Laugh at Temu All You Want—It's Here to Stay
David Sehyeon Baek
Investment, Cybersecurity, DarkWeb/DeepWeb Threat Intelligence, Ethical Hacking, Innovation, Strategy, Business Development, Marketing, IT, International Relations, Diplomacy, M&A, IPO, Accelerating, Policymaking
Temu?
Temu, an online marketplace offering heavily discounted consumer goods primarily shipped directly from China, was launched in September 2022 by PDD Holdings, the parent company of Pinduoduo. PDD Holdings was founded by Colin Huang, a Chinese entrepreneur and software engineer.
Who is Colin Huang?
Born in 1980 in Hangzhou, China, Colin Huang demonstrated an early aptitude for mathematics and computer science. Huang began his career as an engineer at Google China, where he gained valuable experience in the tech industry. After his tenure at Google, Huang ventured into entrepreneurship, founding several startups in the gaming and e-commerce sectors. In 2015, Huang founded Pinduoduo, an innovative e-commerce platform that combined social networking with online shopping, allowing users to participate in group buying deals. Building on the success of Pinduoduo in China, Huang launched Temu in 2022 to extend PDD Holdings' reach into international markets, particularly targeting consumers in North America and beyond. Under Huang's leadership, both Pinduoduo and Temu have experienced rapid growth, with Temu becoming one of the most downloaded shopping apps in the U.S.
How Temu Became So Competitive—Not by Accident, but by Design
Temu’s rapid ascent in the global e-commerce market reveals a multi-faceted growth strategy that combines aggressive expansion, operational agility, and a deep understanding of customer behavior and supply chain dynamics.
Aggressive Market Penetration and Expansion: Temu expanded to 86 countries within two years, far surpassing Amazon’s geographical footprint. This rapid international expansion showcases its ambition to dominate not just mature markets but also emerging ones, such as Africa and Southeast Asia, leveraging their young and growing populations. By establishing local warehouses and inventory supply chains, Temu reduced reliance on long-distance shipping and improved delivery speed, particularly in critical markets like the US. This localized approach mirrors Amazon’s logistics strategies and ensures competitive delivery times.
Customer-Centric Value Proposition: Initially offering extremely low-priced goods, Temu targeted price-conscious shoppers during a time of high inflation. This strategy capitalized on economic uncertainty and positioned the platform as the go-to for budget-friendly shopping. As Temu matured, it began repositioning itself toward affordability with higher-quality offerings. This strategic pivot aims to attract a broader demographic while maintaining its reputation for value.
Supplier Enablement and Supply Chain Optimization: Temu provided a direct channel for small-to-medium-sized Chinese manufacturers to access global markets, creating a win-win ecosystem. Factories could maintain production capacity, while Temu ensured a steady supply of low-cost goods.Temu used the US de minimis rule to ship small packages duty-free, reducing costs and allowing competitive pricing. The US de minimis rule is a trade regulation that allows goods valued at $800 or less to be imported into the United States duty-free. This rule significantly reduces costs for companies shipping low-value items directly to consumers, as no tariffs or duties are applied. E-commerce platforms like Temu and Shein have exploited this rule to ship affordable products from overseas, particularly China, directly to US customers without incurring additional import costs. However, the rule has faced criticism for providing an unfair advantage to foreign companies and contributing to issues like intellectual property violations and labor concerns. The US government is considering reforms to tighten or eliminate the de minimis threshold.
Leveraging Technology and Operational Agility: Temu transitioned from air cargo to ocean freight and local warehousing within months, a feat that would take years for most Western competitors. This agility demonstrates its operational efficiency and ability to pivot quickly in response to market conditions. Its asset-light model, initially dependent on direct shipping from China, enabled rapid market entry without significant infrastructure investment. As the business scales, Temu is strategically layering more infrastructure to sustain growth.
Marketing Mastery: From Super Bowl ads to viral marketing, Temu created widespread awareness and brand recall. This aggressive marketing ensured rapid customer acquisition. By becoming a pop-culture reference (“Temu-thée Chalamet”), the brand has cemented itself as a recognizable name among diverse demographics.
Challenges and Risk Mitigation: Facing regulatory pressures in the US and Europe (e.g., potential de minimis reforms, data privacy concerns), Temu has proactively diversified its logistics and expanded into less politically sensitive markets. Temu’s business practices, including alleged labor issues and environmental impact, could harm its reputation. Addressing these concerns through transparency and improved practices may be crucial for long-term growth. As it transitions from "cheap" to "affordable," Temu risks losing its core differentiator. Developing a strong, positive brand identity beyond low prices will be critical.
Competitive Dynamics: Temu’s localized logistics and inventory mimic Amazon’s strengths, while its broad geographic presence and affordable pricing differentiate it. Amazon’s introduction of “Amazon Haul” highlights Temu’s disruptive impact. Temu’s inclusion of higher-margin items like furniture signals a shift toward a more balanced product portfolio, allowing it to compete with traditional retailers on a wider range of goods.
Strategic Resilience: Temu’s pivot to prioritize regions like Africa and Southeast Asia ensures sustained growth even if regulatory or geopolitical tensions escalate in Western markets.By continuously evolving its supply chain, logistics, and pricing strategies, Temu has shown resilience and foresight in navigating challenges.
Recommended by LinkedIn
A Textbook Case of the Innovator’s Dilemma, as Described by the Late Clayton Christensen
Temu's trajectory aligns well with the concept of the Innovator's Dilemma, as described by Clayton Christensen.
Harvard Business School Professor Clayton Christensen published his book The Innovator’s Dilemma in 1997. In this book, he eloquently described how an innovative company can overtake incumbents—a concept that is evident in the case of Temu vs. Amazon. Christensen, who passed away in 2020, left behind a legacy that continues to influence our understanding of disruptive innovation.
