LinkedIn's algorithm tweak has reduced reach by 66%. What can you do about it?
You may be aware that, earlier this year, LinkedIn tweaked their algorithm. This change has reportedly reduced post reach by an average of 66%. So, why has this happened, how does it affect you, and what you can do about it?
How has the LinkedIn algorithm changed?
Before we dive into solutions, it’s worth saying, LinkedIn’s objective is entirely sensible. They want to prioritise business content over the thousands of overtly personal posts which have proliferated since the pandemic. Most LinkedIn users agree with them: personal posts can be jarring on the platform.
Since the algorithm change, posts from people that LinkedIn considers to be ‘experts’, as well as those from a user’s 1st degree connections have been prioritised. With this change, LinkedIn is showing us the content they think we’re most likely to want to see.
Alongside this 3rd party and ‘viral’ posts have become less visible 👇. LinkedIn believes these posts are less targeted, less business-related and less likely to provide real value (other than feeding curiosity).
The platform has also elevated posts 👆 that offer different perspectives or opinions, as well as those that attract ‘meaningful’ comments (i.e. not just: “great post”). These qualities are, again, associated with providing value.
How are these changes affecting reach and engagement?
These changes look to be having a significant impact on who gets to see our content. According to data recently published by LinkedIn analyst, Richard van der Blom , YoY figures show large drops in reach and engagement to October 2023:
To put this into context: up until January 2023, reach had increased 17% YoY and engagement was up 22%. The algorithm tweak looks to have triggered a dramatic reversal of this trend.
Recommended by LinkedIn
It’s actually difficult to comprehend how reach can be “lost” on LinkedIn, when in normal circumstances, if one post isn’t displayed, another will take its place – and its reach. What seems to be happening is that LinkedIn is showing prioritised content to relevant people more frequently, so reach is down, but impressions stays the same, or even increases.
But, regardless of geeky analysis, things have changed and everyone posting to LinkedIn needs to be aware of the new rules of posting.
How can you ride the new LinkedIn algorithm?
OST's updated advice for driving organic reach and engagement on LinkedIn is threefold, and this applies equally to personal and corporate posts:
My previous advice also still applies…
Ultimately, LinkedIn’s algorithm change should be a positive step for the platform and it’s users. We just need to play to the new rules and adjust our strategies accordingly.
Have you noticed any impact on your LinkedIn usage? Any extra tips to add?
Recruiter @ Pick A Job | Connecting exceptional talent with premier opportunities while delivering effective solutions.
6moJudith Ngene
Breathwork Practitioner, Divinator, and Muse
9moI don't get any reach at all on LinkedIn. It's like posting to a ghost town. Other platforms feel the same. These platforms have been monetized to death. It's not about the user experience anymore, it's about getting users to pay for ads. What we're seeing on social media is a microcosm of what's happening across the board in the economy. A few giant corporations now control most everything and are colluding to force prices up without any care for the consumer. Where does this all end? What happens when the prices of everything are so high, that the average consumer can't afford anything? Have the executives at the top even stopped to bother to ask? Nope, gotta get those profits up for next quarter!
Global Digital Marketing | B2B Marketing | Product Marketing | Software | GradDipDigMkt
9moAre you also experience lower reach, impressions and clicks on paid linkedin advertising?
Director and Founder of HX5 Encrypted, Elland Business Hub and Up North Runway
9moLot's of nice comments affirming what you say. I also think that if you advertise they 'tweak' the sharing of your non-advert posts. Controversial but what a way to get you to spend money on the platform. In late '21 I posted about the PM in the BVI getting arrested for money laundering (I work in anti-money laundering and have over 7,000 followers/1st degree contacts). It went viral. I came off linkedin for about a year and then started posting again. I then covered his trial and sentence in Miami. Zilch. Now this is odd because who in the anti-money laundering industry wouldn't find the fact that one of the offshore tax havens top politicians got convicted of money laundering??? If that isn't on topic and highly relevant I don't know what is. I actually think these changes will drive people off linkedin. Most people post because they're sharing. Linkedin i splaying a dangerous game not sharing that content to even 1st degree contacts. Because, why put the effort in if you're getting nothing back? So rather than encourage 'better content' which is highly subjective, why not just recognise if someone has connected to another, then they must be at the very least interested in what they have to say.
Chief Marketing Officer | Console & Mobile Gaming Leader | User Acquisition & Growth Specialist | Digital Marketing Strategist
10moChanges in the LinkedIn algorithm are shaping the platform for the better. Adapting to prioritise valuable content will be key. Nicely summarised and put the findings together. Thanks