How is LCR Weight different from LCR Haircut
Dear Followers,
The Liquidity Coverage Ratio (LCR) is a key component of Basel III regulatory framework, aimed at ensuring that financial institutions maintain an adequate level of high-quality liquid assets (HQLA) to survive a 30-day stressed scenario. In this context, "LCR Weights" and "LCR Haircuts" are terms used to describe adjustments made to different categories of assets to reflect their liquidity and quality. Here's a breakdown of each:
LCR Weights
LCR Weights refer to the different percentages assigned to various types of high-quality liquid assets (HQLA) to determine their contribution to the LCR. These weights reflect the relative liquidity and stability of different asset classes under stressed conditions.
LCR Haircuts
LCR Haircuts are adjustments made to the market value of assets to reflect potential losses that could occur if the assets had to be sold quickly under stressed market conditions. These haircuts reduce the value of assets for the purpose of calculating the LCR, ensuring that institutions maintain a conservative measure of liquidity.
Level 1 Assets: Typically, no haircuts are applied to Level 1 assets due to their high liquidity.
Level 2A Assets: These assets are subject to a 15% haircut, meaning their market value is reduced by 15% for LCR calculations.
Level 2B Assets: These assets are subject to a 50% haircut, meaning their market value is reduced by 50% for LCR calculations.
Key Differences
- LCR Weights apply across all HQLA categories.
- LCR Haircuts specifically target Level 2A and Level 2B assets.
By using both weights and haircuts, regulators ensure that banks maintain a robust and conservative measure of their liquidity, capable of withstanding financial stress.
Liquidity Coverage Ratio (LCR) = Stock of HQLA / Total Net Cash Outflows over the Next 30 Calendar Days
Weights and Haircuts in LCR:
- If the Row ID corresponds to L1 assets, the LCR weights are set at 100%, and the Haircut is 0%.
- For L2A assets, LCR weights are 85%, and the Haircut is 15%.
- When dealing with L2B assets, LCR weights are 50%, and the Haircut is 50%.
Recommended by LinkedIn
Deriving the HQLA Formula:
HQLA value = Asset Value * LCR Weight (%)
and LCR Weighted Value = Asset Value - Haircut value
Example with Residential Mortgage-Backed Securities (RMBS):
Let’s break down the calculation step by step,
A) HQLA Value:
The High-Quality Liquid Asset (HQLA) value is calculated as follows:
HQLA Value = Asset Value × LCR Weight (%)
Given: Asset Value = USD 1000, LCR Weight = 50%
HQLA Value = USD 1000 × 50% = USD 500
B) LCR Weighted Value:
The LCR Weighted Value represents the portion of the asset value after accounting for the haircut:
LCR Weighted Value = Asset Value - Haircut value
Given: Haircut value = USD 500 (50% of the asset value)
LCR Weighted Value = USD 1000 - USD 500 = USD 500
📢 Calling all followers! 📢
I’d love to hear your thoughts on this: Do you believe these LCR haircuts accurately reflect an asset’s liquidity position during stress scenarios? Can banks rely on them?
Share your insights and any suggestions you might have for improving the accuracy of these haircuts. Let’s engage in a knowledge exchange!
Feel free to contribute!
Let’s delve into the concept of the “Run-off Factor”, which plays a crucial role in calculating the denominator of the Liquidity Coverage Ratio (LCR). The denominator represents the Total Net Cash Outflows over the Next 30 Calendar Days during stress scenarios. We’ll explore how this factor differs from both LCR Weight and LCR Haircut. Stay tuned for upcoming article!
#LCR #Baseliii #LiquidityRisk #RegulatoryRequirement #RegulatoryCompliance #RegulatoryReporting #LCRWeight #LCRHaircut #HQLA #NetCashOutflows #Level1Assets #Level2AAssets #Level2BAssets
Retired Bank Examiner Turned Blogger
5moHaircuts for LCR presuppose you can continue to repo the hair cutted assets , which may not be the case under stress. Including semi-liquid collateral with haircuts doesn’t work well in a liquidation scenario since sale could involve a big earnings hit & deplete capital.
Non Executive Chairperson at Surya Software Systems Private Limited
5moBabu Sathyanarayanan 1. The assumption that a specific asset will be liquid on a given day may be wrong. There are days beyond 1.99 sigma. 2. I am not sure if these haircuts have come from a study of liquidity in the market for a class of assets over a reasonable period of time. Are we overdoing or under doing the haircut is a question for which I have no answer 2. Concentration in a specific asset or a set of assets. 3. The moment I start selling a specific asset(s), market does sense a liquidity problem at my end and drive down the price. "Liquidity" Ramasastry Ambarish says "is ability to raise money that you don't need as the day you need it no one will give you".
Former - Group Head of Market & Liquidity Risk in DBS Bank (PhD 1990); Founder and Director, N-Category Advisers
5moNo concentration adjustments. Also level 1/2a & b varied across jurisdictions eg treatment of ABS and Covered bonds. Raising Home host and level playing field questions.
Fintech Implementation Consultant Buy and Sell Side, Business Analysis, Agile Project Mgnt, Fintech and Capital Markets Consulting. Collateral, Hedge Accounting, Liquidity Risk, BASEL-III and Back office Operations.
5moIdea of Haircut is good however there is jo standard mechanism for it. Most haircuts are VaR driven on a single security or asset. However weights are enough to judge how much stress is on each level and asset concentration on that category.