2.2 Big Crunch: Should the universe’s density surpass a critical threshold, gravitational forces may reverse its expansion, culminating in a collapse back to a high-density state, potentially a singularity [3].

• 2.3 Big Rip: If dark energy’s influence grows, it could accelerate the expansion until all cosmic structures, down to atomic particles, are torn apart [4].

• 2.4 Big Bounce: This theory posits that the universe might follow a cycle of expansions and contractions, where the end of one cycle results in the birth of a new one, suggesting the existence of multiple universes across time [5].

These potential outcomes frame the universe as a finite entity despite its vastness.

3. The Concept of Unobservable Universes

While some models propose that there were universes before the Big Bang or that others may follow a potential end of this one, these remain outside our observational reach [6]. Sabine Hossenfelder, in her book Lost in Math: How Beauty Leads Physics Astray, emphasizes that some concepts embraced in physics, like multiverses, edge dangerously close to metaphysical speculation when they are beyond testable predictions [7]. These hypothetical universes and the nature of future ones that might emerge are fundamentally non-testable and, by extension, metaphysical. This reinforces the notion that any discussions of universes beyond our observable horizon are theoretical frameworks without empirical support.

4. Black Holes and the Event Horizon

Black holes offer another example of cosmic finitude and hidden infinities. The event horizon represents a boundary from which no information or matter can escape, effectively sealing off the interior of the black hole from external observation [8]. The singularity within, defined as a point of infinite density, challenges the known laws of physics and introduces a boundary beyond which our current theories cannot predict outcomes [9]. The unobservable nature of these singularities places them in a similar category as untestable speculative concepts—part of theoretical physics but not necessarily subject to direct verification.

5. Comparing the Observable Universe and Black Hole Horizons

Both the observable universe and black holes have conceptual boundaries: the observable universe is limited by the cosmic horizon, while a black hole’s event horizon marks its boundary. The Big Bang singularity parallels a black hole’s singularity in that both are regions of spacetime where current physical models fail due to extreme conditions. However, while we can study the history of the observable universe through empirical evidence, the interior of a black hole remains hidden and speculative [10].

6. The Metaphysical Nature of Unobservable Constructs

The speculation regarding other potential universes—past or future—or what exists beyond a black hole’s event horizon, including its singularity, approaches the realm of metaphysics. As Hossenfelder and other physicists argue, without empirical testing, these ideas remain in the domain of theoretical extrapolation rather than concrete science [7]. Although mathematical models and theoretical physics can suggest what might lie beyond our observational limits, without observable data or experimental validation, such constructs should be approached as metaphysical interpretations rather than empirical realities.

7. Conclusion

While the observable universe is finite, with potential beginnings and ends that align with current cosmological theories, and black holes present physical boundaries beyond which we cannot observe, both cases highlight the limits of our understanding. Speculating about regions beyond our reach—whether before the Big Bang, within black holes, or other unobservable universes—relies on metaphysical and theoretical interpretations. The pursuit of understanding these hidden infinities pushes the boundaries of science into the realm of philosophy, where empirical evidence ceases, and theoretical extrapolation begins.

References:

1. Hawking, S. W., & Ellis, G. F. R. (1973). The Large Scale Structure of Space-Time. Cambridge University Press.

2. Adams, F. C., & Laughlin, G. (1997). The Five Ages of the Universe. Simon & Schuster.

3. Barrow, J. D., & Tipler, F. J. (1986). The Anthropic Cosmological Principle. Oxford University Press.

4. Caldwell, R. R., Kamionkowski, M., & Weinberg, N. N. (2003). Phantom Energy and Cosmic Doomsday. Physical Review Letters.

5. Steinhardt, P. J., & Turok, N. (2002). A Cyclic Model of the Universe. Science.

6. Penrose, R. (2010). Cycles of Time: An Extraordinary New View of the Universe. Bodley Head.

7. Hossenfelder, S. (2018). Lost in Math: How Beauty Leads Physics Astray. Basic Books.

8. Thorne, K. S. (1994). Black Holes and Time Warps: Einstein’s Outrageous Legacy. W. W. Norton & Company.

9. Wald, R. M. (1984). General Relativity. University of Chicago Press.

10. Bekenstein, J. D. (1973). Black Holes and Entropy. Physical Review D.

*****

The attached image (full image in comments) depicts four cosmic concepts: Big Bang, Black Hole, Big Crunch, and Big Freeze (a slow progression to a void - with no possibility of thermodynamic work/interaction).