Let us revisit the process: disruption from below, stealing market share from incumbents, sustained innovation to move upmarket, exploiting structural weaknesses, the dilemma for incumbents, and the challenges of moving upmarket.
Disruption from Below: The way they approached the market is very typical of disruption from below. Temu began by targeting underserved or overlooked market segments with its ultra-affordable offerings, much like disruptors in the Innovator's Dilemma. Its focus on price-sensitive consumers during economic inflation created an immediate foothold in the market. Initially, Temu’s products were seen as “cheap” and perhaps less desirable by mainstream customers, similar to how disruptors start with lower-quality or lower-cost alternatives. Over time, the company improved its offerings to appeal to broader and higher-value markets.
Stealing Market Share from Incumbents: Temu’s rapid adoption and operational agility forced Amazon to respond with “Amazon Haul,” a clear indication that Temu is attacking the core of Amazon's business. This is reminiscent of how disruptors force incumbents to adapt to a new competitive landscape. By replacing platforms like Wish in the bargain-shopping niche and gaining recognition beyond it, Temu moved from being a low-end disruptor to a genuine competitor in e-commerce. Amazon Haul is a feature or initiative introduced by Amazon in response to the rising popularity of platforms like Temu. It is designed to replicate Temu's success by offering a similar shopping experience, focusing on bargain deals, a vast selection of affordable items, and streamlined logistics. Amazon Haul mimics key elements of Temu's user interface and supply chain strategies, such as leveraging local inventory and efficient delivery systems, to attract price-conscious consumers and compete directly with platforms known for their budget-friendly offerings.
Sustained Innovation to Move Upmarket: As it transitions from ultra-low-cost to “affordable” with higher-quality offerings, Temu is climbing the value ladder, much like disruptors that start low and gradually move upmarket. This aligns with the Innovator’s Dilemma, where disruptors begin by serving less-demanding customers but eventually attract mainstream customers as they improve. The inclusion of larger, more expensive items like furniture shows that Temu is diversifying its product range to capture a broader market, further challenging incumbents.
Exploiting Structural Weaknesses: Temu exploited regulatory gaps (e.g., the US de minimis rule) to gain a significant cost advantage over incumbents. This mirrors how disruptors often leverage new technologies or processes that incumbents are slow to adopt. With operations in 86 countries compared to Amazon’s 22, Temu has outmaneuvered incumbents by exploiting its asset-light model to expand aggressively, particularly in emerging markets.
The Dilemma for Incumbents: Amazon’s reaction with “Amazon Haul” indicates the classic innovator’s dilemma: should the incumbent fully embrace the new disruptive model (at the risk of cannibalizing its existing business) or defend its core strategy? Western incumbents, constrained by legacy systems and regulatory challenges, cannot match Temu’s pace of operational changes. Temu’s ability to pivot, for instance, to local warehousing within months, highlights the agility gap between disruptors and incumbents. In this situation, should Amazon compete against Temu directly? According to The Innovator's Dilemma by Clayton Christensen, Amazon, as an incumbent, should not directly compete with Temu in its core disruptive market—at least not initially. Incumbents like Amazon are optimized for serving high-end, established customers and generating higher margins. Competing in Temu's low-margin, price-sensitive market may require Amazon to fundamentally change its business model, potentially cannibalizing its core operations. Direct competition could force Amazon to invest heavily in a market segment where it is not structured to compete efficiently, potentially leading to financial losses and internal inefficiencies. Instead of competing directly, Amazon should focus on retaining its core customer base by delivering better value in areas Temu cannot easily replicate, such as superior quality assurance, faster delivery, and a broader range of premium products. If Amazon chooses to compete, Christensen suggests it should create a separate business unit or platform (such as Amazon Haul) specifically tailored to address Temu's market. This approach allows Amazon to experiment and adapt without risking its core operations. Amazon should closely monitor Temu’s growth and strategies while innovating in adjacent or complementary areas. If Temu begins moving upmarket and encroaching on Amazon's core business, a more direct competitive response may be justified.
Challenges of Moving Upmarket: As Temu transitions to “affordable” rather than “cheap,” it risks losing its initial customer base while struggling to establish itself in a more competitive mid-market segment. This is a classic dilemma where disruptors may falter as they move beyond their original niche.Moving upmarket often brings higher scrutiny and operational complexity. Temu is already facing environmental, labor, and regulatory challenges that could constrain its ability to continue disrupting.
Temu’s success hinges on whether it can avoid the pitfalls of both disruptors and incumbents. To succeed, Temu must continue to innovate in areas such as logistics, product mix, and customer experience. A well-defined brand identity can help Temu bridge the gap between its initial low-cost image and its future aspirations. Proactively addressing potential regulatory changes (e.g., de minimis reform) will be crucial to maintaining competitiveness.
From Initial Mockery to Serious Rivalry
There was a lot of ridicule directed at Temu in the beginning. Many influencers thought it was absurd to offer such low prices and mocked the poor quality of its products. While some users ordered similar items of better quality within the same category, the cheap price often reflected cheap quality, making Temu a laughingstock in many circles. However, customers who genuinely needed affordable products—and couldn’t afford higher-quality, expensive options—began to appreciate Temu.
Moreover, Temu tapped into the vast markets of less wealthy countries, which collectively represent a much larger share of the global population than advanced economies. Despite the early mockery, Temu has risen rapidly in the e-commerce market and is now competing directly with Amazon. Remarkably, Temu has achieved this growth in a fraction of the time it took Amazon, leveraging an already established business and revenue model as a fast follower.
As Temu continues to generate more profits and improve its cash flow, it seems only a matter of time before it challenges Amazon’s dominance on an even larger scale—faster than many might imagine.