How to Understand Research Philosophies, Approaches, and Strategies

In academic research, understanding the foundational philosophies, approaches, and strategies is key to conducting meaningful studies. This guide will help you explore the complex layers of research design, making it easier to apply these concepts whether you're a student or a seasoned researcher.

The Research Onion: A Framework for Research Design

A helpful way to think about research design is by using the metaphor of an onion, where each layer represents a different aspect of your research. As you peel each layer, you move from broader elements like research philosophies down to specific elements like data collection methods.        

1. Research Philosophies: The Foundation of Research

At the outermost layer is your research philosophy. This refers to the beliefs you hold about the nature of reality, knowledge, and values. These beliefs will shape how you approach your research. Here are some common research philosophies:

Positivism: Positivists believe that reality is objective and can be measured. They often use quantitative methods such as experiments or surveys to test hypotheses. For example, a researcher might conduct a survey to test the impact of a new teaching method on student performance, analyzing the results using statistical techniques to establish clear, generalizable findings.        

Interpretivism: Interpretivists view reality as socially constructed and subjective. They prefer qualitative methods like interviews and case studies to understand the experiences of individuals. For instance, a researcher might interview teachers to explore how they adapt their teaching styles to different classroom dynamics, emphasizing the uniqueness of each teacher's perspective.

Critical Realism: This philosophy recognizes that there is an objective reality but believes it's essential to explore the deeper structures that shape observable outcomes. Researchers often use mixed methods, combining both quantitative and qualitative approaches. A study might, for instance, use statistical data to identify trends in education policy outcomes, followed by interviews to understand the underlying reasons for those trends.        

Post-Modernism: Post-modernists challenge traditional power structures and established truths. They use critical, qualitative approaches to highlight marginalized voices. For example, a researcher might analyze historical documents and personal narratives to deconstruct the dominant stories in a given field, revealing hidden power dynamics.

Pragmatism: Pragmatists prioritize practical solutions and use whatever methods are best suited to answering their research questions. They often adopt mixed methods, focusing on what works best. For instance, a study on public health might involve both surveys (quantitative) and interviews (qualitative) to develop practical strategies for improving healthcare access.        

2. Research Approaches: Deductive vs. Inductive

After establishing your research philosophy, you’ll need to decide whether to take a deductive or inductive approach.

Deductive Approach: This approach begins with a theory or hypothesis, which is then tested through data collection. It is often associated with positivism and quantitative research. For example, if you hypothesize that frequent feedback improves student performance, you might test this by collecting data from multiple classrooms and analyzing the results to confirm or reject your hypothesis.        

Inductive Approach: In contrast, the inductive approach begins with data collection, from which a theory is generated. This approach is more common in interpretivist and qualitative research. For instance, you might observe teachers in classrooms and then develop a theory about the role of flexibility in teaching based on what you observe.        

3. Research Strategies: Implementing the Philosophies

Once your philosophy and approach are clear, the next step is selecting a research strategy. Your strategy determines how you will conduct your research and gather data.

Experiment: This strategy involves manipulating one variable to observe its effect on another, usually within a controlled environment. For example, a researcher might introduce a new teaching technique to one group of students while keeping the teaching style unchanged for another, then compare the results.        

Survey: Surveys are used to gather data from a large group of people using standardized questions. This strategy is versatile and can support both qualitative and quantitative research, depending on how the questions are structured. A survey could be used to gauge public opinion on education reforms, with responses statistically analyzed to draw conclusions.        

Case Study: Case studies focus on an in-depth investigation of a single instance, such as a company, school, or individual. For example, a researcher might conduct a case study on a school that implemented a unique teaching method, exploring the results in detail through observations and interviews.

Ethnography: This strategy involves immersing yourself in a specific environment or community to observe and understand its culture and practices. For instance, a researcher might spend several months in a rural school district to observe the unique challenges faced by teachers and students.

