Majority of Employees are “Quiet quitting” or “Loud quitting”
❌ it's alarming for employers and global economy: the majority (77%) of the world’s employees are not engaged and not thriving and around 18% are actively disengaged (“Loud quitting”). These "loud quitters" take actions that directly harm their organization, undercutting its goals and opposing its leaders. The percentage of employees thriving at work reached a record high in 2022, according to the new annual interesting research published by Gallup - considered a benchmark for measuring employee engagement - called " State of the Global Workplace: 2023 Report " using data from 122,416 global employed respondents face to face or by telephone, covering more than 160 countries
As we discussed in my post last year, the global workplace experienced an engagement rebound but workers are still stressed out.
Gallup researchers estimates that low engagement costs the global economy US$8.8 trillion and accounts for 9% of global GDP.
✅Record number of people thriving at work in 2022
Gallup researchers found that 23% of the world’s employees were engaged at work in 2022, the highest level since they began measuring global engagement in 2009.
✅Majority of the world's employees are "Quiet Quitting" or Loud Quitting"
Researchers found that increasing engagement (23% engaged workers) is good news for employees, who are thriving at work and finding their daily work more rewarding.
But there is also a long way to go, most workers (77%) are “quiet quitting” - not engaged or “loud quitting” - actively disengaged.
Researchers considered that quiet quitters are often your greatest opportunity for growth and change. They are waiting for a leader or a manager to have a conversation with them, encourage them, inspire them. A few changes to how they are managed could turn them into productive team members
✅Disengaged employees are looking actively for a new job
When people see more job opportunities around them, they are more likely to see another job as a possibility. More competition for jobs leads to more enticing job offers and active recruitment as well.
Recommended by LinkedIn
✅Link between Stress and engagement
Researchers found that engagement has 3.8 times as much influence on employee stress as work location. In other words, what people experience in their every day work - their feelings of involvement and enthusiasm - matters more in reducing stress than where they are sitting.
Researchers found that 85% of quieting quitters know what they would change about their workplace and expectations are related to engagement or culture, pay and benefits, or wellbeing-work/life balance.
Finally researchers recommend leaders and managers not to ignore the "Loud Quitters" as loud quitting can signal major risks within an organization.
By not engaging these employees, leaders are missing a primary driver of customer retention and organic business growth. Researchers believed that if leaders are only measuring employee contentment, they are missing engagement and the reality is that many corporate measures of engagement are really just measuring contentment.
True engagement means your people are psychologically present to do their work. They understand what to do; they have what they need; and they have a supportive manager and a supportive team.
The manager is the linchpin of engagement. 70% of team engagement is attributable to the manager. But many or most of your managers are quiet quitting too...
☝️ Leadership and management directly influence workplace engagement, and there is much that organizations can do to help their employees thrive at work.
Thank you 🙏 Gallup Gallup Workplace researchers team for these insightful findings: Jim Harter Jon Clifton
Technologies and design student | Denmark
1yI have a few objections to your post. 1. People are more prone to say that they enjoy their work, when they don't, than they are to say they dislike it when they like it. Meaning this statistic is heavily weighted against people who dislike work. 2. Quiet quitting is just doing the work you need to do, and nothing more, or less. If people do less than what is in their contracts, that's not quiet quitting, it's not doing their job. However if they do quiet quit it should have no impact on your company seeing as they do the exact work, that was said to be expected. Quiet quitting therefore is only an issue if you want people to do more than what's in their contract, which is a manipulation method used to pay workers less. So in conclusion you are upset that your workers do their work, but they don't do more than that. If that is an issue, then put the extra tasks in your new contracts, it will do wonders for you. Of course that would bring less applicants, which I guess is why you didn't include the extra tasks to begin with. If you want more engagement then pay more for more effort, that way you could provide a larger self interest for the employees. Most companies are however unwilling to do that.
Employer Branding Strategist | Driving Talent Engagement & Retention Through Strategic Internal Communication | Leading Industry Insights Through 'Employer Branding Hot Topics' | LinkedIn Growth Expert"
1yMany people, at some point in their career, have worked for a manager that moved them toward quiet quitting. This comes from feeling undervalued and unappreciated. It’s possible that the managers were biased, or they engaged in behavior that was inappropriate. Employees’ lack of motivation was a reaction to the actions of the manager.
Vice President Human Resources
1yThese are interesting insights indeed Nicolas. What stands out for me is that 85% of these quite quitters have clarity on what needs to be done. And with 41% of these 85% resort their quite quitting to Culture and Engagement. It is not a surprise that the impact of culture on employees' decision to leave is higher than pay and benefits. The workforce has shifted dramatically in the recent years to needing more empowerment, recognition and true agility rather than stagnant standardized roles that become redundant during their tenure in the organization.
SanS Recruitment: Director: Engage SA: HR Lead: innovo-HR: Principal Consultant
1yGreat post Nicolas. This is unfortunately a big problem across the entire employment spectrum, and there is unfortunately no one size fit all solution. There are a few basics employers must get right to create and foster a positive work environment and build on that. Focus on interventions that support the overall objective and that adds value.
Until Boards hold CEO’s accountable for improvement in this area, not much will change. This is just so obvious