How An “F” for Effort Motivates Better Than Praise for Good Intentions
Even when they know the basic rules of performance feedback, many of my clients feel, well, squeamish when they have to give tough performance feedback, particularly to longstanding employees.
They don’t want to hurt anyone’s feelings, be perceived as heavy-handed, or trigger subsequent backlash in the form of either worse performance or the demotivation of other staff members.
Sometimes managers think that it’s not worth bothering to give feedback because they don’t believe (often with good reason) that the employee will improve anyway, and that it’s better not to start on an upsetting and ineffective chain of events, given how hard many organizations work to avoid terminating any—or particular—employees.
It’s actually possible to get ahead of this kind of performance problem, but it requires the rejection of a major fallacy to which managers sometimes fall prey, and which may, in fact, come out of the child development and self-esteem literature of the past 20 years: the misplaced focus on effort instead of results.
Are You Satisfied with the Impression of Improvement?
We all can be such suckers for effort because we want so much to be understood and for problems to disappear. As a result, we don’t check back quickly enough to see if the effort has been sustained or if it’s petered out, or whether some additional application of our attention or other resources was necessary. We mentally close the case—and then we are shocked and hurt when backsliding occurs.
If you really want an employee’s performance to improve, though, consider three perspectives on candid, realistic, dispassionate performance feedback, particularly with tough cases.
Let the Rubber Meet the Road of Requirements
This is a very difficult line to draw, because of course we want to show that we value employees and colleagues as people. But if we don’t emphasize the effectiveness of their work, then it’s very hard to take the necessary steps when the work happens to be inadequate. A wonderful person may be wonderful as a worker or a friend, but there is no room for a poor worker in anyone’s work environment.
And a note: Some organizations—perhaps family businesses or nonprofits, for example—may prize relationships over effectiveness as a cultural norm, so keeping people working may be a crucial requirement. In those cases, instead of just stepping up performance feedback, try to find roles and responsibilities that actually match the strengths and capabilities of the person in question as a way of preserving job security. That’s a completely different approach to engineering job success.
Onward and upward—
LK
An earlier version of this post appeared on my Workplace Wisdom blog.
For a more personal take on work life, please visit LizKislik.com and click the “Subscribe” button in the navigation bar to receive my periodic email newsletter.
You can learn more about me and what I do here. Let me know your thoughts in the comments!