IS ISLAM AND MUSLUMANİSM (Müslümanlık) The Same Thing? (Preface)

Preface


The word "Müslümanlık" is used as the name of Islam religion in Turkey exclusively. Also in Iran, there is a name similar to Islam. They call Islam: (Moselmani مسلماني). This name is unknown in the world, and at the same time this word is not found in the Qur'an.


For the reason that I am of Turks origin, I used to hear this naming constantly since childhood. But that did not surprise me, and I had no doubt until I received a rich culture. After that; Intellectual discussions have increased in recent years, and religious conflicts has multiplied, drawing my attention to the confusion of concepts. Because almost every person has started to consider himself qualified and competent in all areas. And this, quickly led to the appearance and spread of chaos in our thoughts and religious beliefs at the level of our society. This phenomenon is what made me think deeply about The latent secret of Musulmanism (Müslümanlık), and the difference between it and Islam.


I started to wonder: what is Islam and what is «Müslümanlık»? What is the difference between these two concepts? But after looking for the hidden side of the religion "Müslümanlık" and have discovered the secrets of those who invented it, I became certain that it is a religion independent of Islam. Then I came back to ask myself: what is the difference between these two religions? Or what are the points of contention between them? İf so, what are these differences? .. Have you thought for a moment about this? Do you know anything about the gap between Islam and the religion that spread in Turkish society under the name of Müslümanlık? If you do not know this difference yet, please wait, you will get details on this difference in the following sections, you will learn the secrets of this false religion in the near future.


Millions of people have confused these two concepts for centuries. how about that! Some facts may remain unknown for a long time. But any social event Can not remain anonymous forever. Even if it was deliberately concealed, it would surely be seen someday.


It is definite that the problem of "Müslümanlık" Has been hidden for centuries to the present day. indeed, many facts have been distorted for centuries and cannot be highlighted in the present circumstances. As well, the word (Müslümanlık) was fabricated as a secret project after the occupation of Turkestan by the Umayyad armies of Turkish cities as a reaction to the occupiers ... (The details of this topic will be explained in the future). It seems that those who prepared this plan used the word "Mülümanlık" as the title of the Islamic religion 800 years ago ... This name has been deliberately attributed to the Islamic religion. Thus, the event began under mysterious circumstances. It is most likely that this project was manufactured under the name "Müslümanlık" on this basis.


But who are those who invented this concept to distort the Islamic religion? And how were they allowed to do it? Because giving a false name to Islam (that day) was not an easy task. Above all, the intrusion of a person into such an adventure at this historical stage was a matter of daring. We believe that the leaders of the Islamic State did not allow anyone to commit such a violation at the time. Maybe we are wrong (in this hypothesis). Because the community may have faced terrible problems at that time. Wars, rebellions and power struggles, repeated over time, left no room for the state to prevent the destruction of values. So maybe the officials were unaware of plots and malicious plans.


Some researchers have studied this religion in recent years. They approached this problem with great care, Without going into its details. They may have some reservations fearing to be hurt if they revealed the secrets of this counterfeit religion that their predecessors had pretended it, to strike Islam from his heart.


Professor Ahmet Yaşar Ocak is the only example that has highlighted for the first time the difference between Islam and Musulmanism (Müslümanlık) with scientific style. Nobody before him has ever differentiated these two concepts as far as we know. But this Turkish academic touched on the subject most briefly as if he was afraid because of his anxiety. He tried to summarize the difference between these two concepts in a few lines in one of his books, but without going into detail.


İt is possible to understand this avoidance for two reasons: The first; this personality is Turkish. So he avoids opening the door to doubt and discussion so that some do not say that it is the Turks who made this false name of Islam. The second reason is that the word «Müslümanlık» has been used for centuries as a name for Islam and it was rooted in Turkish culture and penetrated deeply into their consciousness. Therefore, this error can not be corrected after today, and finaly deepening this topic will not solve the problem. Ahmet Yasar Ocak, may have thought so. This makes us understand why the author has stopped disclosing and the statement and kept hiding the secrets.


To understand and appreciate the seriousness of this problem, it is enough to read the news of the attacks on Professor Muhammad Aydin during his academic speech on «Müslümanlık» at one of the conferences. In particular, it is very dangerous for a researcher to explain the concept of religion in a scientific way in Turkey. An expression of Professor Ahmed Yashar Ocak at the beginning of his book «Türkiye Sosyal Tarihinde İslam'ın Macerası» proves this fact. The author says what it means in English: “Anyone who touches on the issue of Islam in Turkey and its social history, such as if he tampering with the beehive”. So, despite all the optimism, I have prepared this book with the expectation of being a victim of danger at any moment but I do not know where this danger will come from!


