The Investment Implications of the Oil Slide
Subscribe to the Notes on the Week Ahead newsletter to receive it directly in your inbox and access Market Insights on Amazon Alexa & Google Home.
At his press conference on November 2nd, Fed Chairman, Jay Powell opined that the window for a soft landing had narrowed. This was very much in line with his messaging for many months which has emphasized that the Fed regards inflation as being much too high and is willing to put the economy in recession, if necessary, to return it to its 2% target. However, it also underscores the economic problem caused by “supply-shock” inflation: it simultaneously boosts inflation expectations, inducing a more restrictive monetary policy, and drags on economic growth.
Both the economy and financial markets have felt the full impact of supply-shock inflation, and, in particular, oil-shock inflation, in 2022. However, as the year draws to a close, oil prices are tumbling. This actually widens the window for a soft landing and, while we still expect further Fed tightening this week and in early 2023, the oil slide is reducing the risk of either a renewed surge in inflation or deep recession. Because of this, as this blighted year comes to a close, it is worth reviewing why oil prices have fallen recently, what this could mean for inflation, growth and monetary policy in the months ahead, and what it suggests for investor positioning today.
The oil price round trip has been dramatic. According to AAA, the national average price for regular unleaded gasoline this morning is $3.26, down from a peak of $5.02 on June 14th and actually below its $3.33 price of a year ago. Crude oil prices have seen a similar reversal, with a barrel of West Texas Intermediate Crude priced at $70.44 today, compared to $122.11 in early June and $70.86 a year ago.
The reasons for the surge in oil and gasoline prices are well known. Booming economic growth in late 2021, combined with a general global rebound in travel as pandemic effects waned, led to a surge in the demand for gasoline, diesel and jet fuel. Meanwhile, Vladimir Putin’s attack on Ukraine triggered European sanctions and Russian retaliation, reducing the global supply of crude oil and distillate products. This shortage was exacerbated by a decline in U.S. refining capacity and a slowdown in investment in oil and gas drilling during the pandemic.
However, since then, prices have fallen steadily. On the demand side, the global economy has slowed with weakness in Europe, China and the United States all moderating the demand for energy. High energy prices have also induced conservation, with only moderate increases in vehicle miles traveled restraining gasoline demand and higher load factors in the airline industry limiting the demand for jet fuel.
On the supply side, producers have, not surprisingly, increased output in response to high prices. According to Department of Energy estimates, U.S. production of crude oil and other liquid fuels will top 21.1 million barrels per day in 2023, far above the pre-pandemic record high of 19.5 million barrels in 2019. Other non-OPEC nations are also increasing output and, while OPEC agreed to cut member quotas by 2 million barrels a day in October, there was less to this cut than met the eye as most OPEC members were producing below their quotas. Crude oil prices were further undermined by an OPEC+ decision, on December 4th, not to cut output further.
Other factors have helped depress gasoline prices, including a lack of weather disruption to refineries over the summer, significant releases of oil from the Strategic Petroleum Reserve and very high refinery capacity utilization to try to deal with a diesel shortage. With signs of continued global economic weakness, both oil and gasoline prices could see further modest declines in the months ahead.
The surge in energy prices in early 2022 contributed to a spike in inflation. By June, a 42% year-over-year increase in energy prices had pushed the year-over-year increase in CPI to 9.0%, its biggest increase in over 40 years.
This had two very negative economic effects. First, it spooked members of the Federal Reserve, who seem obsessed with the idea that higher actual inflation could result in permanently higher inflation expectations, making it harder to get back to their 2% target. This undoubtedly contributed to a more hawkish path for interest rates, with four consecutive 75 basis points hikes in June, July, September and November. This, in turn, contributed to much higher mortgage rates, pummeling the housing market, and a much higher dollar, undermining U.S. exports.
It also hurt U.S. consumer confidence, with the University of Michigan’s Index of Consumer Sentiment falling to a record low of 50 in June. This is not surprising – the price of a gallon of gasoline is the best known price in America and in the summer of 2022, a nationwide price of over $5 a gallon seemed to confirm that inflation was out of control.
Recommended by LinkedIn
However, much of this can also work in reverse. On Tuesday, the Labor Department will release CPI data for November and we expect to see a 7.3% year-over-year gain, down from 7.8% in October. Moreover, lower gasoline prices over the winter, along with fading inflation elsewhere, could easily cut the headline inflation rate to between 6.5% and 7.0% in December, 4.5% to 5.0% by March and to between 3.0% and 3.5% by this time next year.
