The Future of Soldier’s Ammunition

The Future of Soldier’s Ammunition

Marksman, Sharpshooter, or Expert! Regardless of what rating you receive during individual weapons training and qualification. It is a basic fundamental of all soldiers. If you have been in the United States Army in the last three decades, you more than likely have completed the qualification using the 5.56mm center-fire ammunition cartridge. The complete round includes the cartridge case, bullet, propellant, and primer, fired from the individually assigned weapon. As a young soldier entering basic combat training, this may have been the first time you fired a weapon. Let alone, given ammunition to use the firearm.

Current Ammunition

The ammunition fired over the last three decades was the M193 first fired when the Army adopted the M16 rifle in 1967. Or the M855 round that replaced the M193 in 1982. While national stockpiles still survive of both rounds, replacement of the ammunition has long been underway to replace current stocks and making the rounds priority for training. In the last decade, in 2010, the Army introduced the Enhanced Performance Round (EPR), which dramatically improved hard target performance and provided a lead-free projectile—presenting the third round that has become familiar to a majority of soldiers. The ammunition makes up the larger portion of a soldier’s 210 rounds of combat load.  With the Department of Defense Identification Codes: A071, A059, and AB57, respectively.

No alt text provided for this image

Figure 1. M193, M855, and M855A1. Source: Twobirdflying Publication.


Next Generation Squad Weapons (NGSW)

The common feature of these rounds is the 5.56mm caliber which is far different than current prototyping effort for the United States Army’s new weapon system. The Next Generation Squad Weapons (NGSW) Program consists of a new rifle and automatic rifle with a standard 6.8mm cartridge. The variant of the 6.8mm round will be known as the XM1184. The prototyping for the weapons and ammunition has come down to three companies. The SIG SAUER system consisting of 6.8mm hybrid ammunition, True Velocity’s 6.8mm composite-cased cartridge, and Textron Systems 6.8mm cased telescope (CT) ammunition.

No alt text provided for this image

Figure 2. NGSW Weapons and Ammunition. Source: State of Guns.


Future Ammunition

The first and the most familiar include the company SIG SAUER 6.8mm hybrid ammunition. The ammunition is a three-piece metallic design with a 20% reduction in the overall cartridge and increased velocity over conventional ammunition. With a brass body on top of a possible steel base. While the SIG SAUER 6.8mm hybrid ammunition round was patent-pending technology. It so happens that SIG SAUER was able to use the two years of R&D with the cartridge for the military and introduce the round to the commercial market with the 277 SIG FURY.


No alt text provided for this image

Figure 3. SIG FURY hybrid case ammunition. Source: Recoil Gun Magazine.

The second, distinct but still familiar, is True Velocity Composite-Cased Ammunition. The 6.8 TVCM round is a 6.8mm composite cased round. This ammunition has a polymer body with a metal base. And the round offers a 30% reduction in weight over traditional brass-cased cartridges. Developed in 8 weeks but with ballistic data and specifications currently confidential.

No alt text provided for this image

Figure 4. 6.8 TVCM round. Source: True Velocity.

The third and least familiar round is the Textron Systems cased telescope (CT) ammunition. The round is a plastic polymer that surrounds the projectile. While Textron does not specify the 6.8, Textron Systems states that “cased-telescoped (CT) weapons and ammunition systems deliver improved maneuverability and performance at 40% less weight than currently fielded systems.”

No alt text provided for this image

Figure 5. 6.8 Cased Telescope (CT) ammunition. Source: Textron Systems.


Conclusion

In fiscal year FY21, the program will go into 2nd prototype testing with onward selection to one vendor and production decision. And in FY22, the military has planned new equipment fielding to units. The advantages for each round include increased performance and reduction in weight. The new ammunition also has drawbacks that include unestablished supply chains and a lack of robust manufacturers. The selection of the new ammunition will affect individual soldiers from those nearing the end of their careers to new soldiers entering basic training. But eventually, just as 30 years ago, soldiers qualified on the M16 with M193 round. The future warfighter will qualify with the new 6.8mm weapon system and ammunition. As soldiers, we must remember that the only constant in the military is change.

Javier Gonzalez Cuesta BEng / LSSYB / ATEX / MIExpE / MISEE

CEO at KA Safe Engineering / 25y in Industrial Demilitarization - Fixed & Mobile facilities / 28y as Project Management Professional / 32y in Commercial and Military Explosives Engineering and Plants Management

4y

Very interesting Michael (Mike)

To view or add a comment, sign in

More articles by Michael (Mike) Lima, DBA

  • Arsenals, Depots, and Ammunition Plants

    Arsenals, Depots, and Ammunition Plants

    The Department of the Army’s Organic Industrial Base encompasses arsenals, depots, and ammunition plants along with…

    2 Comments
  • Microstamping and the Serialization of Ammunition

    Microstamping and the Serialization of Ammunition

    One of the most divisive topics in America is gun control law. The Second Amendment to the United States Constitution…

    6 Comments
  • Ammunition Supply Discrepancy Reporting

    Ammunition Supply Discrepancy Reporting

    For ammunition support activities, one of the most routine processes is the receipt of supplies. The transaction adds…

  • Radioactive Depleted Uranium Munitions

    Radioactive Depleted Uranium Munitions

    Introduction Caution. Radiation! These words would catch anyone off guard, let alone have the responsibility to handle…

    5 Comments
  • Underwater Munitions Dumping

    Underwater Munitions Dumping

    The definition of “demilitarization” is the act of destroying the military types of equipment and material to the…

    4 Comments
  • CAT I, SRC I, or CIIC 1: Is there a difference?

    CAT I, SRC I, or CIIC 1: Is there a difference?

    Ammunition and Explosives (AE) have codes that provide the information on needed security requirements for storage and…

    4 Comments
  • China Analysis: Logistics of Ammunition

    China Analysis: Logistics of Ammunition

    In combat, soldiers can survive some amount of time without food, water, or medicine, but they cannot live one minute…

  • Ammunition and Explosive Magazines

    Ammunition and Explosive Magazines

    Earth Covered Magazine (ECM) structures are built for the storage of ammunition and explosives. The ECMs are designed…

    4 Comments
  • Munitions Demilitarization

    Munitions Demilitarization

    Introduction Each week, units go to ammunition supply points to pick up munitions for training, and conduct exercises…

    3 Comments
  • Lessons Learned: Performance Work Statement Expectations Versus Reality of End State Deliverable.

    Lessons Learned: Performance Work Statement Expectations Versus Reality of End State Deliverable.

    Background An Army Ammunition Supply Point has been working under an inter-service support agreement (ISSA) with the…

    2 Comments

Insights from the community

Others also viewed

Explore topics