London calling: Expertly Separated
Dandara South East Ltd v Medway Preservation Ltd [2024]
Background
The matter concerned a contract for the sale of land which contained a condition precedent for certain earthworks to be carried out. The Claimant terminated the contract, alleging that the condition precedent had not been met, and commenced court proceedings to reclaim its deposit.
The Defendant sought a stay of proceedings on the basis that the contract contained an expert determination clause. The Claimant's response was that, since the contract had been terminated, this provision no longer applied and that it was not separable from the contract.
The key provisions were as follows:
Decision
Recommended by LinkedIn
The English High Court considered the expert determination clause to be a "one-stop shop" requiring all disputes to be subject to expert determination. It held that the expert determination clause was separable from the underlying contract and so unaffected by termination. Its view was that the seeming conflict between Clause 28 and Clause 31 was resolved by interpreting Clause 31 as remaining applicable to disputes over a party's failure to comply with Clause 28.
Comments
This matter involved a close analysis of the contractual language by the Court. The contract was unusual in that expert determination clauses are typically drafted to apply only to certain types of dispute. Nevertheless, the case establishes that the principle of separability will apply to expert determination clauses and that they will not be affected by termination of the contract.
Dandara South East Ltd v Medway Preservation Ltd [2024] EWHC 2318 (Ch)
Kind regards
Stephanie Morton / Brian Perrott
Senior Associate / Partner