It's time to change change!
How ready is your business or organisation for the implementation and delivery of successful change? That change may be created due to a new process, redundancies, digital transformation, new office desks, a new CEO or apprentice, a new marketing strategy, a breakdown in a relationship, an external factor. There are so many factors that drive change. We must not forget that there can also be so many personal changes all co-existing at any one time in an individuals life, each taking up time and energy.
Change may be well-intentioned, justifiable and necessary to move an organisation forward but how much time is invested on people, be it during pre-change, during change and post change in order to ensure that it is successful and sustainable. On paper that process of change may be well planned with a fantastic strategy and project management, all forensically put in place but how are the people involved going to react when introduced and exposed to that plan? And, when I say "involved" I mean those who will experience the change as well as those who's role it is to deliver that change, including the project team and stakeholders.
In essence what is the initial condition sensitivity (ICS) of those involved?
Just a few of the unseen anomalies that can so easily derail any well intentioned change management project but if they remain unspoken potentially create festering flaws in the project, increasing the likelihood of failure rather than success. Like owning a beautiful diamond which has a fine flaw running through it, not visible to the naked eye and only visible under a powerful microscope. We increase risk and the balance of success tips towards failure, or certainly not achieving the change that was eagerly anticipated.
Using an aviation analogy,
"taking off may appear to be quite straightforward but how straightforward will the landing be if we haven't carried out the proper checks, checked the weather or put the right crew together?".
We need to better understand the human factor.
At the very start of any change management project time is required (invested) to know who is involved, and by who I mean everyone. If there was any moment during a project where "slowing down to speed up" is vitally important then it is at this key stage. Projects require insight and context behind each and every person involved and that has to come from a deeper place and perspective other than visual behavioural (which we have become overly reliant on). We need to go into the unseen rather than the seen.
It is also at this important juncture, pre-change, that hearts and minds are won or lost and that equates to engagement or disengagement, success or failure.
So, how do we get that required level of insight that aids success?
Recommended by LinkedIn
We start by understanding and appreciating the experiences that each and every person is going through at that moment in time. This forms the baseline from which to monitor any future changes experienced by each person. A fluid complexity risk matrix. Yes, each person is totally unique and they will inevitably have different feedback loops (graphic below) acting upon them, exerting different priorities on their time and energy. Only by understanding each person will we truly appreciate that overall organisational picture. This unique set of data provides us with a continual fluid insight as change inevitably occurs to each person involved at different moments across the life of a project.
It is this vital data that can aid decision makers decide upon whether the project is a "go" or "no go". If it is a "no go" then what ground work or interventions need adopting to get the project to the starting line with everyone aligned with a shared awareness? It is that shared awareness that will aid everyone's wellbeing and help build important relationships throughout the life of the project.
If the decision is to "go" people can still be monitored for changes (positive and negative), keeping people and the project on track whilst measuring the degree of success being experienced by those who change was implemented to assist.
If we obtain better data then we can also get ahead of any future danger, becoming proactive to issues before they are potentially exhibited in negative or maladaptive behaviours. This is the beauty of having a fluid complexity risk matrix.
By gaining this vital insight we also change the whole change curve concept as we can now prevent anxiety, fear, denial and most importantly depression and burn out. In essence we bypass the negative issues associated with change. The blue line on the graphic below is the new positive curve, only possible if we gain that insight prior to a change project commencing.
It really is time to change change...
PhD | CoLeadership Automation | Structuring & Scaling the Facilitation of the MetaConversation with each: about moving the whole forward and seeing all things and people in their full potency and potential |
1yNot sure whether the empathetic approach is enough to change change: "We start by understanding and appreciating the experiences that each and every person is going through at that moment in time." Aren't we all doing the empathetic trick these days? Where we go we use ongoing change as a platform and lever for even better and more change (now that is changing change at their end too ;-)), we start with the "inverse empathetic approach": taking a step back, respectfully ignoring the proposed or planned change and change objectives, and simply re-defining together with each and people - and re-engaging them around - what we all could understand as an excellent organization (as an opportunity). To then promise them that if they take only 10% of that better excellence behavior, we do the other 90% with other people. Change as an individual mass-transactional exchange deal. And only then we return to the planned change which will show to be self-evident, if not redundant to achieve the objectives of that change in different ways.
Author of "Speak Up, Listen Down". Redefining and unlocking the power of the human factor.
1yJunior Schoeman Colin Mobey Professor Julie Hodges Julie Geens Gail Atkins FCIPD Fraser Gault Graham Wilson