Grounded Theory: Grounded theory is an inductive method where the researcher collects data and develops a theory based on that data. For example, after interviewing various professionals about career changes, a researcher might develop a theory on how job satisfaction evolves over time.        

Archival Research: This strategy involves analyzing existing documents or records to identify patterns or trends. A researcher might examine decades of school board meeting minutes to trace how educational policies have changed over time.        

4. Research Choices: Quantitative, Qualitative, or Mixed Methods?

After choosing a strategy, you need to decide whether your research will be quantitative, qualitative, or a mix of both.

Quantitative: Quantitative research involves collecting numerical data and using statistical methods to analyze it. This type of research is best when you need to measure something, like how many people use a particular product or the frequency of a specific behavior.

Qualitative: Qualitative research focuses on understanding concepts, thoughts, or experiences. It uses methods like interviews, focus groups, and content analysis to gather rich, detailed insights. For instance, qualitative research might explore why certain communities favor traditional medicine over modern healthcare.

Mixed Methods: Sometimes, it’s best to use both quantitative and qualitative methods to get a fuller picture. For example, a study on educational reform might combine student test scores (quantitative) with interviews from teachers and parents (qualitative) to understand the broader impact.        

Practical Application: Examples to Illustrate the Concepts

Quantitative Survey Example: A researcher distributes a survey to 500 students to test the hypothesis that online learning leads to better test scores. The results are analyzed statistically, revealing a significant correlation between online study time and test performance.

Qualitative Case Study Example: A researcher conducts in-depth interviews with five teachers in rural schools to explore how they overcome resource challenges. The case study uncovers a range of strategies that are tailored to local needs and available resources.

Mixed Methods Example: A researcher wants to understand the impact of a new health policy. They collect quantitative data on health outcomes but also conduct interviews with healthcare providers to gather qualitative insights on how the policy affects day-to-day operations.

Conclusion: The Importance of Systematic Research Design

In summary, a strong research design begins with understanding your philosophical stance, followed by choosing the right approach and strategy for your project. Whether you are testing hypotheses, exploring lived experiences, or examining historical trends, clarity in your research design will lead to more rigorous and impactful results. Remember, the key to effective research lies in systematic planning and a thoughtful approach to each stage of the process.

By peeling back each layer of the "Research Onion," you can ensure that your study is both methodologically sound and aligned with your research goals.

References:

• Bryman, A. (2016). Social research methods (5th ed.). Oxford University Press.
• Creswell, J. W. (2009). Research design: Qualitative, quantitative, and mixed methods approaches (3rd ed.). SAGE Publications.
• Creswell, J. W., & Creswell, J. D. (2017). Research design: Qualitative, quantitative, and mixed methods approaches (5th ed.). SAGE Publications.
• Flick, U. (2018). An introduction to qualitative research (6th ed.). SAGE Publications.
• Glaser, B. G., & Strauss, A. L. (1967). The discovery of grounded theory: Strategies for qualitative research. Aldine.
• Guba, E. G., & Lincoln, Y. S. (1994). Competing paradigms in qualitative research. In N. K. Denzin & Y. S. Lincoln (Eds.), Handbook of qualitative research (pp. 105-117). SAGE Publications.
• Robson, C., & McCartan, K. (2016). Real world research (4th ed.). Wiley.
• Saunders, M., Lewis, P., & Thornhill, A. (2019). Research methods for business students (8th ed.). Pearson.
• Silverman, D. (2015). Interpreting qualitative data (5th ed.). SAGE Publications.
• Tashakkori, A., & Teddlie, C. (2010). Mixed methodology: Combining qualitative and quantitative approaches (2nd ed.). SAGE Publications.
• Thomas, D. R. (2006). A general inductive approach for analyzing qualitative evaluation data. American Journal of Evaluation, 27(2), 237-246.
• Yin, R. K. (2017). Case study research and applications: Design and methods (6th ed.). SAGE Publications.
• Babbie, E. (2016). The practice of social research (14th ed.). Cengage Learning.