It's Baaack!

It's Baaack!

Here we are again: The United States has once again hit the debt ceiling, and the government can no longer issue any new debt unless and until Congress acts to raise the ceiling. 

A number of years ago I wrote an Op-Ed for The New York Times, excoriating Texas Senator Ted Cruz for reading Dr. Seuss's Green Eggs and Ham for 21 hours on the floor of the U.S. Senate holding the debt ceiling hostage to his unrelated cause du jour... rolling back Obamacare. 

This fall, as the U.S. Treasury runs out of tricks to keep our federal fiscal machinery running, we will no doubt see Congress once again play chicken with our country's full faith credit. 

As my colleague, Strategas' Dan Clifton recently wrote, "Republicans have little appetite to raise the debt ceiling... making it clear they are not willing to vote for a straight debt ceiling increase given the Democrats are moving $6 trillion of spending under the budget reconciliation process."

Warren Buffett has aptly termed the debt ceiling a "political weapon of mass destruction." A default by the United States on its outstanding public indebtedness would have incalculable consequences for the global financial system and would permanently impair the dollar's status as the world's reserve currency. Treasury Secretary Janet Yellen warned of "irreparable harm to the U.S. economy and the livelihoods of all Americans" if Congress does not act on the debt limit. 

Yet, ironically, voting not to increase the debt ceiling is one of the few levers members of Congress have, be they Republicans or moderate Democrats, to prevent an equally serious act of fiscal irresponsibility – namely, spending another $4 trillion on childcare, eldercare, housing, education, paid leave, pre-Kindergarten programs, health insurance, nutrition and other social priorities. Which, if enacted, would come on top of the following spending bills:

  • $550 billion in new spending in the much-discussed bipartisan infrastructure bill which was just passed by the Senate and is awaiting consideration by the House of Representatives. 
  • the $1.9 trillion American Rescue Plan passed earlier this year; 
  • the $2 trillion COVID-19 relief CARES Act and the $500 billion Paycheck Protection Program.

All of which piles onto outstanding debt (both that held by the public and intergovernmental holdings) of over $28 trillion. The United States now owes others more than 126% of its gross domestic product. 100% is considered the threshold for avoiding a "debt spiral."

What will it take before our elected officials recognize there is, in fact, a limit to what we as a society can afford to spend – and that we are way, way past that point? Are we even capable of navigating between the Scylla of default and the Charybdis of excessive spending?

In my 2012 book Stewardship, I wrote about the Great Financial crisis as a preview – a case study in what happens when we fail to live up to our stewardship responsibilities. I warned that similar stewardship failures were showing up in our failure to responsibly manage the finances of our country. 

The sequel to that frightening film is playing out now. As I said in 2012, the consequences could well make the last financial crisis look like child's play. 

Thomas Gates

Retired early at RBC Wealth Management

3y

John Coltrane, Grumpy Economist, recently wrote about the Fed issuing Perpetuals and even converting outstanding debt into Perpetuals. Debt problem solved and no further need for debt ceiling.

Like
Reply
Paul E Westphal, CIMA®

Senior Vice President – Financial Advisor, Consulting Group at RBC Wealth Management

3y

When one looks at our national debt, we must also look at our assets……a balance sheet view. Janet Yellen has more recently been quoted that we are more than able to handle our current debt load, especially at prevailing interest rates. At the same time she does not believe in MMT. Context is important, namely recovery form the Great Financial recession/depression and of course the global Pandemic. Default is not an option, a bipartisan compromise should be the call to action. Have faith in what is the great society, America

To view or add a comment, sign in

More articles by John Taft

  • My Advice for the New SEC Chair

    My Advice for the New SEC Chair

    With his nomination of Paul Atkins to succeed Gary Gensler as Chair of the U.S.

    2 Comments
  • Let It Burn?

    Let It Burn?

    Why Aren’t We Talking About the National Debt? One of my favorite scenes in 1996’s hit movie That Thing You Do! is when…

    6 Comments
  • "Arbitrary and Capricious"

    "Arbitrary and Capricious"

    The past year hasn’t been kind to financial market regulators – several high-profile court decisions have set them back…

    1 Comment
  • Is More Always Better?

    Is More Always Better?

    In his most recent book, When More Is Not Better: Overcoming America’s Obsession With Economic Efficiency, Roger Martin…

    5 Comments
  • Can Divestiture Bring About Change?

    Can Divestiture Bring About Change?

    Not long ago, I wrote about the “ESG boo birds” who disapprove of the idea that fiduciaries and asset managers can be…

    2 Comments
  • Succession Planning Is a Fiduciary Responsibility

    Succession Planning Is a Fiduciary Responsibility

    Financial advisors: You owe it to your clients to ensure they’re cared for long after you retire. When a financial…

    5 Comments
  • Market Capitalism: Flawed and Imperfect, but Better Than Any Alternative

    Market Capitalism: Flawed and Imperfect, but Better Than Any Alternative

    I will be speaking at the Center for the Study of Capitalism at Wake Forest University’s Business Summit, the theme for…

    3 Comments
  • My Conversation With Steve Booth

    My Conversation With Steve Booth

    At SIFMA’s 2023 Annual Meeting, I had the opportunity to sit down with my colleague Steve Booth, Chairman & CEO of…

    4 Comments
  • Investing in Resilience: How Municipal Bonds Can Fund Climate Adaptation

    Investing in Resilience: How Municipal Bonds Can Fund Climate Adaptation

    Get used to the phrase “climate adaptation” – you’ll be seeing it a lot very soon. And as so often is the case with…

    1 Comment
  • Cui Bono From Financial Regulation?

    Cui Bono From Financial Regulation?

    In 125 BC, Roman politician and prosecutor Lucius Cassius introduced the legal principle of cui bono, which roughly…

    1 Comment

Insights from the community

Others also viewed

Explore topics