The limits of data visualization for the Finance Function
Imagey our-team on www.freepik.com

The limits of data visualization for the Finance Function

This is the channel "Trends in Finance and Accounting" with 135,000+ subscribers! Click "Subscribe" to receive a notification and an e-mail when I publish new articles on this channel every Thursday and the occasional Saturday.

No alt text provided for this image
The latest episode with special guest, Rose Punkunus

Join my LinkedIn Audio show "The #FinanceMaster Show" today at 13:00 CET. We will be discussing today's article and taking questions from the readers/listeners. You can sign up for and attend the event here.

To follow my entrepreneurial journey you can over to my Instagram account.

If you want shorter snippets of the future of finance and accounting then check out my Twitter account.

Do you want to get notified whenever I post on LinkedIn? Then go to my profile and click the small bell icon below the front page banner on the right-hand side.

Data visualization (or data viz) has been one of the defining developments in the last couple of decades of the Finance Function.

While data visualization is certainly not a new discipline (consider, for example, the groundbreaking work in this field carried out by W E B Du Bois as early as 1900, and that still looks extraordinarily modern today), it is indisputable that its use has become more widespread.

Indeed, today even the smallest businesses rely on data visualization techniques in one way or another. From multinationals right down to owner-operator shopkeepers, charts and graphs are part of the daily life of business, whether they're generated by bespoke in-house tools or commercial bookkeeping software.

Too much of a good thing?

Data viz is popular because it's useful. Hard numbers are not easy to parse for the average non-specialist stakeholder, and visualization makes it easier for these individuals to understand and derive value from data.

Well-designed data viz practices can be game-changing, and their impact is not in question. Visualizations form the basis of what we might call the 'dashboard revolution', which has brought the power of data within reach of individuals and functions that were previously completely divorced from it.

Data viz is also at the heart of the leading business intelligence tools used across industry and is a must-have for bespoke solutions. There's a high likelihood that your organization places a premium on the availability of high-quality data viz. The reason for this is simple: it helps people understand what's going on.

But data practices are developing and, while the dashboard revolution is certainly not over, it is reaching an inflection point. We are now deluged not only by data but by data viz. We are reaching the limits of data visualization as a tool.

Quality, not quantity

Any tool is only as good as the work that it facilitates. Or, to put it another way, we should judge the tools we use and the processes we implement not by their capabilities but by the value-creation they enable. Judged on these terms, it's clear that data viz is just one piece of a much larger puzzle.

Finance professionals are concerned with supporting and enabling better decision-making and better real-world outcomes for their organizations. There are many circumstances in which data viz helps with this.

But, just as pages of numbers are overwhelming for non-specialist stakeholders, so too are pages of charts and graphs. Given the importance of reporting for the average Finance Function, it's vital that we think about how we are presenting information - and we must recognize that the best way to do this will always be context-specific.

In practice, for many Finance Functions, this is likely to mean a scaling back of their reliance on traditional data viz practices. In the average report aimed at C-suite stakeholders, we might use high-quality visualizations for perhaps three or four fundamental KPIs, in order to provide a top-line view that can be easily read and understood. Beyond that, while visualizations still have a role to play, they are not the only game in town. Instead, we should be thinking about new and more efficient ways to deliver information to different stakeholders and functions, mindful of the fact that their needs and expertise will vary.

The ultimate goal, as I've explored previously, is a self-service model augmented by the expertise of a business partner. In this model, every stakeholder would have access to the data they need, in a useful and comprehensible format, on demand. This would be supported by business partners, who can help stakeholders derive insight from that data and enable better outcomes through their cross-functional, interdisciplinary knowledge.

Want to know more? Read the previous article in this series for a new view on data collection and delivery, and subscribe to my newsletter for the latest in Finance and Data & Analytics.

This was the fourth article in my latest series about the "Data to impact journey" You can read previous article(s) in the series below.

From data to impact - the Holy Grail of Finance

The power of harnessing data for Finance

What cleaners and finance professionals have in common

While you await future articles why not read my previous series on Data & Analytics below?

Finance and Data & Analytics - better together

Does your company need a Data & Analytics team?

Can a finance professional "do" Data & Analytics?

Why Data & Analytics always wins

The case for Finance "owning" Data & Analytics

Why Data & Analytics struggle with the "last mile" of impact

Let's end the war between Finance and Data & Analytics

How to create value with Data & Analytics

Continue reading below for more articles about how trends in finance and accounting.

ESG is the only game in town

Like PB&J - why Finance and coding are made for each other

Why The Digital Revolution Hasn’t Caught Onto Finance Yet

Tech vs. People. Where Should Finance Invest?

A Digital Reality Check Of The Finance Function

How To Make Robots A Part Of The Finance Family?

Why You Should Only Robotize Standard Processes 

Robots and Humans. A Marriage Made In Heaven Or Hell?

A Tale Of Robots: From Assembly Lines To Knowledge Workers

Robots Must Solve Business Pains To Be Successful

What AI Competencies Do Your Finance Team Really Need?

Here's How To Test If Your AI Solution Will Be A Success

You're The User Of AI. Yes You, So Take Charge!

Blip. Blop. Accounting Robot. Are You Ready?

Are You Ready For Robotics Process Automation?

Have You Met Your Robot Accountant Yet?

Robots Are The Future Of Analytics

Your Robot Accountant Has A Name, It's Dixie

Anders Liu-Lindberg is the co-founder and a partner at the Business Partnering Institute and the owner of the largest group dedicated to Finance Business Partnering on LinkedIn with more than 10,000 members. I have ten years of experience as a business partner at the global transport and logistics company Maersk. I am the co-author of the book “Create Value as a Finance Business Partner” and a long-time Finance Blogger on LinkedIn with 115,000+ followers and 195,000+ subscribers to my blog. I am also an advisory board member at Born Capital where I help identify and grow the next big thing in #CFOTech. Finally, I'm a member of the board of directors at PACE - Profitability Analytics Center of Excellence where I support the development of new analytics frameworks that can improve profitability in companies around the world.

Alexander Laureti

Director - LMS Advisory, Advising SME's on Growth, Strategic Planning, Maximising Profit & Cashflow. Financial enabler. AI/Tech enthusiast | LMS | KeepMyBooks | WihseFP |Cerebiz |

2y

The dashboard should be like shining a spotlight on the key metrics you are tracking, with some helpful peripheral data if its not distracting. Ideally whatever you can fit on a single-page view. Great article, 100% agree its Quality not Quantity Anders Liu-Lindberg

Ryan Donaghy

Advance Your Finance/Data Career 📊 with English Communication Skills 📈 | Specialist English Communication Skills Coach

2y

Data visualisation is very helpful in supporting our recommendations without needing a magnifying glass or a degree in accounting. But I agree that it has limitations, Anders, namely the human attention span. The fact that it's easy to present can delude us into thinking that we have space to include more metrics — at this point we reach a trade-off (of information over influence).

Adam Shilton

Follow for proven systems to help you automate away burnout and reclaim your freedom | Digital systems architect to SME leaders and Entrepreneurs | TEDx Speaker

2y

What do you see as the main limiting factor Anders?

To view or add a comment, sign in

Insights from the community

Others also viewed

Explore topics