Is Imposter Syndrome Even Real?
by Rakshitha Arni Ravishankar, Associate Editor
I recently had a small get-together with friends, all of us women. At some point in the evening, we started talking about how we were feeling about our respective professional journeys. One of us, who had just gotten into a competitive PhD program, said she felt like her acceptance was luck. Another spoke about being a first-time manager. She was unsure if she was qualified for the job. A third spoke about how scared she was to launch her new career as a freelancer. Despite her years of experience and study, she wasn’t sure if she’d be any good.
For most people these feelings of self-doubt and insecurity are familiar. There’s a name for them — imposter syndrome — and research shows that women are much more likely to experience it. In fact, psychologists in the late 1970s found that, despite academic and professional brilliance, many high-achieving women still felt that they weren’t as smart and had fooled anyone who considered them successful.
Today, the question still lingers: What makes women constantly undermine our abilities, talents, and achievements in the first place?
Last year, HBR authors, Ruchika Tulshyan and Jodi-Ann Burey addressed this issue in their article, “Stop Telling Women They Have Imposter Syndrome.” They argue that imposter syndrome isn’t about low self-confidence. It’s a result of the systemic discrimination and marginalization that a lot of us, especially women of color, face as we navigate predominately white, male-dominated workplaces.
Numerous studies show that women get less feedback than their male counterparts, have a hard time negotiating for what they want, and are negatively judged when they don’t fit into neat stereotypes about their social behaviors. So, when women from marginalized backgrounds enter workplaces, they hold themselves up to such a high standard that it can create extra pressure. This becomes more difficult when you’re a woman at the intersection of other marginalized identities, such as race, class, caste, and sexuality.
Recommended by LinkedIn
In part, the reason women don’t feel like we belong is because we weren’t supposed to belong in the spaces we occupy today. “Our presence in most of these spaces is a result of decades of grassroots activism and begrudgingly developed legislation,” Tulshyan and Burey write.
They put forth a powerful idea that feeling like an imposter isn’t an individual failing on the part of women. It’s a systemic challenge of exclusion and bias in the workplace. To that end, the solution lies in fixing systems — not women.
So, where do we start?
At an individual level, this can look like demanding more transparency from your organization. Ask for data on pay and promotion rates across demographics — race, caste, class, sexual orientation, child status, etc. Then, lobby for more equitable resources for everyone.
As a manager, ending imposter syndrome can start by dismantling male-biased social and leadership styles that equate confidence and power with competence. Understand how bias affects people on your team, particularly women from marginalized communities. Finally, speak up and advocate for your people. By working to reduce bias against all women you can help create a space where everyone feels safe and confident to be themselves.
Here's a video I want to share with you this week: Christine vs. Work: The Truth Behind Imposter Syndrome by Christine Liu.
Like what you just read? Our team of global editors shares personal stories, practical advice, and fun stuff from the internet in a weekly version of this newsletter, sign up here!
Empowering business growth through innovation & collaboration, delivering results with agility & grit.
2yBoth the article and newsletter give a proper description of the narrative but yet a study about skills and qualifications as well as results achieved would nail it not to say pin it even more. Yet, there are two concepts contained within the article: the imposter syndrome proven to be a political narrative and the insecure overachiever narative. One coin two sides. Both share the same root belief which represent the undue something call it a promotion or whatever. Unfair? But according to what criteria. Answering this question leads to conformism, corporatism, and ultimately to cognitive biases. If one’s there, that’s for a reason, not out of pure chance and luck. Both rethoric have a point in common: the lack of trust. The baffled imposter’s syndrome relies on organizational lack of trust when the praised insecure overachiever’s relies on individual lack of self-confidence. In both cases, the equilibrium - the sane equilibrium I should say - is disrupted. And both narratives are toxic both at an organization and individual levels. If one looks at the big picture, having such narratives conveyed is an ESG policy concern too. Crossing studies with mental distress at work would be interesting.
Realtor Associate @ Next Trend Realty LLC | HAR REALTOR, IRS Tax Preparer
2ySomething To Think About 🤔.
Mother, Founder, Advocate, Teacher and Student of Life
2yExactly! It’s a result of the systemic discrimination and marginalization that we face as we navigate predominately white, male-dominated lead workplaces and a culture that oppresses women. #hardstop