Lower energy prices could also help economic growth by bolstering real consumer income, particularly for lower and middle-income households. Even with this, we expect that real consumer spending will grow very slowly at best. However, cheaper oil clearly reduces the risk of a hard landing.
This risk would be further reduced if the Federal Reserve were willing to accept the gift being presented to it by oil markets. While there is little evidence that significantly higher inflation expectations are getting embedded into the economy, the slide in oil prices should alleviate that worry anyway.
This Wednesday, the Federal Reserve will very likely announce a 0.50% increase in the federal funds rate, moderating the pace of increase from the last four meetings. They will also provide new forecasts for the federal funds rate which we expect to imply a total of 0.50% more in rate increases in early 2023, bringing the terminal rate to a range of 4.75% to 5.00%.
This is probably more restraint than the economy needs. The yield curve, as measured by the spread between two-year and ten-year Treasury yields, is at its most inverted since 1981, indicating expectations of both lower inflation and recession. The gap between five-year nominal Treasuries and five-year TIPS, which provides a forecast of CPI inflation rate over the next five years, has fallen from 3.6% at its peak last March to 2.3% today. And futures markets suggest that investors expect the Fed to reverse course, cutting rates later in 2023 and in 2024.
It would be better for the economy if the Fed avoided the mistake of being too tight. However, if they don’t and the economy falls into stagnation or recession, the downturn should be milder because of cheaper oil. Moreover, lower oil prices increase the chances that we will emerge from the rollercoaster of the past few years with a slow-growth but low-inflation economy. This should serve as a solid foundation for good returns for both stocks and bonds after a very difficult 2022.
Disclaimers
Opinions and estimates offered constitute our judgment and are subject to change without notice, as are statements of financial market trends, which are based on current market conditions. The views and strategies described may not be suitable for all investors. Any forecasts contained herein are for illustrative purposes only and are not to be relied upon as advice or interpreted as a recommendation.
Content is intended for institutional/wholesale/professional clients and qualified investors only (not for retail investors) as defined by local laws and regulations. J.P. Morgan Asset Management is the brand for the asset management business of JPMorgan Chase & Co. and its affiliates worldwide (collectively “JPM”).
Opinions and comments may not reflect those of J.P. Morgan or its affiliates. Content is intended for US audience only, and should not be considered a recommendation or endorsement by JPM for any product, service or strategy specific to any individual investor’s needs. JPM is not responsible for third-party posted content. "Likes", "Favorites", shares, similar functionality or content appearing on third party websites should not be considered an endorsement of JPM products or services.”).
and the Fed hasn't looked at input prices, 15 percent tariffs on the bulk of goods imported (from China), and the fact that wages for workers have fallen behind the C suite remuneration of companies for the last 40 years by factors of 100s, and that something needs to move. Yet squeezing the economy, making the wealthy wealthier with higher rates, is somehow going to fix things?
Free Bird
2yThe FED may revise its Inflation target to 3 or 4% instead of 2 (speculation). Do you believe that the employees will get at least a 4% pay raise if that happens? I don't think so. The real wages of the employees will be eroded by the inflation.
Grow Your LinkedIn Marketplace
2yThanks for sharing
Executive Leadership, Global Distribution, Passion for ESG/Sustainability, Priority is Risk Mitigation
2yDavid - have you considered how much impact weather has on commodity prices, oil in particular, and the seasonal trade associated with inventories from October through May when looking at future price forecasts? Even if the data you are quoting is accurate on additional production the excess 2M barrels/day will evaporate quickly in response to demand destruction - whether OPEC or North American shale producers who are already leveraged to the hilt - oil prices IMO are well supported at $80 and will leave pockets of price spike ahead without Russian barrels to balance global markets - new sources of supply do not come on-line quickly enough to offset a war in 9mos with spare production lying around to the fill the gap - Saudi Arabia has real issues with depletion that have been telegraphed for two decades and the US is courting Mexico and Venezuela again to try stimulating output from those regions after long periods of neglect
Senior Manager at Bayat Rayan
2yTraditionally the impact of crude oil prices on inflation and recession has been grossly overestimated. It is easy to presume that the recent inflation is caused by oil prices. The factors of COVID-19 related subsidies and paymnets while there have not been proportionately goods and services made, the overpricing of many electronic devices, the burden of defence expenditures are ignored. Subsequently, effective cure is not applied. The gauge of interest adjusting policies cannot single-handedly improve the economic situation.