The Highwire Act between Agility and Regulation
My Thoughts on the Executive Order to Protect Americans’ Sensitive Personal Data
Upon reflection, the Executive Order issued by President Biden to safeguard Americans' sensitive personal data initially instilled a sense of optimism in me. The agility suggested by the order's approach promised a dynamic and flexible response mechanism to the rapidly evolving landscape of cybersecurity threats. The recognition of the diverse and sophisticated nature of these threats, including genomic, biometric, and financial data vulnerabilities, underscored a proactive stance that seemed to herald a new era of data protection.
However, as the details of the order unfolded, particularly with the introduction of bureaucratic structures such as the Department of Justice, Homeland Security, the Departments of Health and Human Services, Defense and Veterans Affairs for the creation of new regulations and standards, and for oversight and enforcement, my initial hope began to wane. While undoubtedly necessary for structured enforcement and accountability, this shift towards a compliance-focused framework raised concerns about the potential for sluggish responses to threats and a dampening of the agility critical in cybersecurity.
The balance between agility and compliance is a delicate one. On the one hand, agility allows for rapid identification and response to threats, embodying a mindset of continuous adaptation and evolution in the face of adversaries' ever-changing tactics. On the other hand, compliance ensures a systematic and thorough approach to safeguarding data, with checks and balances that are essential for consistency and reliability.
Yet, the bureaucratic details, with their inherent layers of approval and potential for delays, seem at odds with the very essence of agility. The challenge lies in implementing frameworks and regulations that retain the flexibility and speed of an agile response while still providing the structured oversight necessary for effective and consistent data protection.
Recommended by LinkedIn
As we navigate this new era of data security, it is imperative that we find a way to reconcile these seemingly opposing forces. The future of data protection depends on our ability to foster an environment where agility and compliance complement rather than conflict with each other, ensuring that we can swiftly adapt to threats without becoming entangled in red tape.
The Executive Order represents a step in the right direction, but its ultimate success will hinge on our ability to strike this balance. As we move forward, it is crucial that we remain vigilant, continuously evaluating and adjusting our approach to meet the demands of a rapidly evolving cybersecurity landscape. Only then can we hope to protect Americans' sensitive personal data effectively, ensuring their privacy and security in an increasingly digital world.
Unleashing the Power of the OODA Loop in Cybersecurity is my book that discusses the need to improve our agility in cybersecurity.
CISO | Board Advisor | Startup Mentor | Boardroom Certified QTE
9moWell said, Bob. It's not that the directive is *wrong*, but the added compliance burden is going to cause additional pressure on smaller companies and security teams. This approach is not sustainable.
Director | FAIR Evangelist | Educator | Quantitative Risk Lead at Kyndryl
9moGood read, Bob! “The most terrifying words in the English language are: I'm from the government and I'm here to help.” ― Ronald Reagan