This study is based on documents and evidence. We have compiled many articles that we have recently written. So the book was thus formed of its sum. Every article in this book is independent and has a unity in itself. However, these materials also complement each other. This provides the integrity and unity of the book.


This book deals with the phenomenon of religion and the way in which Turkish society perceives it at the same time. examines the point of view of Turkish society, in particular on the religious level, and on this occasion draws attention to the changes in the concept of Islam throughout the history of the Turkish nation. This study attempts to give the correct answers to the following questions:


1) How do people understand the concept of religion in Turkey?


2) The people's understanding of the concept of religion in Turkey, does agree with the rules of Islam, or to what extent does it agree?


3) How religious and Sufi entities arose in Turkey (or how Sufi and sectarian currents arose), and what is the correct information about the historical stages of the emergence and development of these currents.


4) When and why Islam was converted to Musulmanism (Müslümanlık)


This study provides important and detailed information when looking for answers to these four questions. There are details within this extremely exciting information, which most scientists and researchers have overlooked over the centuries, and this aspect of the study is the biggest cause of surprise and wonder.


I certainly know that I am putting myself at risk when I prepare this book (as I mentioned earlier). But I must make it clear that whenever I came across of secret information that there are things are useful to people and will dispel evil, I thought that hide it and silence is a betrayal and pain in my neck..


Trying to publish this book in Turkey (under the current circumstances) might not be safe, and I think that if it is published on the Internet, it can provoke Muslumans extremists who hate Muslims for a long time. Do not forget that I live in this country! But I will try to spread it, God willing, through this network.


On this occasion, I will not deny that violence, injustice, extremism, racism, exploitation, and superstition are very common in today's world, but there are righteous and good tongues and pens that support truth and realism. And I - no doubt - hope that these righteous and good pens will help me. In fact, there are countries that have policies that support freedom and justice and respect human rights. Institutions and associations in these countries are making efforts to spread virtues, sciences and lofty values. I would like these countries, institutions, and societies to recognize the difficulties I have suffered for 40 years. Yes, I succeeded in revealing some facts that the secret organizations had hidden under the direction of the state itself. I want free countries and institutions to help me and save me from this dark environment that surrounded me 40 years ago, especially in supporting me in the fight against mystical mythology and superstitions.


The events that have occurred in fact and have been seized with evidence and documents are often not kept secret forever. But the pursuit of secret plans for the detection its bad consequences is not an easy task, but there is a threat to the life of the researcher, however. The disclosure of conspiracies and And to reveal its serious consequences of good faith is an honor for the researcher, but at the same time is a matter of faith and ethics. Even if this is a danger to which the researcher may be exposed.


A very important question; is Islam and Musulmanism (Müslümanlık) are the same things?! Absolutely no! But very Interesting that this question, even though it is extremely important, no one in Turkey answers it, and nobody wants to do any research to answer it! Because there are incredible secrets to answer this question; and because there are hidden concepts. Their disclosure requires first a thorough knowledge, also requires audacity; Even if you have both of these characteristics, it is unlikely that you will venture into revealing a dangerous secret that a gang has tried to hide it for centuries. That's if it causes the uprising of the entire Turkish people.


In fact, some academics have recently realized that these two concepts are different from each other. Some have addressed the subject with only a few words, (such as Prof. Dr. Ali Bardakoglu), and others with several lines (like Prof. Dr. Ahmed Yashar Ojak). But this whisper is not enough to show the truth. Moreover, there is a big gap between my view and the view of these two personalities aboute the difference between Islam and Musulmanism (Müslümanlık). This gap can not be covered by a few lines or even a few articles.


When I was studying the Sufi movement known as Naqshbandi in the 1990s, I realized during the research that some secret gangs in Iraq, Turkistan, and India had distorted Islam widely throughout history. This has drawn my attention to the historical events of religious, mystical and sectarian movements. The information I received during my study of the subject showed that it indicates terrible facts in which I can not remain silent or feel relieved not to have announced it.


I collected the documents and information I found over 30 years; In order to spread the truth and make people accept it, I wanted to share it with those who care about these secrets. Thus found this book which is now in your hands. But what you read in this book is just a small picture of the iceberg, or a drop of the sea as they say. I hope this book is a convincing document in the hands of advocates of honesty and truth. «No, We hurl truth at falsehood, and it shall conquer it, and see, falsehood vanishes. Woe to you for all you have described.» (Holy Qoran; al-Anbiya/18)


Hopefully that this study, which aims to reduce the effects of myths and it calls for the dissemination of correct information, is useful to all.


Feriduddin AYDIN      


To view or add a comment, sign in

Insights from the community

Others also viewed

Explore topics