It's time to talk about ageism
Viktor Aheiev

It's time to talk about ageism

If you’ve been following this newsletter for the past two years, you know that I’m fixated on why it’s urgent to get more women into corporate leadership and what we need to do to break down the barriers blocking us from gender equity in the highest ranks

That’s why I’m turning my focus to ageism. 

Unlike sexism, racism, antisemitism, homophobia—you name it—ageism is still widely accepted in today’s business culture. The bias against older people in senior-level roles is one of the last tolerated—or most justified—forms of discrimination.

And while ageism certainly does not impact women alone, it hits us a whole lot harder — and in different ways — than our male counterparts. For women, it’s a double whammy; there never seems to be a time when we are on equal footing in the workplace with men. When women are young, we are seen as too young, even as our male counterparts of the same age are considered to be in their prime. As we start families, the well-documented Motherhood Penalty — a decline in pay when women become mothers — kicks in. By contrast, men often get promoted when they start families. Culturally, men are seen as being more responsible when they become dads and that translates to salary and title. By our 50s, unless a woman has already made it to the top, she is likely to be seen as “past her prime,” even as middle-aged men are deemed experienced and accomplished. (I realize ageism also negatively impacts men and I will be tackling that topic in this newsletter, too.) 

As I have pointed out before, so many of the ways society measures success are antiquated. The rules were written long ago, before women made up more than 50% of the workforce and when most senior executives had wives at home who took care of the kids — and everything else on the domestic front — so they could focus exclusively on succeeding at work. Now that more than 60% of married couples are dual income households, we need to change those rules. We need to shift our way of thinking so that women don’t feel they’re always off track. Women can’t prove value and rack up accomplishments on metrics that don’t align with how we live and work today. Part of getting more women to the top is embracing a different work trajectory for what it is: Different. Not less ambitious. Not less committed. Not less innovative. Not less dependable. 

This starts with acknowledging that the gender divide in the workplace begins when people start families; the data make this clear. I’m not suggesting that people stop having children. Far from it. I am suggesting that we get more honest about what it means to have a family and a career, so that we can break free from gender stereotypes of who does what when. That will liberate women and men from outdated norms that impede progress and perpetuate many biases, including ageism. 

As a recruiter at Russell Reynolds Associates , our job is helping corporations and their boards assemble world-class, highly capable, and diverse teams, because we know diversity is key to strength. Diversity of age has to be part of this, and it’s time to recognize that. 

Every month, I’ll be delving into the different ways that ageism impacts the workplace by highlighting leading voices and research in this topic. I welcome your input and insights, too. Can you share a story about how your career, or the career of someone you know, has been affected by ageism? If you don’t want to comment publicly, please feel free to message me directly. As always, we are in this together. #tothetop

Melanie Villapando

Global Head of Talent Acquisition & Attraction | VP Talent Acquisition | Sr. Director Talent Acquisition | Talent Partner | Talent Consultant | Technology Stack Leader | HR Data Analytics & Research

8mo

So well said and happy to see this discussion brought forward. As a recruiter and TA leader, I’ve heard all kinds of thinly veiled comments about candidates that were really ageism… “no runway” “no energy” “not tech savvy or flexible” etc. Such broad strokes of assessment for categorized candidate groups is the opposite of smart hiring as well as not embracing diversity and new ways of perspective. As a candidate, I was interviewed in the last month with so many personal questions, including did I have children and what was the age of the oldest. I thought TA professionals at least had moved passed this kind of thing but apparently not. There remains plenty of room for awareness in this area. Thank you for the article and series Jenna Fisher

Laura Weil

Board Member @ Carnival Corp | Audit Chair, Finance Expert, M&A, Compliance, Compensation

8mo

Thank you, Jenna. Ageism definitely exists in retailing. I have seen a number of talented, creative women not even interviewed because of their age. There is a belief that only younger executives can understand a younger customer, which I disagree with. It’s a difficult issue because it involves perception and stereotypes. Thanks for tackling the subject.

Tami Seal

Retail Account Operations Leadership | Order to Cash Process Optimization | Strategy & Innovation

9mo

Thanks Jenna. I’m feeling validated by your post. I’ve been searching for a new job for over a year and even when my experience matches the job description to a T, I get passed over with the polite “great experience, but we’re going with other candidates.”. It is common practice to make sure that dates are removed from resumes, and job history isn’t showing more than about 15 years so your age doesn’t stand out. This seems ridiculous when we are often working well into our sixties…

Looking forward to reading your articles on the ‘no one wants to talk about’ topic. Thanks!!!

Deborah Dols

Sustainability Recruitment Client Director Americas at ACRE, Built Environment

9mo

I’m looking forward to reading this evolving conversation. Such an important topic, and often search professionals perpetuate ageism without properly informing their clients of the risks of ageism, and the responsibility and opportunities available to them with experienced hires. In my late 40’s - early 50’s I experienced horrible ageism in the real estate industry in SF after 20 years of senior experience at top firms. I’d taken 4 years away to parent and consult part time and suddenly couldn’t get past the first interview after having my choice of companies before. I was told that I didn’t understand new tech which was ridiculous! I completely changed careers and although ageism was a bit of a factor initially because I had to start nearly from the bottom as a recruiter, it wasn’t a factor eventually because search is a very performance based profession and I found my wisdom and experience to be an advantage as my C-level clients and senior candidates trusted me more. I have more insight, candor, connections, care, and moxie than people are used to. 11 years doing exec search I’m so happy (and successful) today in my profession at the age of almost 62. Mentoring the younger generation at my company is a pleasure and honor.

To view or add a comment, sign in

Insights from the community

Others also viewed

Explore topics