Improved Access to Free Senior High School
Achieving universal primary and secondary education is a central target of the UN Sustainable Development Goals. Completion of primary and secondary education equips individuals with the needed skills and knowledge to establish businesses, seek employment, and save to secure their futures. Higher levels of education ultimately result in improved intergenerational mobility and sustained poverty reduction.
Ghana continues to face some challenges in this sector, including limited space for increased admission and insufficient infrastructure for senior high school education. In 2017, space constraints resulted in over 60,000, or 15% of Ghana’s students, not being able to enroll in schools across the country, despite passing their Basic Education Certificate Examination to qualify.
The government has made significant advances to improve education levels in the country, including the introduction of the Free Senior High School Policy to tackle challenges posed by financial constraints for students and their families. This policy resulted in increased enrolment in public schools but worsened issues relating to seat or space inadequacy. In response, multi-track year-round education was introduced, splitting the student body into separate tracks with a defined break-period rotation to boost school enrolment without expanding infrastructure.
However, this policy increases maintenance and administrative costs and may even produce a negative effect on students’ academic performance. The government has since committed to building more schools to end the double-track system, raising considerable funds toward the required infrastructure investment.
But there is an alternative solution that shows strong potential to generate important cost savings. Because there is surplus capacity in the private school sector, providing subsidies for children to attend private schools will reduce the need and urgency to construct new schools.
Resources are always limited; even more so at this time of global economic difficulties. Decision-makers need to be cautious when designing policies to ensure any investment made provides the highest possible return for every cedi spent of public funds. Ghana Priorities, a research project between the National Development Planning Commission and award-winning think tank Copenhagen Consensus, set out to provide new data for this discussion. The project had 28 teams of economists studying over 80 policy interventions over the last year across a wide variety of sectors, ranging from education to nutrition and disease prevention, toward finding the most cost-effective solutions for Ghana in terms of both its economic and social impacts.
Three researchers help inform us in the debate on expanding free senior high school education, Dr. Festus Ebo Turkson and Dr. Priscilla Twumasi Baffour of the Department of Economics, University of Ghana together with Dr. Brad Wong from Copenhagen Consensus. They estimate the costs and benefits of offering subsidies to those students who would enroll in private schools through the public placement system.
This involves helping families pay the cost of private secondary education with subsidies, with the target of enrolling 30,000 pupils per year. To keep costs down, the program would only subsidize students who could not secure a spot through the public placement system, which would require an annual transfer to parents of about GH¢ 60 million. However, the investment in private schooling would alleviate the need to build 50 new public schools, saving the government GH¢ 250 million in infrastructure, as well as ongoing costs equal to GH¢ 60 million a year.
This intervention would thus transfer the operating costs of the schooling from the public to the private sector while diverting the fixed costs of new school infrastructure to the future. The researchers calculated the total cost of implementation at nearly GH¢ 500 million over 15 years, and the benefits at over GH¢ 730 million. Providing public subsidy to placement in private schools would thus generate a benefit 1.5 times higher than the original investment.
The potential learning benefits of this intervention would make the return on investment even more significant. Compared with the double-track system, public support may improve the quality of learning to all students enrolled in private schools, as these establishments could use the funds to support more teachers and better classroom inputs. The researchers estimated the potential learning benefits in the form of test scores and future wages for the students to be significant as well, in the order of GH¢ 900 million. This would double the positive effect of the intervention, with every cedi spent on the initiative delivering over three cedis in social benefits.
These results are of crucial importance to help bring down the cost of free senior high schools while educating all qualified students and helping improve social mobility. Providing subsidies for pupils to attend private senior high school is likely to be a better investment than the alternative of building schools alone, especially at the present time. In the context of coronavirus and a global recession, the government is even more pressed than usual to use resources in the smartest way possible, making the savings of GH¢ 250 million in school infrastructure and improved education all the more substantial.
This article was originally published in Ghana's newspaper of record - The Daily Graphic.
Technical Advisor
4yThis is a subject that qualifies as a 'hot potato'. Some issues are not raised when Free Senior secondary school in Ghana is discussed. Some of these are: Where is quality in this discussion? Is universal secondary education interpreted to mean wholesale access to Upper secondary school, when junior secondary school is already compulsory and free? By considering Upper secondary as secondary but not the junior secondary are we suggesting that junior secondary school is still primary education? Can we liken universal secondary education to universal tertiary education? Should every child be sponsored by the state when some parents can afford the fees for their wards and more? These fundamental questions are not considered when a populist universal secondary education is advocated. I share the alternative presented by the researchers. This is where true equity becomes evident and the poorest of the poor receive the assistance they need to participate in secondary education. At present, the inability of private providers of secondary education to fully participate in the free senior high school is a serious breach of the rights of the children who for lack of space are unable to attend public senior high schools when there are places in private schools. A policy promoted ostensibly on the perception that it amounts to using public resources to the private sector. Then it begs the question, why can't the private sector be considered the engine of growth in education in the same way the private sector is perceived in the Economy? This is difficult to correlate especially when the Constitutional provision that allows private sector participation is very clear and the students would be accessing their entitlement to education as provided under the same Constitution. Rightly there should be a re-thinking about all the angles and sides when universal secondary education is considered. The discussion is still on-going. Kudos to the Researchers for introducing a new dimension to this 'hot potato' in Ghana.