From Firefighting to Future-Proofing: How Strategic Training Partnerships Drive Real Business Impact [Part 1]
This article showcases a reenactment of a productive conversation between a client and the Chief Learning Officer (CLO) of a training provider, illustrating how a strategic partnership can elevate learning and development initiatives. The discussion highlights the shift from reactive, one-size-fits-all training to a more tailored, just-in-time learning approach, ensuring that training is delivered when it’s most relevant and impactful. By aligning learning programmes with business goals and tracking KPIs such as client retention and productivity, organisations can demonstrate clear ROI, which is crucial for securing future investment. This conversation serves as a great example of how early collaboration and continuous dialogue can lead to innovative, cost-effective, and high-impact training solutions.
CLO: Thank you for meeting with us today. We’re keen to understand how we can collaborate more effectively to drive impactful learning outcomes in your organisation. How do you currently approach learning and development?
Head of L&D (L&D): Thanks for reaching out. Right now, our focus is on aligning training with our business goals. We want learning to directly contribute to the skills that our teams need to drive performance. But sometimes, we struggle with tailoring training solutions to meet specific needs quickly enough. And, of course, managing budgets is always top of mind.
CLO: That’s a common challenge we hear from many financial services organisations. The need for agility in learning while being mindful of budget constraints can be difficult to balance. One solution is building a more strategic partnership with your training provider, where we work more closely to anticipate and address learning needs before they become urgent. This allows for more proactive planning rather than reactive training. Does that sound like it could alleviate some of the pressure?
For instance, we’ve worked with a financial services firm where we designed a 12-month training roadmap. Instead of waiting for specific skills gaps to arise, we developed a plan based on anticipated regulatory changes and internal business developments. This approach helped them spread their budget over the year more evenly and ensured that training needs were addressed before they became critical, reducing both cost and stress.
L&D: Yes, we’ve been thinking along similar lines. One of our frustrations is that by the time a need is identified, we’re often in firefighting mode, scrambling to implement training just as it’s needed. We’re very interested in the idea of ‘just-in-time’ learning—delivering training when it’s most relevant—but it’s hard to execute without a more strategic approach.
CLO: Absolutely. Just-in-time learning can be a game-changer if it’s done well. To make it work, the key is being able to forecast upcoming business challenges and align learning solutions to those. This way, employees get the training they need exactly when it’s most relevant, and they can apply it immediately. A more strategic partnership allows us to work with you to develop a learning pipeline that can flex as new priorities arise. We can co-create a framework that delivers bite-sized, targeted learning modules available on demand. This would allow your teams to access training at the point of need, making it more practical and impactful.
L&D: That sounds like something that could help us in areas like leadership, data, AI, which are all key areas where change is rapid. I imagine this approach would also help keep costs more manageable, as we could focus on delivering content that is timely rather than a large-scale training rollout that may or may not be relevant across all teams.
CLO: Exactly. A more flexible, just-in-time learning model allows for more efficient use of your budget. Rather than committing to extensive in-person workshops or entire learning modules at once, you can focus on delivering specific, high-priority content when needed. This can also help with buy-in from stakeholders, as you can demonstrate immediate value by providing the right training at the right time. And when it comes to managing costs, a strategic partnership can further alleviate budget pressures by planning for long-term needs. By being involved in your planning process, we can help you forecast training costs more accurately and avoid the unpredictability of last-minute training needs.
We recently worked with a large asset management firm, where we developed a blended learning approach. Instead of committing to a full-day workshop for all employees, we rolled out targeted micro-learning sessions for specific teams. These sessions were spread over the year and aligned with budget availability, which made it easier for the L&D team to manage costs and justify the spend to senior management. The training was provided as and when it was needed, improving efficiency and cost-effectiveness.
L&D: That’s very appealing. Budget management is one of the key challenges we face, especially when we need to show ROI to justify our spending. Often, learning outcomes aren’t immediately measurable, which makes it difficult to quantify the impact and justify future investments.
Recommended by LinkedIn
CLO: We hear that from a lot of clients, especially in the financial services sector. That’s why we focus heavily on measuring impact and demonstrating ROI. One of the benefits of a closer partnership is the ability to align KPIs with your specific business outcomes from the outset. Rather than just measuring course completion or learner satisfaction, we can tie the training directly to performance metrics like client retention, sales performance, or even speed to market for new products.
For example, when working with a client in the private banking sector, we designed a leadership development programme where the success wasn’t just measured by how many employees completed the training. Instead, we tracked the impact on client satisfaction and team productivity over the following six months. This gave the L&D team tangible evidence of how the training contributed to improved business outcomes, making it easier to justify future investments.
L&D: That makes sense. We’ve struggled in the past with proving the value of softer skills training, for example. While the feedback is often positive, it’s hard to tie it back to concrete business results. How do you typically track ROI for something like leadership development or client-facing skills?
CLO: We work closely with our clients to identify business-specific KPIs that reflect the desired outcomes. For leadership development, we might track things like team engagement scores, reduction in turnover, or even how well leaders manage change within their departments. For client-facing skills, metrics like client satisfaction, time spent on issue resolution, or upselling success can be good indicators. The important thing is to establish these KPIs from the start, so we can measure the impact of the training consistently and report back to your leadership team on the business value.
In one case, we implemented a client engagement training programme for a wealth management firm. Rather than focusing solely on how employees felt about the training, we tracked the increase in client retention rates and cross-sell opportunities six months after the training. The result was a significant improvement in both areas, allowing the L&D team to demonstrate the direct impact of the training on business growth.
L&D: That’s very helpful. I think the key takeaway for us is the importance of involving you earlier in our planning process. That way, we can ensure training is not only timely but also aligned with our budgetary cycles and business priorities. Plus, having those KPIs in place would make it much easier to report on ROI to senior management.
CLO: Exactly. When we work as strategic partners, we can ensure that learning is not just reactive but a proactive tool that helps drive your business forward. By embedding ourselves into your organisation and understanding your goals, we can create a learning roadmap that aligns with both your immediate needs and long-term objectives. This also allows us to monitor progress together, ensuring continuous improvement and clear demonstration of the value that training brings.
With one of our long-term clients in the insurance space, we set up quarterly reviews to track how well our training was delivering against key business objectives. Over the course of a year, we refined the training approach based on performance data and changing business needs. This ongoing collaboration not only improved training effectiveness but also provided the L&D team with the data needed to demonstrate the ROI of the programme to senior stakeholders, securing continued investment in learning and development.
L&D: It sounds like a great approach. Let’s start with a pilot programme, focusing on just-in-time learning for one of our teams, and see how we can evolve the partnership from there. I’m optimistic that this could really help us tackle our challenges more effectively.
CLO: We’d be excited to partner with you on that. Let’s schedule a time to dive deeper into your current needs and map out a plan that can demonstrate the real business outcomes of learning.
Qualified Systemic Business Coach | Leadership Trainer | Leadership Consultant | German & English speaking 🇩🇪🇬🇧| Member ICF | FRSA | Member Institute of Leadership |
2moThis makes my heart sing, Hector Payne! A powerful way for organisations and training providers to collaborate early and closely for measurable, high impact success.
Very interesting article on how to move from a re-active approach to training to a more pro-active one.
Leadership in Banking I Change Management I Financial Advisory I Learning and Talent Management Expert
2moVery relevant points, Hector.